TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple models guide strategies for agricultural nutrient reductions
AU - Scavia, Donald
AU - Kalcic, Margaret
AU - Muenich, Rebecca Logsdon
AU - Read, Jennifer
AU - Aloysius, Noel
AU - Bertani, Isabella
AU - Boles, Chelsie
AU - Confesor, Remegio
AU - DePinto, Joseph
AU - Gildow, Marie
AU - Martin, Jay
AU - Redder, Todd
AU - Robertson, Dale
AU - Sowa, Scott
AU - Wang, Yu Chen
AU - Yen, Haw
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Erb Family Foundation grant 856, US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant 1313897, Joyce Foundation grant 15-36415, and NOAA grant NA13OAR4310142 to the University of Michigan; a Great Lakes Protection Fund grant and an International Plant Nutrition Institute grant 58-3604-4-005 to LimnoTech; an NSF grant GRT00022685 and an Ohio Sea Grant to Ohio State University; USDA agreement 59-3604-4-001 through USDA agreement 58-3604-4-005 to Heidelberg University; and USDA support for the ARS model. We thank J Arnold and M White for their thoughtful insights and advice throughout the project; representatives of the environmental and agricultural communities for helping shape the questions we asked of the models; and E Cisar, D Saad, T Stuntebeck, and T Bruulsema for their comments on this work. USGS was not involved in the development of the models used in this study. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Ecological Society of America
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - In response to degraded water quality, federal policy makers in the US and Canada called for a 40% reduction in phosphorus (P) loads to Lake Erie, and state and provincial policy makers in the Great Lakes region set a load-reduction target for the year 2025. Here, we configured five separate SWAT (US Department of Agriculture's Soil and Water Assessment Tool) models to assess load reduction strategies for the agriculturally dominated Maumee River watershed, the largest P source contributing to toxic algal blooms in Lake Erie. Although several potential pathways may achieve the target loads, our results show that any successful pathway will require large-scale implementation of multiple practices. For example, one successful pathway involved targeting 50% of row cropland that has the highest P loss in the watershed with a combination of three practices: subsurface application of P fertilizers, planting cereal rye as a winter cover crop, and installing buffer strips. Achieving these levels of implementation will require local, state/provincial, and federal agencies to collaborate with the private sector to set shared implementation goals and to demand innovation and honest assessments of water quality-related programs, policies, and partnerships.
AB - In response to degraded water quality, federal policy makers in the US and Canada called for a 40% reduction in phosphorus (P) loads to Lake Erie, and state and provincial policy makers in the Great Lakes region set a load-reduction target for the year 2025. Here, we configured five separate SWAT (US Department of Agriculture's Soil and Water Assessment Tool) models to assess load reduction strategies for the agriculturally dominated Maumee River watershed, the largest P source contributing to toxic algal blooms in Lake Erie. Although several potential pathways may achieve the target loads, our results show that any successful pathway will require large-scale implementation of multiple practices. For example, one successful pathway involved targeting 50% of row cropland that has the highest P loss in the watershed with a combination of three practices: subsurface application of P fertilizers, planting cereal rye as a winter cover crop, and installing buffer strips. Achieving these levels of implementation will require local, state/provincial, and federal agencies to collaborate with the private sector to set shared implementation goals and to demand innovation and honest assessments of water quality-related programs, policies, and partnerships.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017141477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017141477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/fee.1472
DO - 10.1002/fee.1472
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85017141477
SN - 1540-9295
VL - 15
SP - 126
EP - 132
JO - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
JF - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
IS - 3
ER -