Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans: Implications for micro-scale electrocorticography

Spencer Kellis, Larry Sorensen, Felix Darvas, Conor Sayres, Kevin O'Neill, Richard B. Brown, Paul House, Jeff Ojemann, Bradley Greger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Electrocorticography grids have been used to study and diagnose neural pathophysiology for over 50. years, and recently have been used for various neural prosthetic applications. Here we provide evidence that micro-scale electrodes are better suited for studying cortical pathology and function, and for implementing neural prostheses. Methods: This work compares dynamics in space, time, and frequency of cortical field potentials recorded by three types of electrodes: electrocorticographic (ECoG) electrodes, non-penetrating micro-ECoG (μECoG) electrodes that use microelectrodes and have tighter interelectrode spacing; and penetrating microelectrodes (MEA) that penetrate the cortex to record single- or multiunit activity (SUA or MUA) and local field potentials (LFP). Results: While the finest spatial scales are found in LFPs recorded intracortically, we found that LFP recorded from μECoG electrodes demonstrate scales of linear similarity (i.e., correlation, coherence, and phase) closer to the intracortical electrodes than the clinical ECoG electrodes. Conclusions: We conclude that LFPs can be recorded intracortically and epicortically at finer scales than clinical ECoG electrodes are capable of capturing. Significance: Recorded with appropriately scaled electrodes and grids, field potentials expose a more detailed representation of cortical network activity, enabling advanced analyses of cortical pathology and demanding applications such as brain-computer interfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

Human Activities
Electrodes
Microelectrodes
Neural Prostheses
Pathology
Brain-Computer Interfaces
Electrocorticography

Keywords

  • Brain computer interface (BCI)
  • Human cerebral cortex
  • Micro-electrocorticography grid
  • Neural engineering
  • Neural microtechnology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans : Implications for micro-scale electrocorticography. / Kellis, Spencer; Sorensen, Larry; Darvas, Felix; Sayres, Conor; O'Neill, Kevin; Brown, Richard B.; House, Paul; Ojemann, Jeff; Greger, Bradley.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kellis, Spencer ; Sorensen, Larry ; Darvas, Felix ; Sayres, Conor ; O'Neill, Kevin ; Brown, Richard B. ; House, Paul ; Ojemann, Jeff ; Greger, Bradley. / Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans : Implications for micro-scale electrocorticography. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015.
@article{020944a778d443fabdc8323bbfe57245,
title = "Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans: Implications for micro-scale electrocorticography",
abstract = "Objective: Electrocorticography grids have been used to study and diagnose neural pathophysiology for over 50. years, and recently have been used for various neural prosthetic applications. Here we provide evidence that micro-scale electrodes are better suited for studying cortical pathology and function, and for implementing neural prostheses. Methods: This work compares dynamics in space, time, and frequency of cortical field potentials recorded by three types of electrodes: electrocorticographic (ECoG) electrodes, non-penetrating micro-ECoG (μECoG) electrodes that use microelectrodes and have tighter interelectrode spacing; and penetrating microelectrodes (MEA) that penetrate the cortex to record single- or multiunit activity (SUA or MUA) and local field potentials (LFP). Results: While the finest spatial scales are found in LFPs recorded intracortically, we found that LFP recorded from μECoG electrodes demonstrate scales of linear similarity (i.e., correlation, coherence, and phase) closer to the intracortical electrodes than the clinical ECoG electrodes. Conclusions: We conclude that LFPs can be recorded intracortically and epicortically at finer scales than clinical ECoG electrodes are capable of capturing. Significance: Recorded with appropriately scaled electrodes and grids, field potentials expose a more detailed representation of cortical network activity, enabling advanced analyses of cortical pathology and demanding applications such as brain-computer interfaces.",
keywords = "Brain computer interface (BCI), Human cerebral cortex, Micro-electrocorticography grid, Neural engineering, Neural microtechnology",
author = "Spencer Kellis and Larry Sorensen and Felix Darvas and Conor Sayres and Kevin O'Neill and Brown, {Richard B.} and Paul House and Jeff Ojemann and Bradley Greger",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans

T2 - Implications for micro-scale electrocorticography

AU - Kellis, Spencer

AU - Sorensen, Larry

AU - Darvas, Felix

AU - Sayres, Conor

AU - O'Neill, Kevin

AU - Brown, Richard B.

AU - House, Paul

AU - Ojemann, Jeff

AU - Greger, Bradley

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective: Electrocorticography grids have been used to study and diagnose neural pathophysiology for over 50. years, and recently have been used for various neural prosthetic applications. Here we provide evidence that micro-scale electrodes are better suited for studying cortical pathology and function, and for implementing neural prostheses. Methods: This work compares dynamics in space, time, and frequency of cortical field potentials recorded by three types of electrodes: electrocorticographic (ECoG) electrodes, non-penetrating micro-ECoG (μECoG) electrodes that use microelectrodes and have tighter interelectrode spacing; and penetrating microelectrodes (MEA) that penetrate the cortex to record single- or multiunit activity (SUA or MUA) and local field potentials (LFP). Results: While the finest spatial scales are found in LFPs recorded intracortically, we found that LFP recorded from μECoG electrodes demonstrate scales of linear similarity (i.e., correlation, coherence, and phase) closer to the intracortical electrodes than the clinical ECoG electrodes. Conclusions: We conclude that LFPs can be recorded intracortically and epicortically at finer scales than clinical ECoG electrodes are capable of capturing. Significance: Recorded with appropriately scaled electrodes and grids, field potentials expose a more detailed representation of cortical network activity, enabling advanced analyses of cortical pathology and demanding applications such as brain-computer interfaces.

AB - Objective: Electrocorticography grids have been used to study and diagnose neural pathophysiology for over 50. years, and recently have been used for various neural prosthetic applications. Here we provide evidence that micro-scale electrodes are better suited for studying cortical pathology and function, and for implementing neural prostheses. Methods: This work compares dynamics in space, time, and frequency of cortical field potentials recorded by three types of electrodes: electrocorticographic (ECoG) electrodes, non-penetrating micro-ECoG (μECoG) electrodes that use microelectrodes and have tighter interelectrode spacing; and penetrating microelectrodes (MEA) that penetrate the cortex to record single- or multiunit activity (SUA or MUA) and local field potentials (LFP). Results: While the finest spatial scales are found in LFPs recorded intracortically, we found that LFP recorded from μECoG electrodes demonstrate scales of linear similarity (i.e., correlation, coherence, and phase) closer to the intracortical electrodes than the clinical ECoG electrodes. Conclusions: We conclude that LFPs can be recorded intracortically and epicortically at finer scales than clinical ECoG electrodes are capable of capturing. Significance: Recorded with appropriately scaled electrodes and grids, field potentials expose a more detailed representation of cortical network activity, enabling advanced analyses of cortical pathology and demanding applications such as brain-computer interfaces.

KW - Brain computer interface (BCI)

KW - Human cerebral cortex

KW - Micro-electrocorticography grid

KW - Neural engineering

KW - Neural microtechnology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933564424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933564424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 26138146

AN - SCOPUS:84933564424

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

ER -