TY - GEN
T1 - Multi-dimensional utility model for selection of a trenchless construction method
AU - Allouche, E. N.
AU - Ariaratnam, S. T.
AU - Abourizk, S. M.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - This paper describes a decision-support system developed to assist practicing professionals in matching project parameters with characteristics of the various construction methods and evaluating the degree to which each method satisfies user requirements. The model, named Innovative Modular Procedure for Evaluation of Construction Technologies (I.M.P.E.C.T), combines concepts from constraint satisfaction techniques, linear algebra, calculus, and applied statistics. The proposed model employs a two-step selection process, namely a technical evaluation and a preference evaluation. At the technical evaluation stage, characteristics of each construction method are compared with the project's qualifying attributes (i.e. pipe diameter) to ensure technical soundness of the method. The preference evaluation process includes parameters considered to be controlled by the user (i.e. cost). The model determines the likelihood that each of the construction methods will satisfy the user objectives and rank it based on its utility value, which is equal to the sum of the product of each degree of user objective satisfaction and the probability of such an outcome. The proposed method represents a powerful decision-making model capable of addressing the complex and interacting technical, social, business, and risk aspects associated with many large trenchless technology projects.
AB - This paper describes a decision-support system developed to assist practicing professionals in matching project parameters with characteristics of the various construction methods and evaluating the degree to which each method satisfies user requirements. The model, named Innovative Modular Procedure for Evaluation of Construction Technologies (I.M.P.E.C.T), combines concepts from constraint satisfaction techniques, linear algebra, calculus, and applied statistics. The proposed model employs a two-step selection process, namely a technical evaluation and a preference evaluation. At the technical evaluation stage, characteristics of each construction method are compared with the project's qualifying attributes (i.e. pipe diameter) to ensure technical soundness of the method. The preference evaluation process includes parameters considered to be controlled by the user (i.e. cost). The model determines the likelihood that each of the construction methods will satisfy the user objectives and rank it based on its utility value, which is equal to the sum of the product of each degree of user objective satisfaction and the probability of such an outcome. The proposed method represents a powerful decision-making model capable of addressing the complex and interacting technical, social, business, and risk aspects associated with many large trenchless technology projects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141894488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141894488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/40475(278)59
DO - 10.1061/40475(278)59
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:0141894488
SN - 9780784404751
T3 - Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World
SP - 543
EP - 553
BT - Proceedings of Construction Congress VI
T2 - Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World
Y2 - 20 February 2000 through 22 February 2000
ER -