Abstract

Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number11
JournalEcology and Society
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

comanagement
watershed
momentum
stakeholder
decision making
project

Keywords

  • Adaptive comanagement
  • Agua Fria watershed
  • Arizona
  • Governance network
  • Qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Navigating a murky adaptive comanagement governance network : Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA. / Childs, Cameron; York, Abigail; White, Dave; Schoon, Michael; Bodner, Gitanjali S.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 18, No. 4, 11, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{107ab7283c0044c5a8f5c76c03449fcb,
title = "Navigating a murky adaptive comanagement governance network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA",
abstract = "Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.",
keywords = "Adaptive comanagement, Agua Fria watershed, Arizona, Governance network, Qualitative research",
author = "Cameron Childs and Abigail York and Dave White and Michael Schoon and Bodner, {Gitanjali S.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.5751/ES-05636-180411",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating a murky adaptive comanagement governance network

T2 - Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA

AU - Childs, Cameron

AU - York, Abigail

AU - White, Dave

AU - Schoon, Michael

AU - Bodner, Gitanjali S.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.

AB - Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.

KW - Adaptive comanagement

KW - Agua Fria watershed

KW - Arizona

KW - Governance network

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884926511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884926511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-05636-180411

DO - 10.5751/ES-05636-180411

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 4

M1 - 11

ER -