Multicriteria decision analysis: A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments

I. Linkov, F. K. Satterstrom, G. Kiker, Thomas Seager, T. Bridges, K. H. Gardner, S. H. Rogers, D. A. Belluck, A. Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contaminated sediments and other sites present a difficult challenge for environmental decisionmakers. They are typically slow to recover or attenuate naturally, may involve multiple regulatory agencies and stakeholder groups, and engender multiple toxicological and ecotoxicological risks. While environmental decision-making strategies over the last several decades have evolved into increasingly more sophisticated, information-intensive, and complex approaches, there remains considerable dissatisfaction among business, industry, and the public with existing management strategies. Consequently, contaminated sediments and materials are the subject of intense technology development, such as beneficial reuse or in situ treatment. However, current decision analysis approaches, such as comparative risk assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, do not offer a comprehensive approach for incorporating the varied types of information and multiple stakeholder and public views that must typically be brought to bear when new technologies are under consideration. Alternatively, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers a scientifically sound decision framework for management of contaminated materials or sites where stakeholder participation is of crucial concern and criteria such as economics, environmental impacts, safety, and risk cannot be easily condensed into simple monetary expressions. This article brings together a multidisciplinary review of existing decision-making approaches at regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe and synthesizes state-of-the-art research in MCDA methods applicable to the assessment of contaminated sediment management technologies. Additionally, it tests an MCDA approach for coupling expert judgment and stakeholder values in a hypothetical contaminated sediments management case study wherein MCDA is used as a tool for testing stakeholder responses to and improving expert assessment of innovative contaminated sediments technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-78
Number of pages18
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Decision theory
Sediments
stakeholder
management
Technology
Decision Making
Organizational Case Studies
Decision making
Cost benefit analysis
expert
decision making
life cycle assessment
Life Cycle Stages
Risk assessment
Toxicology
cost-benefit analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Environmental impact
Life cycle

Keywords

  • MCDA
  • Multicriteria decision analysis
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

Multicriteria decision analysis : A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments. / Linkov, I.; Satterstrom, F. K.; Kiker, G.; Seager, Thomas; Bridges, T.; Gardner, K. H.; Rogers, S. H.; Belluck, D. A.; Meyer, A.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 61-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Linkov, I, Satterstrom, FK, Kiker, G, Seager, T, Bridges, T, Gardner, KH, Rogers, SH, Belluck, DA & Meyer, A 2006, 'Multicriteria decision analysis: A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments', Risk Analysis, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00713.x
Linkov, I. ; Satterstrom, F. K. ; Kiker, G. ; Seager, Thomas ; Bridges, T. ; Gardner, K. H. ; Rogers, S. H. ; Belluck, D. A. ; Meyer, A. / Multicriteria decision analysis : A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments. In: Risk Analysis. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 61-78.
@article{219ac5735dc84a3298d85d056b3013fe,
title = "Multicriteria decision analysis: A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments",
abstract = "Contaminated sediments and other sites present a difficult challenge for environmental decisionmakers. They are typically slow to recover or attenuate naturally, may involve multiple regulatory agencies and stakeholder groups, and engender multiple toxicological and ecotoxicological risks. While environmental decision-making strategies over the last several decades have evolved into increasingly more sophisticated, information-intensive, and complex approaches, there remains considerable dissatisfaction among business, industry, and the public with existing management strategies. Consequently, contaminated sediments and materials are the subject of intense technology development, such as beneficial reuse or in situ treatment. However, current decision analysis approaches, such as comparative risk assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, do not offer a comprehensive approach for incorporating the varied types of information and multiple stakeholder and public views that must typically be brought to bear when new technologies are under consideration. Alternatively, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers a scientifically sound decision framework for management of contaminated materials or sites where stakeholder participation is of crucial concern and criteria such as economics, environmental impacts, safety, and risk cannot be easily condensed into simple monetary expressions. This article brings together a multidisciplinary review of existing decision-making approaches at regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe and synthesizes state-of-the-art research in MCDA methods applicable to the assessment of contaminated sediment management technologies. Additionally, it tests an MCDA approach for coupling expert judgment and stakeholder values in a hypothetical contaminated sediments management case study wherein MCDA is used as a tool for testing stakeholder responses to and improving expert assessment of innovative contaminated sediments technologies.",
keywords = "MCDA, Multicriteria decision analysis, Risk assessment",
author = "I. Linkov and Satterstrom, {F. K.} and G. Kiker and Thomas Seager and T. Bridges and Gardner, {K. H.} and Rogers, {S. H.} and Belluck, {D. A.} and A. Meyer",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00713.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "61--78",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicriteria decision analysis

T2 - A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments

AU - Linkov, I.

AU - Satterstrom, F. K.

AU - Kiker, G.

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Bridges, T.

AU - Gardner, K. H.

AU - Rogers, S. H.

AU - Belluck, D. A.

AU - Meyer, A.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Contaminated sediments and other sites present a difficult challenge for environmental decisionmakers. They are typically slow to recover or attenuate naturally, may involve multiple regulatory agencies and stakeholder groups, and engender multiple toxicological and ecotoxicological risks. While environmental decision-making strategies over the last several decades have evolved into increasingly more sophisticated, information-intensive, and complex approaches, there remains considerable dissatisfaction among business, industry, and the public with existing management strategies. Consequently, contaminated sediments and materials are the subject of intense technology development, such as beneficial reuse or in situ treatment. However, current decision analysis approaches, such as comparative risk assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, do not offer a comprehensive approach for incorporating the varied types of information and multiple stakeholder and public views that must typically be brought to bear when new technologies are under consideration. Alternatively, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers a scientifically sound decision framework for management of contaminated materials or sites where stakeholder participation is of crucial concern and criteria such as economics, environmental impacts, safety, and risk cannot be easily condensed into simple monetary expressions. This article brings together a multidisciplinary review of existing decision-making approaches at regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe and synthesizes state-of-the-art research in MCDA methods applicable to the assessment of contaminated sediment management technologies. Additionally, it tests an MCDA approach for coupling expert judgment and stakeholder values in a hypothetical contaminated sediments management case study wherein MCDA is used as a tool for testing stakeholder responses to and improving expert assessment of innovative contaminated sediments technologies.

AB - Contaminated sediments and other sites present a difficult challenge for environmental decisionmakers. They are typically slow to recover or attenuate naturally, may involve multiple regulatory agencies and stakeholder groups, and engender multiple toxicological and ecotoxicological risks. While environmental decision-making strategies over the last several decades have evolved into increasingly more sophisticated, information-intensive, and complex approaches, there remains considerable dissatisfaction among business, industry, and the public with existing management strategies. Consequently, contaminated sediments and materials are the subject of intense technology development, such as beneficial reuse or in situ treatment. However, current decision analysis approaches, such as comparative risk assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, do not offer a comprehensive approach for incorporating the varied types of information and multiple stakeholder and public views that must typically be brought to bear when new technologies are under consideration. Alternatively, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers a scientifically sound decision framework for management of contaminated materials or sites where stakeholder participation is of crucial concern and criteria such as economics, environmental impacts, safety, and risk cannot be easily condensed into simple monetary expressions. This article brings together a multidisciplinary review of existing decision-making approaches at regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe and synthesizes state-of-the-art research in MCDA methods applicable to the assessment of contaminated sediment management technologies. Additionally, it tests an MCDA approach for coupling expert judgment and stakeholder values in a hypothetical contaminated sediments management case study wherein MCDA is used as a tool for testing stakeholder responses to and improving expert assessment of innovative contaminated sediments technologies.

KW - MCDA

KW - Multicriteria decision analysis

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645103576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645103576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00713.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00713.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16492181

AN - SCOPUS:33645103576

VL - 26

SP - 61

EP - 78

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 1

ER -