Mobile Augmented Reality to Influence Design and Constructability Review Sessions

Suleiman Alsafouri, Steven Ayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In modern construction projects, architects, engineers, contractors, and owners who are actively involved in projects use different methods of visualization, such as building information modeling (BIM), physical mock-ups, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), to support the conceptualizations, representations, and final appearances of their design ideas. These approaches can support design visualization for decision making before final construction. However, unlike BIM visualization where users can only interact with a virtual environment and physical mock-ups where the interaction is only with physical design components, AR can merge physical conditions with computer-generated visual information. This may aid professionals in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industries during design and constructability review sessions. This research studied the use of AR through a structured design review activity involving current industry practitioners in design and constructability review sessions and tested whether the combined virtual-physical nature of AR facilitates the same actions and outcomes suggested by prior work that used virtual reality-based mock-ups or physical mock-ups. In addition, this study identified and analyzed various actions such as decision making, problem solving, and design alternatives that occur as users interact with AR on different mobile computers. This analysis provides an understanding of how different mobile computers, such as wearables and handheld devices showing the same technical AR environment, can lead to different actions among users. This research found that AR can facilitate some of the actions of virtual reality and physical mock-ups in design and constructability review sessions, including decision making, design alternatives, and descriptive, explanative, and problem-solving actions. In addition, different mobile computers led to different observed actions during the design review sessions. For example, handheld devices between 15.24 cm (6 in.) and 25.5 cm (10 in.) enabled more decision-making actions than any other device tested. As additional testing is completed, future findings may be compared with those presented in this work to determine the actions that are consistently seen with AR in design and constructability review sessions. Eventually, this may provide a valuable tool to allow future researchers and practitioners to strategically plan for AR technology use based on what specific human actions are desirable for a given application.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04019016
JournalJournal of Architectural Engineering
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Augmented reality
Mockups
Virtual reality
Decision making
Visualization
Augmented Reality
Construction industry
Physical
Contractors
Engineers

Keywords

  • Augmented reality
  • Building information modeling
  • Design and constructability review
  • Mobile computers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

Mobile Augmented Reality to Influence Design and Constructability Review Sessions. / Alsafouri, Suleiman; Ayer, Steven.

In: Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 3, 04019016, 01.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be1d89b1f3d44904a0a0d1d2855aefe3,
title = "Mobile Augmented Reality to Influence Design and Constructability Review Sessions",
abstract = "In modern construction projects, architects, engineers, contractors, and owners who are actively involved in projects use different methods of visualization, such as building information modeling (BIM), physical mock-ups, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), to support the conceptualizations, representations, and final appearances of their design ideas. These approaches can support design visualization for decision making before final construction. However, unlike BIM visualization where users can only interact with a virtual environment and physical mock-ups where the interaction is only with physical design components, AR can merge physical conditions with computer-generated visual information. This may aid professionals in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industries during design and constructability review sessions. This research studied the use of AR through a structured design review activity involving current industry practitioners in design and constructability review sessions and tested whether the combined virtual-physical nature of AR facilitates the same actions and outcomes suggested by prior work that used virtual reality-based mock-ups or physical mock-ups. In addition, this study identified and analyzed various actions such as decision making, problem solving, and design alternatives that occur as users interact with AR on different mobile computers. This analysis provides an understanding of how different mobile computers, such as wearables and handheld devices showing the same technical AR environment, can lead to different actions among users. This research found that AR can facilitate some of the actions of virtual reality and physical mock-ups in design and constructability review sessions, including decision making, design alternatives, and descriptive, explanative, and problem-solving actions. In addition, different mobile computers led to different observed actions during the design review sessions. For example, handheld devices between 15.24 cm (6 in.) and 25.5 cm (10 in.) enabled more decision-making actions than any other device tested. As additional testing is completed, future findings may be compared with those presented in this work to determine the actions that are consistently seen with AR in design and constructability review sessions. Eventually, this may provide a valuable tool to allow future researchers and practitioners to strategically plan for AR technology use based on what specific human actions are desirable for a given application.",
keywords = "Augmented reality, Building information modeling, Design and constructability review, Mobile computers",
author = "Suleiman Alsafouri and Steven Ayer",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000362",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
journal = "Journal of Architectural Engineering",
issn = "1076-0431",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobile Augmented Reality to Influence Design and Constructability Review Sessions

AU - Alsafouri, Suleiman

AU - Ayer, Steven

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - In modern construction projects, architects, engineers, contractors, and owners who are actively involved in projects use different methods of visualization, such as building information modeling (BIM), physical mock-ups, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), to support the conceptualizations, representations, and final appearances of their design ideas. These approaches can support design visualization for decision making before final construction. However, unlike BIM visualization where users can only interact with a virtual environment and physical mock-ups where the interaction is only with physical design components, AR can merge physical conditions with computer-generated visual information. This may aid professionals in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industries during design and constructability review sessions. This research studied the use of AR through a structured design review activity involving current industry practitioners in design and constructability review sessions and tested whether the combined virtual-physical nature of AR facilitates the same actions and outcomes suggested by prior work that used virtual reality-based mock-ups or physical mock-ups. In addition, this study identified and analyzed various actions such as decision making, problem solving, and design alternatives that occur as users interact with AR on different mobile computers. This analysis provides an understanding of how different mobile computers, such as wearables and handheld devices showing the same technical AR environment, can lead to different actions among users. This research found that AR can facilitate some of the actions of virtual reality and physical mock-ups in design and constructability review sessions, including decision making, design alternatives, and descriptive, explanative, and problem-solving actions. In addition, different mobile computers led to different observed actions during the design review sessions. For example, handheld devices between 15.24 cm (6 in.) and 25.5 cm (10 in.) enabled more decision-making actions than any other device tested. As additional testing is completed, future findings may be compared with those presented in this work to determine the actions that are consistently seen with AR in design and constructability review sessions. Eventually, this may provide a valuable tool to allow future researchers and practitioners to strategically plan for AR technology use based on what specific human actions are desirable for a given application.

AB - In modern construction projects, architects, engineers, contractors, and owners who are actively involved in projects use different methods of visualization, such as building information modeling (BIM), physical mock-ups, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), to support the conceptualizations, representations, and final appearances of their design ideas. These approaches can support design visualization for decision making before final construction. However, unlike BIM visualization where users can only interact with a virtual environment and physical mock-ups where the interaction is only with physical design components, AR can merge physical conditions with computer-generated visual information. This may aid professionals in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industries during design and constructability review sessions. This research studied the use of AR through a structured design review activity involving current industry practitioners in design and constructability review sessions and tested whether the combined virtual-physical nature of AR facilitates the same actions and outcomes suggested by prior work that used virtual reality-based mock-ups or physical mock-ups. In addition, this study identified and analyzed various actions such as decision making, problem solving, and design alternatives that occur as users interact with AR on different mobile computers. This analysis provides an understanding of how different mobile computers, such as wearables and handheld devices showing the same technical AR environment, can lead to different actions among users. This research found that AR can facilitate some of the actions of virtual reality and physical mock-ups in design and constructability review sessions, including decision making, design alternatives, and descriptive, explanative, and problem-solving actions. In addition, different mobile computers led to different observed actions during the design review sessions. For example, handheld devices between 15.24 cm (6 in.) and 25.5 cm (10 in.) enabled more decision-making actions than any other device tested. As additional testing is completed, future findings may be compared with those presented in this work to determine the actions that are consistently seen with AR in design and constructability review sessions. Eventually, this may provide a valuable tool to allow future researchers and practitioners to strategically plan for AR technology use based on what specific human actions are desirable for a given application.

KW - Augmented reality

KW - Building information modeling

KW - Design and constructability review

KW - Mobile computers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067698194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067698194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000362

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000362

M3 - Article

VL - 25

JO - Journal of Architectural Engineering

JF - Journal of Architectural Engineering

SN - 1076-0431

IS - 3

M1 - 04019016

ER -