TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-scale analysis of neural activity in humans
T2 - Implications for micro-scale electrocorticography
AU - Kellis, Spencer
AU - Sorensen, Larry
AU - Darvas, Felix
AU - Sayres, Conor
AU - O'Neill, Kevin
AU - Brown, Richard B.
AU - House, Paul
AU - Ojemann, Jeff
AU - Greger, Bradley
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a Utah Research Foundation grant and DARPA N66001-06-C-8005 funding (BG); and the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under award number EEC-9986866 (RB). The authors thank Kristin Kraus for her editorial assistance, the Univ. of Utah Health Sciences EEG staff for their assistance in conducting the study, and most importantly the patients for participating in the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Objective: Electrocorticography grids have been used to study and diagnose neural pathophysiology for over 50 years, and recently have been used for various neural prosthetic applications. Here we provide evidence that micro-scale electrodes are better suited for studying cortical pathology and function, and for implementing neural prostheses. Methods: This work compares dynamics in space, time, and frequency of cortical field potentials recorded by three types of electrodes: electrocorticographic (ECoG) electrodes, non-penetrating micro-ECoG (μECoG) electrodes that use microelectrodes and have tighter interelectrode spacing; and penetrating microelectrodes (MEA) that penetrate the cortex to record single- or multiunit activity (SUA or MUA) and local field potentials (LFP). Results: While the finest spatial scales are found in LFPs recorded intracortically, we found that LFP recorded from μECoG electrodes demonstrate scales of linear similarity (i.e., correlation, coherence, and phase) closer to the intracortical electrodes than the clinical ECoG electrodes. Conclusions: We conclude that LFPs can be recorded intracortically and epicortically at finer scales than clinical ECoG electrodes are capable of capturing. Significance: Recorded with appropriately scaled electrodes and grids, field potentials expose a more detailed representation of cortical network activity, enabling advanced analyses of cortical pathology and demanding applications such as brain-computer interfaces.
AB - Objective: Electrocorticography grids have been used to study and diagnose neural pathophysiology for over 50 years, and recently have been used for various neural prosthetic applications. Here we provide evidence that micro-scale electrodes are better suited for studying cortical pathology and function, and for implementing neural prostheses. Methods: This work compares dynamics in space, time, and frequency of cortical field potentials recorded by three types of electrodes: electrocorticographic (ECoG) electrodes, non-penetrating micro-ECoG (μECoG) electrodes that use microelectrodes and have tighter interelectrode spacing; and penetrating microelectrodes (MEA) that penetrate the cortex to record single- or multiunit activity (SUA or MUA) and local field potentials (LFP). Results: While the finest spatial scales are found in LFPs recorded intracortically, we found that LFP recorded from μECoG electrodes demonstrate scales of linear similarity (i.e., correlation, coherence, and phase) closer to the intracortical electrodes than the clinical ECoG electrodes. Conclusions: We conclude that LFPs can be recorded intracortically and epicortically at finer scales than clinical ECoG electrodes are capable of capturing. Significance: Recorded with appropriately scaled electrodes and grids, field potentials expose a more detailed representation of cortical network activity, enabling advanced analyses of cortical pathology and demanding applications such as brain-computer interfaces.
KW - Brain computer interface (BCI)
KW - Human cerebral cortex
KW - Micro-electrocorticography grid
KW - Neural engineering
KW - Neural microtechnology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933564424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933564424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 26138146
AN - SCOPUS:84933564424
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 127
SP - 591
EP - 601
JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
IS - 1
ER -