Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity

Scale variance and pattern metrics

Jianguo Wu, Matt Luck, Dennis E. Jelinski, Paul T. Tueller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

245 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A major goal of landscape ecology is to understand the formation, dynamics, and maintenance of spatial heterogeneity. Spatial heterogeneity is the most fundamental characteristic of all landscapes, and scale multiplicity is inherent in spatial heterogeneity. Thus, multiscale analysis is imperative for understanding the structure, function and dynamics of landscapes. Although a number of methods have been used for multiscale analysis in landscape ecology since the 1980s, the effectiveness of many of them, including some commonly used ones, is not clear or questionable. In this paper, we discuss two approaches to multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: the direct and indirect approaches. We will focus on scale variance and semivariance methods in the first approach and 17 landscape metrics in the second. The results show that scale variance is potentially a powerful method to detect and describe multiple-scale structures of landscapes, while semivariance analysis may often fail to do so especially if landscape variability is dominant at broad scales over fine scales. Landscape metrics respond to changing grain size rather differently, and these changes are reflective of the modifiable areal unit problem as well as multiple-scale structures in landscape pattern. Interestingly, some metrics (e.g., the number of patches, patch density, total edge, edge density, mean patch size, patch size coefficient of variation) exhibit consistent, predictable patterns over a wide range of grain sizes, whereas others (e.g., patch diversity, contagion, landscape fractal dimension) have nonlinear response curves. The two approaches to multiple-scale analysis are complementary, and their pros and cons still need to be further investigated systematically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-19
Number of pages14
JournalGeographic Information Sciences
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2000

Fingerprint

Ecology
Fractal dimension
landscape ecology
patch size
grain size
analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity : Scale variance and pattern metrics. / Wu, Jianguo; Luck, Matt; Jelinski, Dennis E.; Tueller, Paul T.

In: Geographic Information Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.06.2000, p. 6-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, Jianguo ; Luck, Matt ; Jelinski, Dennis E. ; Tueller, Paul T. / Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity : Scale variance and pattern metrics. In: Geographic Information Sciences. 2000 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 6-19.
@article{25758306b8df49c285bfb6d08f94b747,
title = "Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: Scale variance and pattern metrics",
abstract = "A major goal of landscape ecology is to understand the formation, dynamics, and maintenance of spatial heterogeneity. Spatial heterogeneity is the most fundamental characteristic of all landscapes, and scale multiplicity is inherent in spatial heterogeneity. Thus, multiscale analysis is imperative for understanding the structure, function and dynamics of landscapes. Although a number of methods have been used for multiscale analysis in landscape ecology since the 1980s, the effectiveness of many of them, including some commonly used ones, is not clear or questionable. In this paper, we discuss two approaches to multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: the direct and indirect approaches. We will focus on scale variance and semivariance methods in the first approach and 17 landscape metrics in the second. The results show that scale variance is potentially a powerful method to detect and describe multiple-scale structures of landscapes, while semivariance analysis may often fail to do so especially if landscape variability is dominant at broad scales over fine scales. Landscape metrics respond to changing grain size rather differently, and these changes are reflective of the modifiable areal unit problem as well as multiple-scale structures in landscape pattern. Interestingly, some metrics (e.g., the number of patches, patch density, total edge, edge density, mean patch size, patch size coefficient of variation) exhibit consistent, predictable patterns over a wide range of grain sizes, whereas others (e.g., patch diversity, contagion, landscape fractal dimension) have nonlinear response curves. The two approaches to multiple-scale analysis are complementary, and their pros and cons still need to be further investigated systematically.",
author = "Jianguo Wu and Matt Luck and Jelinski, {Dennis E.} and Tueller, {Paul T.}",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10824000009480529",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "6--19",
journal = "Annals of GIS",
issn = "1947-5683",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity

T2 - Scale variance and pattern metrics

AU - Wu, Jianguo

AU - Luck, Matt

AU - Jelinski, Dennis E.

AU - Tueller, Paul T.

PY - 2000/6/1

Y1 - 2000/6/1

N2 - A major goal of landscape ecology is to understand the formation, dynamics, and maintenance of spatial heterogeneity. Spatial heterogeneity is the most fundamental characteristic of all landscapes, and scale multiplicity is inherent in spatial heterogeneity. Thus, multiscale analysis is imperative for understanding the structure, function and dynamics of landscapes. Although a number of methods have been used for multiscale analysis in landscape ecology since the 1980s, the effectiveness of many of them, including some commonly used ones, is not clear or questionable. In this paper, we discuss two approaches to multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: the direct and indirect approaches. We will focus on scale variance and semivariance methods in the first approach and 17 landscape metrics in the second. The results show that scale variance is potentially a powerful method to detect and describe multiple-scale structures of landscapes, while semivariance analysis may often fail to do so especially if landscape variability is dominant at broad scales over fine scales. Landscape metrics respond to changing grain size rather differently, and these changes are reflective of the modifiable areal unit problem as well as multiple-scale structures in landscape pattern. Interestingly, some metrics (e.g., the number of patches, patch density, total edge, edge density, mean patch size, patch size coefficient of variation) exhibit consistent, predictable patterns over a wide range of grain sizes, whereas others (e.g., patch diversity, contagion, landscape fractal dimension) have nonlinear response curves. The two approaches to multiple-scale analysis are complementary, and their pros and cons still need to be further investigated systematically.

AB - A major goal of landscape ecology is to understand the formation, dynamics, and maintenance of spatial heterogeneity. Spatial heterogeneity is the most fundamental characteristic of all landscapes, and scale multiplicity is inherent in spatial heterogeneity. Thus, multiscale analysis is imperative for understanding the structure, function and dynamics of landscapes. Although a number of methods have been used for multiscale analysis in landscape ecology since the 1980s, the effectiveness of many of them, including some commonly used ones, is not clear or questionable. In this paper, we discuss two approaches to multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: the direct and indirect approaches. We will focus on scale variance and semivariance methods in the first approach and 17 landscape metrics in the second. The results show that scale variance is potentially a powerful method to detect and describe multiple-scale structures of landscapes, while semivariance analysis may often fail to do so especially if landscape variability is dominant at broad scales over fine scales. Landscape metrics respond to changing grain size rather differently, and these changes are reflective of the modifiable areal unit problem as well as multiple-scale structures in landscape pattern. Interestingly, some metrics (e.g., the number of patches, patch density, total edge, edge density, mean patch size, patch size coefficient of variation) exhibit consistent, predictable patterns over a wide range of grain sizes, whereas others (e.g., patch diversity, contagion, landscape fractal dimension) have nonlinear response curves. The two approaches to multiple-scale analysis are complementary, and their pros and cons still need to be further investigated systematically.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024037671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024037671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10824000009480529

DO - 10.1080/10824000009480529

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 6

EP - 19

JO - Annals of GIS

JF - Annals of GIS

SN - 1947-5683

IS - 1

ER -