Models of collaboration between nonprofit organizations

Kelly E. Proulx, Mark Hager, Kimberly C. Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose-Third sector organizations regularly innovate through collaboration with other organizations in order to secure resources and to increase the potential to more effectively meet each collaborator’s mission. Following a review of relevant literature, the purpose of this paper is to explore and document the variety of ways that third sector organizations collaborate with other nonprofit organizations. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reviews the literature regarding motivations to collaborate, barriers to collaboration, and ways to ensure that collaboration is successful. Drawing on exemplary cases of collaboration that applied for a national (USA) prize, the paper describes the range of collaborations that third sector organizations used to enhance their performance and productivity. Findings-The analysis culminates in eight models: the fully integrated merger, partially integrated merger, joint program office, joint partnership with affiliated programming, joint partnership for issue advocacy, joint partnership with a new formal organization, joint administrative operations, and confederation. Research limitations/implications-All cases are drawn from one country in one part of the world, the USA; some models will have less veracity in other countries or contexts, and the nonprofit sectors of other countries will likely generate additional kinds of models not anticipated by the USA cases. Second, the eight models generated by the method are the result of debate, deliberation, and iterative process carried out by two coders. Other coders employing the same analytic process might generate more or fewer models. Practical implications-Once nonprofit boards, staff, and other advocates understand the potential that can come with collaboration, blurring boundaries and giving up autonomy might not seem so intimidating. The practical value of our work is in reporting the wide array of options available to nonprofits-models that staff and board can use to plot their way forward. Social implications-The value of our work to research is identification of the assortment of ways that nonprofits collaborate. Future research may consider how any of the issues discussed in the literature-trust, co-opetition, resource dependence, network connectedness-vary or are conditioned by differences across these models of collaboration. Originality/value-The paper documents collaboration as a viable strategy for the enhancement of performance and productivity among third sector organizations in the USA. For each model described, the paper discusses the circumstances in which they might be used, as well as the challenges and advantages associated with implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)746-765
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 8 2014

Fingerprint

Nonprofit organization
Third sector
Mergers
Integrated
Staff
Productivity
Coopetition
Resource dependence
Programming
Resources
Connectedness
Advocacy
Design methodology
Nonprofit sector
Deliberation
Enhancement
Autonomy
Assortment

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Joint programming
  • Merger
  • Nonprofit organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Models of collaboration between nonprofit organizations. / Proulx, Kelly E.; Hager, Mark; Klein, Kimberly C.

In: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 63, No. 6, 08.07.2014, p. 746-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e455fdc0c30045efafb7cae0c58acc8f,
title = "Models of collaboration between nonprofit organizations",
abstract = "Purpose-Third sector organizations regularly innovate through collaboration with other organizations in order to secure resources and to increase the potential to more effectively meet each collaborator’s mission. Following a review of relevant literature, the purpose of this paper is to explore and document the variety of ways that third sector organizations collaborate with other nonprofit organizations. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reviews the literature regarding motivations to collaborate, barriers to collaboration, and ways to ensure that collaboration is successful. Drawing on exemplary cases of collaboration that applied for a national (USA) prize, the paper describes the range of collaborations that third sector organizations used to enhance their performance and productivity. Findings-The analysis culminates in eight models: the fully integrated merger, partially integrated merger, joint program office, joint partnership with affiliated programming, joint partnership for issue advocacy, joint partnership with a new formal organization, joint administrative operations, and confederation. Research limitations/implications-All cases are drawn from one country in one part of the world, the USA; some models will have less veracity in other countries or contexts, and the nonprofit sectors of other countries will likely generate additional kinds of models not anticipated by the USA cases. Second, the eight models generated by the method are the result of debate, deliberation, and iterative process carried out by two coders. Other coders employing the same analytic process might generate more or fewer models. Practical implications-Once nonprofit boards, staff, and other advocates understand the potential that can come with collaboration, blurring boundaries and giving up autonomy might not seem so intimidating. The practical value of our work is in reporting the wide array of options available to nonprofits-models that staff and board can use to plot their way forward. Social implications-The value of our work to research is identification of the assortment of ways that nonprofits collaborate. Future research may consider how any of the issues discussed in the literature-trust, co-opetition, resource dependence, network connectedness-vary or are conditioned by differences across these models of collaboration. Originality/value-The paper documents collaboration as a viable strategy for the enhancement of performance and productivity among third sector organizations in the USA. For each model described, the paper discusses the circumstances in which they might be used, as well as the challenges and advantages associated with implementation.",
keywords = "Collaboration, Joint programming, Merger, Nonprofit organizations",
author = "Proulx, {Kelly E.} and Mark Hager and Klein, {Kimberly C.}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "746--765",
journal = "International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management",
issn = "1741-0401",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Models of collaboration between nonprofit organizations

AU - Proulx, Kelly E.

AU - Hager, Mark

AU - Klein, Kimberly C.

PY - 2014/7/8

Y1 - 2014/7/8

N2 - Purpose-Third sector organizations regularly innovate through collaboration with other organizations in order to secure resources and to increase the potential to more effectively meet each collaborator’s mission. Following a review of relevant literature, the purpose of this paper is to explore and document the variety of ways that third sector organizations collaborate with other nonprofit organizations. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reviews the literature regarding motivations to collaborate, barriers to collaboration, and ways to ensure that collaboration is successful. Drawing on exemplary cases of collaboration that applied for a national (USA) prize, the paper describes the range of collaborations that third sector organizations used to enhance their performance and productivity. Findings-The analysis culminates in eight models: the fully integrated merger, partially integrated merger, joint program office, joint partnership with affiliated programming, joint partnership for issue advocacy, joint partnership with a new formal organization, joint administrative operations, and confederation. Research limitations/implications-All cases are drawn from one country in one part of the world, the USA; some models will have less veracity in other countries or contexts, and the nonprofit sectors of other countries will likely generate additional kinds of models not anticipated by the USA cases. Second, the eight models generated by the method are the result of debate, deliberation, and iterative process carried out by two coders. Other coders employing the same analytic process might generate more or fewer models. Practical implications-Once nonprofit boards, staff, and other advocates understand the potential that can come with collaboration, blurring boundaries and giving up autonomy might not seem so intimidating. The practical value of our work is in reporting the wide array of options available to nonprofits-models that staff and board can use to plot their way forward. Social implications-The value of our work to research is identification of the assortment of ways that nonprofits collaborate. Future research may consider how any of the issues discussed in the literature-trust, co-opetition, resource dependence, network connectedness-vary or are conditioned by differences across these models of collaboration. Originality/value-The paper documents collaboration as a viable strategy for the enhancement of performance and productivity among third sector organizations in the USA. For each model described, the paper discusses the circumstances in which they might be used, as well as the challenges and advantages associated with implementation.

AB - Purpose-Third sector organizations regularly innovate through collaboration with other organizations in order to secure resources and to increase the potential to more effectively meet each collaborator’s mission. Following a review of relevant literature, the purpose of this paper is to explore and document the variety of ways that third sector organizations collaborate with other nonprofit organizations. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reviews the literature regarding motivations to collaborate, barriers to collaboration, and ways to ensure that collaboration is successful. Drawing on exemplary cases of collaboration that applied for a national (USA) prize, the paper describes the range of collaborations that third sector organizations used to enhance their performance and productivity. Findings-The analysis culminates in eight models: the fully integrated merger, partially integrated merger, joint program office, joint partnership with affiliated programming, joint partnership for issue advocacy, joint partnership with a new formal organization, joint administrative operations, and confederation. Research limitations/implications-All cases are drawn from one country in one part of the world, the USA; some models will have less veracity in other countries or contexts, and the nonprofit sectors of other countries will likely generate additional kinds of models not anticipated by the USA cases. Second, the eight models generated by the method are the result of debate, deliberation, and iterative process carried out by two coders. Other coders employing the same analytic process might generate more or fewer models. Practical implications-Once nonprofit boards, staff, and other advocates understand the potential that can come with collaboration, blurring boundaries and giving up autonomy might not seem so intimidating. The practical value of our work is in reporting the wide array of options available to nonprofits-models that staff and board can use to plot their way forward. Social implications-The value of our work to research is identification of the assortment of ways that nonprofits collaborate. Future research may consider how any of the issues discussed in the literature-trust, co-opetition, resource dependence, network connectedness-vary or are conditioned by differences across these models of collaboration. Originality/value-The paper documents collaboration as a viable strategy for the enhancement of performance and productivity among third sector organizations in the USA. For each model described, the paper discusses the circumstances in which they might be used, as well as the challenges and advantages associated with implementation.

KW - Collaboration

KW - Joint programming

KW - Merger

KW - Nonprofit organizations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926643507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926643507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0121

DO - 10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0121

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926643507

VL - 63

SP - 746

EP - 765

JO - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

JF - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

SN - 1741-0401

IS - 6

ER -