Nanotechnology: Mapping the wild regulatory frontier

Diana Bowman, Graeme A. Hodge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the phenomena of nanotechnology and takes some tentative steps towards defining new regulatory frontiers within which this technology may operate. While nanotechnology has attracted much attention with respect to its scientific and business potential, debate on associated ethical, policy, regulatory and legal aspects has been limited. This paper builds on the conceptual frameworks of Ayres and Braithwaite [Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992] and Grabosky [Discussion paper: Inside the pyramid: towards a conceptual framework for the analysis of regulatory systems, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 25 (1997) 195-201], in order to address the regulatory challenges posed by the novel properties and products emerging from nanotechnology. The paper considers the current regulatory frameworks that impact upon nanotechnology in Australia, and concludes that there is an emerging regulatory gap between the exciting commercial advances being made in this sector and the community's expectations for regulatory safeguards and protections. The paper also concludes that, unlike earlier technologies, there is now a unique opportunity to carefully consider the benefits as well as the impacts of nanotechnology before it arrives. This will require clearer articulation of policy, regulatory and legal frontiers crucial to the emerging nano-age.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1060-1073
Number of pages14
JournalFutures
Volume38
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
legal policy
regulatory policy
conceptual framework
sociology of law
regulatory framework
deregulation
international system
Nanotechnology
regulation
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Nanotechnology : Mapping the wild regulatory frontier. / Bowman, Diana; Hodge, Graeme A.

In: Futures, Vol. 38, No. 9, 11.2006, p. 1060-1073.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bowman, Diana ; Hodge, Graeme A. / Nanotechnology : Mapping the wild regulatory frontier. In: Futures. 2006 ; Vol. 38, No. 9. pp. 1060-1073.
@article{d95d25b4c0974a7bb99ccd70256b67c6,
title = "Nanotechnology: Mapping the wild regulatory frontier",
abstract = "This paper examines the phenomena of nanotechnology and takes some tentative steps towards defining new regulatory frontiers within which this technology may operate. While nanotechnology has attracted much attention with respect to its scientific and business potential, debate on associated ethical, policy, regulatory and legal aspects has been limited. This paper builds on the conceptual frameworks of Ayres and Braithwaite [Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992] and Grabosky [Discussion paper: Inside the pyramid: towards a conceptual framework for the analysis of regulatory systems, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 25 (1997) 195-201], in order to address the regulatory challenges posed by the novel properties and products emerging from nanotechnology. The paper considers the current regulatory frameworks that impact upon nanotechnology in Australia, and concludes that there is an emerging regulatory gap between the exciting commercial advances being made in this sector and the community's expectations for regulatory safeguards and protections. The paper also concludes that, unlike earlier technologies, there is now a unique opportunity to carefully consider the benefits as well as the impacts of nanotechnology before it arrives. This will require clearer articulation of policy, regulatory and legal frontiers crucial to the emerging nano-age.",
author = "Diana Bowman and Hodge, {Graeme A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1060--1073",
journal = "Futures",
issn = "0016-3287",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nanotechnology

T2 - Mapping the wild regulatory frontier

AU - Bowman, Diana

AU - Hodge, Graeme A.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - This paper examines the phenomena of nanotechnology and takes some tentative steps towards defining new regulatory frontiers within which this technology may operate. While nanotechnology has attracted much attention with respect to its scientific and business potential, debate on associated ethical, policy, regulatory and legal aspects has been limited. This paper builds on the conceptual frameworks of Ayres and Braithwaite [Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992] and Grabosky [Discussion paper: Inside the pyramid: towards a conceptual framework for the analysis of regulatory systems, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 25 (1997) 195-201], in order to address the regulatory challenges posed by the novel properties and products emerging from nanotechnology. The paper considers the current regulatory frameworks that impact upon nanotechnology in Australia, and concludes that there is an emerging regulatory gap between the exciting commercial advances being made in this sector and the community's expectations for regulatory safeguards and protections. The paper also concludes that, unlike earlier technologies, there is now a unique opportunity to carefully consider the benefits as well as the impacts of nanotechnology before it arrives. This will require clearer articulation of policy, regulatory and legal frontiers crucial to the emerging nano-age.

AB - This paper examines the phenomena of nanotechnology and takes some tentative steps towards defining new regulatory frontiers within which this technology may operate. While nanotechnology has attracted much attention with respect to its scientific and business potential, debate on associated ethical, policy, regulatory and legal aspects has been limited. This paper builds on the conceptual frameworks of Ayres and Braithwaite [Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992] and Grabosky [Discussion paper: Inside the pyramid: towards a conceptual framework for the analysis of regulatory systems, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 25 (1997) 195-201], in order to address the regulatory challenges posed by the novel properties and products emerging from nanotechnology. The paper considers the current regulatory frameworks that impact upon nanotechnology in Australia, and concludes that there is an emerging regulatory gap between the exciting commercial advances being made in this sector and the community's expectations for regulatory safeguards and protections. The paper also concludes that, unlike earlier technologies, there is now a unique opportunity to carefully consider the benefits as well as the impacts of nanotechnology before it arrives. This will require clearer articulation of policy, regulatory and legal frontiers crucial to the emerging nano-age.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747766449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747766449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.017

DO - 10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33747766449

VL - 38

SP - 1060

EP - 1073

JO - Futures

JF - Futures

SN - 0016-3287

IS - 9

ER -