National design and state building in Sub-Saharan Africa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cameron G. Thies discusses how stylized models of the state-building process derived from the European experience seem to offer minimal guidance to rulers in the contemporary world. Since Europe was the birthplace of the sovereign territorial state, it is often suggested that some aspect of the European experience has not been replicated among the states that emerged in the aftermath of colonialism. Some have argued that developing states are undergoing an experience very similar to that of early modern European states, which resulted in the development of predatory theory. The complex chains of lord-vassal relationships produced overlapping claims to the same territory in which different juridical instances were geographically interwoven and stratified, and plural allegiances, asymmetrical suzerainties, and anomalous enclaves abounded. The effects of the strategies adopted by African rulers to adapt to their political geographic circumstances are initially examined in a single cross-sectional analysis of the post-independence period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)623-669
Number of pages47
JournalWorld Politics
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

experience
theory formation
colonial age

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

National design and state building in Sub-Saharan Africa. / Thies, Cameron.

In: World Politics, Vol. 61, No. 4, 10.2009, p. 623-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a7927a7d79c40999e5e3278730761c0,
title = "National design and state building in Sub-Saharan Africa",
abstract = "Cameron G. Thies discusses how stylized models of the state-building process derived from the European experience seem to offer minimal guidance to rulers in the contemporary world. Since Europe was the birthplace of the sovereign territorial state, it is often suggested that some aspect of the European experience has not been replicated among the states that emerged in the aftermath of colonialism. Some have argued that developing states are undergoing an experience very similar to that of early modern European states, which resulted in the development of predatory theory. The complex chains of lord-vassal relationships produced overlapping claims to the same territory in which different juridical instances were geographically interwoven and stratified, and plural allegiances, asymmetrical suzerainties, and anomalous enclaves abounded. The effects of the strategies adopted by African rulers to adapt to their political geographic circumstances are initially examined in a single cross-sectional analysis of the post-independence period.",
author = "Cameron Thies",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1017/S0043887109990086",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "623--669",
journal = "World Politics",
issn = "0043-8871",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National design and state building in Sub-Saharan Africa

AU - Thies, Cameron

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Cameron G. Thies discusses how stylized models of the state-building process derived from the European experience seem to offer minimal guidance to rulers in the contemporary world. Since Europe was the birthplace of the sovereign territorial state, it is often suggested that some aspect of the European experience has not been replicated among the states that emerged in the aftermath of colonialism. Some have argued that developing states are undergoing an experience very similar to that of early modern European states, which resulted in the development of predatory theory. The complex chains of lord-vassal relationships produced overlapping claims to the same territory in which different juridical instances were geographically interwoven and stratified, and plural allegiances, asymmetrical suzerainties, and anomalous enclaves abounded. The effects of the strategies adopted by African rulers to adapt to their political geographic circumstances are initially examined in a single cross-sectional analysis of the post-independence period.

AB - Cameron G. Thies discusses how stylized models of the state-building process derived from the European experience seem to offer minimal guidance to rulers in the contemporary world. Since Europe was the birthplace of the sovereign territorial state, it is often suggested that some aspect of the European experience has not been replicated among the states that emerged in the aftermath of colonialism. Some have argued that developing states are undergoing an experience very similar to that of early modern European states, which resulted in the development of predatory theory. The complex chains of lord-vassal relationships produced overlapping claims to the same territory in which different juridical instances were geographically interwoven and stratified, and plural allegiances, asymmetrical suzerainties, and anomalous enclaves abounded. The effects of the strategies adopted by African rulers to adapt to their political geographic circumstances are initially examined in a single cross-sectional analysis of the post-independence period.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74349128544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74349128544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0043887109990086

DO - 10.1017/S0043887109990086

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:74349128544

VL - 61

SP - 623

EP - 669

JO - World Politics

JF - World Politics

SN - 0043-8871

IS - 4

ER -