Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation

William Yost, Stanley Sheft, Janie Opie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to assess the effect of the rate of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) of a masker tone on detection of SAM of a probe tone (experiment 1) or on SAM-rate discrimination for the probe tone (experiment 2). When modulated at the same rate as the probe, the masker interfered with both the detection of probe modulation and the discrimination of the rate of probe modulation. The interference was obtained when the masker was either higher or lower in frequency than the probe (the probe and masker were separated by 2 oct). The amount of interference in detecting probe modulation (experiment 1) decreased as the common base rate of modulation was increased from 5 to 200 Hz. For rate discrimination (experiment 2), the amount of interference remained approximately the same for base rates of 2–40 Hz, the range over which rate discrimination was measured. In both experiments, the amount of interference was reduced when the masker was modulated at a different rate than the probe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2138-2147
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume86
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

discrimination
interference
modulation
probes
Modulation
Interference
Discrimination
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. / Yost, William; Sheft, Stanley; Opie, Janie.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 86, No. 6, 01.01.1989, p. 2138-2147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{460dcafcb1b649a8b006c93dc2065c19,
title = "Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation",
abstract = "Two experiments were conducted to assess the effect of the rate of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) of a masker tone on detection of SAM of a probe tone (experiment 1) or on SAM-rate discrimination for the probe tone (experiment 2). When modulated at the same rate as the probe, the masker interfered with both the detection of probe modulation and the discrimination of the rate of probe modulation. The interference was obtained when the masker was either higher or lower in frequency than the probe (the probe and masker were separated by 2 oct). The amount of interference in detecting probe modulation (experiment 1) decreased as the common base rate of modulation was increased from 5 to 200 Hz. For rate discrimination (experiment 2), the amount of interference remained approximately the same for base rates of 2–40 Hz, the range over which rate discrimination was measured. In both experiments, the amount of interference was reduced when the masker was modulated at a different rate than the probe.",
author = "William Yost and Stanley Sheft and Janie Opie",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.398474",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "2138--2147",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation

AU - Yost, William

AU - Sheft, Stanley

AU - Opie, Janie

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Two experiments were conducted to assess the effect of the rate of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) of a masker tone on detection of SAM of a probe tone (experiment 1) or on SAM-rate discrimination for the probe tone (experiment 2). When modulated at the same rate as the probe, the masker interfered with both the detection of probe modulation and the discrimination of the rate of probe modulation. The interference was obtained when the masker was either higher or lower in frequency than the probe (the probe and masker were separated by 2 oct). The amount of interference in detecting probe modulation (experiment 1) decreased as the common base rate of modulation was increased from 5 to 200 Hz. For rate discrimination (experiment 2), the amount of interference remained approximately the same for base rates of 2–40 Hz, the range over which rate discrimination was measured. In both experiments, the amount of interference was reduced when the masker was modulated at a different rate than the probe.

AB - Two experiments were conducted to assess the effect of the rate of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) of a masker tone on detection of SAM of a probe tone (experiment 1) or on SAM-rate discrimination for the probe tone (experiment 2). When modulated at the same rate as the probe, the masker interfered with both the detection of probe modulation and the discrimination of the rate of probe modulation. The interference was obtained when the masker was either higher or lower in frequency than the probe (the probe and masker were separated by 2 oct). The amount of interference in detecting probe modulation (experiment 1) decreased as the common base rate of modulation was increased from 5 to 200 Hz. For rate discrimination (experiment 2), the amount of interference remained approximately the same for base rates of 2–40 Hz, the range over which rate discrimination was measured. In both experiments, the amount of interference was reduced when the masker was modulated at a different rate than the probe.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024829035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024829035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.398474

DO - 10.1121/1.398474

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 2138

EP - 2147

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 6

ER -