Abstract
In Experiment I the relationship between response recall and the spacing of repetitions (lag), as a function of the retention interval, was investigated in the continuous paired-associate paradigm. At the short retention intervals (2 and 8 events) the lag function was nonmonotonic. At the longer retention intervals (32 and 64 events) the lag function increased monotonically. A version of encoding variability theory was used to explain these results. The theory was then tested in Experiments II and III. In the second experiment, using the Brown-Peterson paradigm, the lag function was monotonic for uncued recall, and nonmonotonic for cued recall. In the third experiment, using the continuous recognition memory procedure, the lag function was a nonmonotonic function of the lag interval between the first two presentations when the interval between the second and third presentations was short. Increasing the latter interval produced a lag function that was again monotonic. The results of the experiments support the theory which emphasizes the nature of the cues available for retrieval.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1976 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Cite this
Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. / Glenberg, Arthur.
In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1976, p. 1-16.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms
AU - Glenberg, Arthur
PY - 1976
Y1 - 1976
N2 - In Experiment I the relationship between response recall and the spacing of repetitions (lag), as a function of the retention interval, was investigated in the continuous paired-associate paradigm. At the short retention intervals (2 and 8 events) the lag function was nonmonotonic. At the longer retention intervals (32 and 64 events) the lag function increased monotonically. A version of encoding variability theory was used to explain these results. The theory was then tested in Experiments II and III. In the second experiment, using the Brown-Peterson paradigm, the lag function was monotonic for uncued recall, and nonmonotonic for cued recall. In the third experiment, using the continuous recognition memory procedure, the lag function was a nonmonotonic function of the lag interval between the first two presentations when the interval between the second and third presentations was short. Increasing the latter interval produced a lag function that was again monotonic. The results of the experiments support the theory which emphasizes the nature of the cues available for retrieval.
AB - In Experiment I the relationship between response recall and the spacing of repetitions (lag), as a function of the retention interval, was investigated in the continuous paired-associate paradigm. At the short retention intervals (2 and 8 events) the lag function was nonmonotonic. At the longer retention intervals (32 and 64 events) the lag function increased monotonically. A version of encoding variability theory was used to explain these results. The theory was then tested in Experiments II and III. In the second experiment, using the Brown-Peterson paradigm, the lag function was monotonic for uncued recall, and nonmonotonic for cued recall. In the third experiment, using the continuous recognition memory procedure, the lag function was a nonmonotonic function of the lag interval between the first two presentations when the interval between the second and third presentations was short. Increasing the latter interval produced a lag function that was again monotonic. The results of the experiments support the theory which emphasizes the nature of the cues available for retrieval.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001878290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001878290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90002-5
DO - 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90002-5
M3 - Article
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
JF - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
SN - 0749-596X
IS - 1
ER -