Abstract

A current concern in the economics of natural resources is the role of adaptation in moderating the economic impact of exogenous changes in the resilience of natural resource systems. We develop a bioeconomic model of the exploitation of a renewable resource that can exist in multiple states. We then use this to consider the value of adaptive over non-adaptive policies when there is a change in state, and there are fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. We take adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the current state of the system, and the conditioning effect that has on the expected future state of the system. We take non-adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the long run average state of the system. We find that whether adaptive or non-adaptive policies dominate depends on the fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. If the fixed costs of closure are very low, non-adaptive policies dominate. However, if the fixed costs of closure are high, adaptive policies are preferred. We use a numerical example based on the Peruvian anchoveta fishery to illustrate the results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-386
Number of pages9
JournalEcological Economics
Volume116
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

resource
modeling
cost
natural resource
renewable resource
economic impact
conditioning
policy
Resources
Modeling
fishery
Fixed costs
economics
Natural resources
Closure

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Bioeconomic model
  • Natural resources
  • Regime switching
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Modeling adaptation in multi-state resource systems. / Baggio, Michele; Perrings, Charles.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 116, 01.08.2015, p. 378-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e6b3c020c2b45608c2d2021e481892c,
title = "Modeling adaptation in multi-state resource systems",
abstract = "A current concern in the economics of natural resources is the role of adaptation in moderating the economic impact of exogenous changes in the resilience of natural resource systems. We develop a bioeconomic model of the exploitation of a renewable resource that can exist in multiple states. We then use this to consider the value of adaptive over non-adaptive policies when there is a change in state, and there are fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. We take adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the current state of the system, and the conditioning effect that has on the expected future state of the system. We take non-adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the long run average state of the system. We find that whether adaptive or non-adaptive policies dominate depends on the fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. If the fixed costs of closure are very low, non-adaptive policies dominate. However, if the fixed costs of closure are high, adaptive policies are preferred. We use a numerical example based on the Peruvian anchoveta fishery to illustrate the results.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Bioeconomic model, Natural resources, Regime switching, Resilience",
author = "Michele Baggio and Charles Perrings",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "378--386",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling adaptation in multi-state resource systems

AU - Baggio, Michele

AU - Perrings, Charles

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - A current concern in the economics of natural resources is the role of adaptation in moderating the economic impact of exogenous changes in the resilience of natural resource systems. We develop a bioeconomic model of the exploitation of a renewable resource that can exist in multiple states. We then use this to consider the value of adaptive over non-adaptive policies when there is a change in state, and there are fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. We take adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the current state of the system, and the conditioning effect that has on the expected future state of the system. We take non-adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the long run average state of the system. We find that whether adaptive or non-adaptive policies dominate depends on the fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. If the fixed costs of closure are very low, non-adaptive policies dominate. However, if the fixed costs of closure are high, adaptive policies are preferred. We use a numerical example based on the Peruvian anchoveta fishery to illustrate the results.

AB - A current concern in the economics of natural resources is the role of adaptation in moderating the economic impact of exogenous changes in the resilience of natural resource systems. We develop a bioeconomic model of the exploitation of a renewable resource that can exist in multiple states. We then use this to consider the value of adaptive over non-adaptive policies when there is a change in state, and there are fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. We take adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the current state of the system, and the conditioning effect that has on the expected future state of the system. We take non-adaptive policies to be those that base extraction on the long run average state of the system. We find that whether adaptive or non-adaptive policies dominate depends on the fixed costs of starting or stopping extraction. If the fixed costs of closure are very low, non-adaptive policies dominate. However, if the fixed costs of closure are high, adaptive policies are preferred. We use a numerical example based on the Peruvian anchoveta fishery to illustrate the results.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Bioeconomic model

KW - Natural resources

KW - Regime switching

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931272012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931272012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.016

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 378

EP - 386

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -