Modern reproductive patterns associated with estrogen receptor positive but not negative breast cancer susceptibility

C Athena Aktipis, Bruce J. Ellis, Katherine K. Nishimura, Robert A. Hiatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has long been accepted that modern reproductive patterns are likely contributors to breast cancer susceptibility because of their influence on hormones such as estrogen and the importance of these hormones in breast cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess whether this 'evolutionary mismatch hypothesis' can explain susceptibility to both estrogen receptor positive (ER-positive) and estrogen receptor negative (ER-negative) cancer. Our meta-analysis includes a total of 33 studies and examines parity, age of first birth and age of menarche broken down by estrogen receptor status. We found that modern reproductive patterns are more closely linked to ER-positive than ER-negative breast cancer. Thus, the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis for breast cancer can account for ER-positive breast cancer susceptibility but not ER-negative breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbereou028
Pages (from-to)52-74
Number of pages23
JournalEvolution, Medicine and Public Health
Volume2015
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Estrogen Receptors
breast neoplasms
cancer
Breast Neoplasms
meta-analysis
hormone
Meta-Analysis
hormones
Hormones
menarche
Menarche
Birth Order
parity (reproduction)
Parity
estrogen receptors
estrogens
Estrogens
neoplasms
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Age of first birth
  • Breast cancer heterogeneity
  • Cancer evolution
  • Evolutionary mismatch
  • Hormoneassociated breast cancer
  • Parity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Modern reproductive patterns associated with estrogen receptor positive but not negative breast cancer susceptibility. / Aktipis, C Athena; Ellis, Bruce J.; Nishimura, Katherine K.; Hiatt, Robert A.

In: Evolution, Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 2015, No. 1, eou028, 01.01.2015, p. 52-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e44b4b871df84653867489cbebc5924b,
title = "Modern reproductive patterns associated with estrogen receptor positive but not negative breast cancer susceptibility",
abstract = "It has long been accepted that modern reproductive patterns are likely contributors to breast cancer susceptibility because of their influence on hormones such as estrogen and the importance of these hormones in breast cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess whether this 'evolutionary mismatch hypothesis' can explain susceptibility to both estrogen receptor positive (ER-positive) and estrogen receptor negative (ER-negative) cancer. Our meta-analysis includes a total of 33 studies and examines parity, age of first birth and age of menarche broken down by estrogen receptor status. We found that modern reproductive patterns are more closely linked to ER-positive than ER-negative breast cancer. Thus, the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis for breast cancer can account for ER-positive breast cancer susceptibility but not ER-negative breast cancer.",
keywords = "Age of first birth, Breast cancer heterogeneity, Cancer evolution, Evolutionary mismatch, Hormoneassociated breast cancer, Parity",
author = "Aktipis, {C Athena} and Ellis, {Bruce J.} and Nishimura, {Katherine K.} and Hiatt, {Robert A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/emph/eou028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2015",
pages = "52--74",
journal = "Evolution, Medicine and Public Health",
issn = "2050-6201",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modern reproductive patterns associated with estrogen receptor positive but not negative breast cancer susceptibility

AU - Aktipis, C Athena

AU - Ellis, Bruce J.

AU - Nishimura, Katherine K.

AU - Hiatt, Robert A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - It has long been accepted that modern reproductive patterns are likely contributors to breast cancer susceptibility because of their influence on hormones such as estrogen and the importance of these hormones in breast cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess whether this 'evolutionary mismatch hypothesis' can explain susceptibility to both estrogen receptor positive (ER-positive) and estrogen receptor negative (ER-negative) cancer. Our meta-analysis includes a total of 33 studies and examines parity, age of first birth and age of menarche broken down by estrogen receptor status. We found that modern reproductive patterns are more closely linked to ER-positive than ER-negative breast cancer. Thus, the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis for breast cancer can account for ER-positive breast cancer susceptibility but not ER-negative breast cancer.

AB - It has long been accepted that modern reproductive patterns are likely contributors to breast cancer susceptibility because of their influence on hormones such as estrogen and the importance of these hormones in breast cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess whether this 'evolutionary mismatch hypothesis' can explain susceptibility to both estrogen receptor positive (ER-positive) and estrogen receptor negative (ER-negative) cancer. Our meta-analysis includes a total of 33 studies and examines parity, age of first birth and age of menarche broken down by estrogen receptor status. We found that modern reproductive patterns are more closely linked to ER-positive than ER-negative breast cancer. Thus, the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis for breast cancer can account for ER-positive breast cancer susceptibility but not ER-negative breast cancer.

KW - Age of first birth

KW - Breast cancer heterogeneity

KW - Cancer evolution

KW - Evolutionary mismatch

KW - Hormoneassociated breast cancer

KW - Parity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942157525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942157525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/emph/eou028

DO - 10.1093/emph/eou028

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942157525

VL - 2015

SP - 52

EP - 74

JO - Evolution, Medicine and Public Health

JF - Evolution, Medicine and Public Health

SN - 2050-6201

IS - 1

M1 - eou028

ER -