Narratives of participatory governance: Social science and democracy in Mark Bevir’s a theory of governance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Mark Bevir’s A Theory of Governance proposes a Copernican revolution in the way we understand the role of social science in public administration. Conventional accounts assign social science the role of instructing public administrators how to steer its machinery towards the public interest, based on social science’s alleged ability to explain how people act and what they need. Bevir offers a vision of public administration in which ordinary people take a leading role by engaging in dialogues in which they articulate their needs. In this vision, the role of social science is to facilitate those public dialogues. This essay offers a sympathetic critical evaluation of Bevir’s exploration of what it means to understand social science as a facilitator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-388
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
Volume19
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Democracy
social democracy
Social Sciences
social science
governance
narrative
public administration
dialogue
Aptitude
public interest
Administrative Personnel
Social democracy
Social sciences
Governance
ability
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Administration
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{d9b6126dde1c4d599789b7b7365e015c,
title = "Narratives of participatory governance: Social science and democracy in Mark Bevir’s a theory of governance",
abstract = "Mark Bevir’s A Theory of Governance proposes a Copernican revolution in the way we understand the role of social science in public administration. Conventional accounts assign social science the role of instructing public administrators how to steer its machinery towards the public interest, based on social science’s alleged ability to explain how people act and what they need. Bevir offers a vision of public administration in which ordinary people take a leading role by engaging in dialogues in which they articulate their needs. In this vision, the role of social science is to facilitate those public dialogues. This essay offers a sympathetic critical evaluation of Bevir’s exploration of what it means to understand social science as a facilitator.",
author = "Amit Ron",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "372--388",
journal = "International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior",
issn = "1093-4537",
publisher = "Marcel Dekker Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narratives of participatory governance

T2 - Social science and democracy in Mark Bevir’s a theory of governance

AU - Ron, Amit

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Mark Bevir’s A Theory of Governance proposes a Copernican revolution in the way we understand the role of social science in public administration. Conventional accounts assign social science the role of instructing public administrators how to steer its machinery towards the public interest, based on social science’s alleged ability to explain how people act and what they need. Bevir offers a vision of public administration in which ordinary people take a leading role by engaging in dialogues in which they articulate their needs. In this vision, the role of social science is to facilitate those public dialogues. This essay offers a sympathetic critical evaluation of Bevir’s exploration of what it means to understand social science as a facilitator.

AB - Mark Bevir’s A Theory of Governance proposes a Copernican revolution in the way we understand the role of social science in public administration. Conventional accounts assign social science the role of instructing public administrators how to steer its machinery towards the public interest, based on social science’s alleged ability to explain how people act and what they need. Bevir offers a vision of public administration in which ordinary people take a leading role by engaging in dialogues in which they articulate their needs. In this vision, the role of social science is to facilitate those public dialogues. This essay offers a sympathetic critical evaluation of Bevir’s exploration of what it means to understand social science as a facilitator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991628975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991628975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991628975

VL - 19

SP - 372

EP - 388

JO - International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior

JF - International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior

SN - 1093-4537

IS - 3

ER -