Model-measurement consistency and limits of bioaerosol abundance over the continental United States

Maria A. Zawadowicz, Karl D. Froyd, Anne E. Perring, Daniel M. Murphy, Dominick V. Spracklen, Colette L. Heald, Peter R. Buseck, Daniel J. Cziczo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Due to low concentrations and chemical complexity, in situ observations of bioaerosol are geographically and temporally sparse, and this limits the accuracy of current emissions inventories. In this study, we apply a new methodology, including corrections for misidentification of mineral dust, to measurements of single particles over four airborne sampling campaigns to derive vertical profiles of bioaerosol over the continental United States. The new methodology is based on single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS); it can extend historic datasets to include measurements of bioaerosol, it allows comparisons to other techniques, and it generally agrees with a global aerosol model. In the locations sampled, bioaerosols were at least a factor of 10 less abundant than mineral dust. Below 2 km, bioaerosol concentrations were measured between 6×103 and 2×104 m-3. Between 2 and 8 km, bioaerosol concentrations were between 0 and 2 × 104 m-3, and above 8 km, bioaerosol concentrations were between 0 and 1 × 103 m-3. Between 30 % and 80 % of single bioaerosol particles detected were internally mixed with dust. A direct comparison of the SPMS methodology with a co-located wideband integrated bioaerosol sensor (WIB) fluorescence sensor on a mountaintop site showed agreement to within a factor of 3 over the common size range.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13859-13870
Number of pages12
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume19
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 19 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Model-measurement consistency and limits of bioaerosol abundance over the continental United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this