More to say

Analyzing open-ended student responses to the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey

Micah Lande, Sarah Parikh, Sheri Sheppard, George Toye, Helen Chen, Krista Donaldson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A final, optional open-ended question in the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) that asked "Is there anything else you want to tell us that we didn't already cover?" elicited free form responses from 37 percent of the 4,266 survey participants. This paper explores their responses. After data cleaning, 880 responses were anonymized by individual and institution. The responses were rated on a numeric value (1-5) ranging from negative (criticizing) to neutral to positive (complementing). Responses were also coded using an emerging thematic coding scheme. The emergent topics were organized by whether the comments addressed school or individual issues. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the School category were: Advising, Co-op, Gender, Social and Teaching (Curriculum) and Teaching (Language). These responses were mostly found to the extremes, both positive and negative, of the scale of positive/negative comments. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the Individual Beliefs category were: (engineering as a) Calling, Challenge, Future, Lifestyle, Money and Understanding. These responses were mostly found to be neutral on the scale of positive/negative comments. Our analysis showed that the subjects' open-ended responses added qualitatively to student-voiced passions, concerns and experiences that could not be easily captured in a multiple choice question format.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Teaching
Students
Curricula
Cleaning

Keywords

  • Open-ended survey responses
  • Student academic experiences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

More to say : Analyzing open-ended student responses to the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey. / Lande, Micah; Parikh, Sarah; Sheppard, Sheri; Toye, George; Chen, Helen; Donaldson, Krista.

In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea936b9dc5bd4200b1e2d6daa0d44631,
title = "More to say: Analyzing open-ended student responses to the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey",
abstract = "A final, optional open-ended question in the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) that asked {"}Is there anything else you want to tell us that we didn't already cover?{"} elicited free form responses from 37 percent of the 4,266 survey participants. This paper explores their responses. After data cleaning, 880 responses were anonymized by individual and institution. The responses were rated on a numeric value (1-5) ranging from negative (criticizing) to neutral to positive (complementing). Responses were also coded using an emerging thematic coding scheme. The emergent topics were organized by whether the comments addressed school or individual issues. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the School category were: Advising, Co-op, Gender, Social and Teaching (Curriculum) and Teaching (Language). These responses were mostly found to the extremes, both positive and negative, of the scale of positive/negative comments. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the Individual Beliefs category were: (engineering as a) Calling, Challenge, Future, Lifestyle, Money and Understanding. These responses were mostly found to be neutral on the scale of positive/negative comments. Our analysis showed that the subjects' open-ended responses added qualitatively to student-voiced passions, concerns and experiences that could not be easily captured in a multiple choice question format.",
keywords = "Open-ended survey responses, Student academic experiences",
author = "Micah Lande and Sarah Parikh and Sheri Sheppard and George Toye and Helen Chen and Krista Donaldson",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings",
issn = "2153-5965",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - More to say

T2 - Analyzing open-ended student responses to the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey

AU - Lande, Micah

AU - Parikh, Sarah

AU - Sheppard, Sheri

AU - Toye, George

AU - Chen, Helen

AU - Donaldson, Krista

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - A final, optional open-ended question in the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) that asked "Is there anything else you want to tell us that we didn't already cover?" elicited free form responses from 37 percent of the 4,266 survey participants. This paper explores their responses. After data cleaning, 880 responses were anonymized by individual and institution. The responses were rated on a numeric value (1-5) ranging from negative (criticizing) to neutral to positive (complementing). Responses were also coded using an emerging thematic coding scheme. The emergent topics were organized by whether the comments addressed school or individual issues. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the School category were: Advising, Co-op, Gender, Social and Teaching (Curriculum) and Teaching (Language). These responses were mostly found to the extremes, both positive and negative, of the scale of positive/negative comments. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the Individual Beliefs category were: (engineering as a) Calling, Challenge, Future, Lifestyle, Money and Understanding. These responses were mostly found to be neutral on the scale of positive/negative comments. Our analysis showed that the subjects' open-ended responses added qualitatively to student-voiced passions, concerns and experiences that could not be easily captured in a multiple choice question format.

AB - A final, optional open-ended question in the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) that asked "Is there anything else you want to tell us that we didn't already cover?" elicited free form responses from 37 percent of the 4,266 survey participants. This paper explores their responses. After data cleaning, 880 responses were anonymized by individual and institution. The responses were rated on a numeric value (1-5) ranging from negative (criticizing) to neutral to positive (complementing). Responses were also coded using an emerging thematic coding scheme. The emergent topics were organized by whether the comments addressed school or individual issues. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the School category were: Advising, Co-op, Gender, Social and Teaching (Curriculum) and Teaching (Language). These responses were mostly found to the extremes, both positive and negative, of the scale of positive/negative comments. Topics suggested by the open-ended responses related to the Individual Beliefs category were: (engineering as a) Calling, Challenge, Future, Lifestyle, Money and Understanding. These responses were mostly found to be neutral on the scale of positive/negative comments. Our analysis showed that the subjects' open-ended responses added qualitatively to student-voiced passions, concerns and experiences that could not be easily captured in a multiple choice question format.

KW - Open-ended survey responses

KW - Student academic experiences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029068849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029068849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

SN - 2153-5965

ER -