Modeling indivisible demand

Sanghak Lee, Greg M. Allenby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disaggregate demand in the marketplace exists on a grid determined by the package sizes offered by manufacturers and retailers. Although consumers may want to purchase a continuous-valued amount of a product, realized purchases are constrained by available packages. This constraint might not be problematic for high-volume demand, but it is potentially troubling when demand is small. Despite the prevalence of packaging constraints on choice, economic models of choice have been slow to deal with their effects on parameter estimates and policy implications. In this paper we propose a general framework for dealing with indivisible demand in economic models of choice, and we show how to estimate model parameters using Bayesian methods. Analyses of simulated data and a scanner-panel data set of yogurt purchases indicate that ignoring packaging constraints can bias parameter estimates and measures of model fit, which results in the inaccurate measures of metrics such as price elasticity and compensating value. We also show that a portion of nonpurchase in the data (e.g., 2.27% for Yoplait Original) reflects the restriction of indivisibility, not the lack of preference. The importance of demand indivisibility is also highlighted by the counterfactual study where the removal of the smallest package size (i.e., 4 oz) mainly results in nonpurchase in the yogurt category instead of switching to larger package sizes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)364-381
Number of pages18
JournalMarketing Science
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Modeling
Purchase
Indivisibility
Packaging
Bayesian methods
Policy implications
Retailers
Scanner panel data
Price elasticity
Grid

Keywords

  • Bayesian error augmentation
  • Direct utility model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

Modeling indivisible demand. / Lee, Sanghak; Allenby, Greg M.

In: Marketing Science, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 364-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Sanghak ; Allenby, Greg M. / Modeling indivisible demand. In: Marketing Science. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 364-381.
@article{0b92d05f553a41d7b5b8590813bb4204,
title = "Modeling indivisible demand",
abstract = "Disaggregate demand in the marketplace exists on a grid determined by the package sizes offered by manufacturers and retailers. Although consumers may want to purchase a continuous-valued amount of a product, realized purchases are constrained by available packages. This constraint might not be problematic for high-volume demand, but it is potentially troubling when demand is small. Despite the prevalence of packaging constraints on choice, economic models of choice have been slow to deal with their effects on parameter estimates and policy implications. In this paper we propose a general framework for dealing with indivisible demand in economic models of choice, and we show how to estimate model parameters using Bayesian methods. Analyses of simulated data and a scanner-panel data set of yogurt purchases indicate that ignoring packaging constraints can bias parameter estimates and measures of model fit, which results in the inaccurate measures of metrics such as price elasticity and compensating value. We also show that a portion of nonpurchase in the data (e.g., 2.27{\%} for Yoplait Original) reflects the restriction of indivisibility, not the lack of preference. The importance of demand indivisibility is also highlighted by the counterfactual study where the removal of the smallest package size (i.e., 4 oz) mainly results in nonpurchase in the yogurt category instead of switching to larger package sizes.",
keywords = "Bayesian error augmentation, Direct utility model",
author = "Sanghak Lee and Allenby, {Greg M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/mksc.2013.0829",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "364--381",
journal = "Marketing Science",
issn = "0732-2399",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling indivisible demand

AU - Lee, Sanghak

AU - Allenby, Greg M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Disaggregate demand in the marketplace exists on a grid determined by the package sizes offered by manufacturers and retailers. Although consumers may want to purchase a continuous-valued amount of a product, realized purchases are constrained by available packages. This constraint might not be problematic for high-volume demand, but it is potentially troubling when demand is small. Despite the prevalence of packaging constraints on choice, economic models of choice have been slow to deal with their effects on parameter estimates and policy implications. In this paper we propose a general framework for dealing with indivisible demand in economic models of choice, and we show how to estimate model parameters using Bayesian methods. Analyses of simulated data and a scanner-panel data set of yogurt purchases indicate that ignoring packaging constraints can bias parameter estimates and measures of model fit, which results in the inaccurate measures of metrics such as price elasticity and compensating value. We also show that a portion of nonpurchase in the data (e.g., 2.27% for Yoplait Original) reflects the restriction of indivisibility, not the lack of preference. The importance of demand indivisibility is also highlighted by the counterfactual study where the removal of the smallest package size (i.e., 4 oz) mainly results in nonpurchase in the yogurt category instead of switching to larger package sizes.

AB - Disaggregate demand in the marketplace exists on a grid determined by the package sizes offered by manufacturers and retailers. Although consumers may want to purchase a continuous-valued amount of a product, realized purchases are constrained by available packages. This constraint might not be problematic for high-volume demand, but it is potentially troubling when demand is small. Despite the prevalence of packaging constraints on choice, economic models of choice have been slow to deal with their effects on parameter estimates and policy implications. In this paper we propose a general framework for dealing with indivisible demand in economic models of choice, and we show how to estimate model parameters using Bayesian methods. Analyses of simulated data and a scanner-panel data set of yogurt purchases indicate that ignoring packaging constraints can bias parameter estimates and measures of model fit, which results in the inaccurate measures of metrics such as price elasticity and compensating value. We also show that a portion of nonpurchase in the data (e.g., 2.27% for Yoplait Original) reflects the restriction of indivisibility, not the lack of preference. The importance of demand indivisibility is also highlighted by the counterfactual study where the removal of the smallest package size (i.e., 4 oz) mainly results in nonpurchase in the yogurt category instead of switching to larger package sizes.

KW - Bayesian error augmentation

KW - Direct utility model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901070174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901070174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/mksc.2013.0829

DO - 10.1287/mksc.2013.0829

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901070174

VL - 33

SP - 364

EP - 381

JO - Marketing Science

JF - Marketing Science

SN - 0732-2399

IS - 3

ER -