Abstract
Previous research has shown that institutional factors, particularly 'direct democracy', along with racial context, shape policy outcomes in the fifty American states. But less is understood about the impact of such factors on attitudes towards government of racial and ethnic minorities. The passage of ballot initiatives targeting minority interests might be expected to have a negative effect on these groups. This study considers the impact of institutional and social context on attitudes about government responsiveness (external efficacy), drawing on pooled NES survey data from 1988-98 merged with state level data. Consistent with previous research, which was based on a single year, there is strong evidence that citizens in states with frequent exposure to direct democracy are more likely to perceive that government is responsive to their needs. At the same time, direct democracy did not have the hypothesized detrimental impact on racial and ethnic group attitudes towards government in general. State racial context also did not have a measurable impact on individual-level attitudes. Regardless of state environmental contexts, however, racial and ethnic minorities (with the exception of Latinos) reported less confidence in government than whites. The findings have broader implications, particularly given the growing racial and ethnic diversity and the ongoing politics of democratic inclusion in America.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 109-121 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | British Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
Cite this
Minority Voices and Citizen Attitudes about Government Responsiveness in the American States : Do Social and Institutional Context Matter? / Hero, Rodney; Tolbert, Caroline J.
In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 109-121.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Minority Voices and Citizen Attitudes about Government Responsiveness in the American States
T2 - Do Social and Institutional Context Matter?
AU - Hero, Rodney
AU - Tolbert, Caroline J.
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - Previous research has shown that institutional factors, particularly 'direct democracy', along with racial context, shape policy outcomes in the fifty American states. But less is understood about the impact of such factors on attitudes towards government of racial and ethnic minorities. The passage of ballot initiatives targeting minority interests might be expected to have a negative effect on these groups. This study considers the impact of institutional and social context on attitudes about government responsiveness (external efficacy), drawing on pooled NES survey data from 1988-98 merged with state level data. Consistent with previous research, which was based on a single year, there is strong evidence that citizens in states with frequent exposure to direct democracy are more likely to perceive that government is responsive to their needs. At the same time, direct democracy did not have the hypothesized detrimental impact on racial and ethnic group attitudes towards government in general. State racial context also did not have a measurable impact on individual-level attitudes. Regardless of state environmental contexts, however, racial and ethnic minorities (with the exception of Latinos) reported less confidence in government than whites. The findings have broader implications, particularly given the growing racial and ethnic diversity and the ongoing politics of democratic inclusion in America.
AB - Previous research has shown that institutional factors, particularly 'direct democracy', along with racial context, shape policy outcomes in the fifty American states. But less is understood about the impact of such factors on attitudes towards government of racial and ethnic minorities. The passage of ballot initiatives targeting minority interests might be expected to have a negative effect on these groups. This study considers the impact of institutional and social context on attitudes about government responsiveness (external efficacy), drawing on pooled NES survey data from 1988-98 merged with state level data. Consistent with previous research, which was based on a single year, there is strong evidence that citizens in states with frequent exposure to direct democracy are more likely to perceive that government is responsive to their needs. At the same time, direct democracy did not have the hypothesized detrimental impact on racial and ethnic group attitudes towards government in general. State racial context also did not have a measurable impact on individual-level attitudes. Regardless of state environmental contexts, however, racial and ethnic minorities (with the exception of Latinos) reported less confidence in government than whites. The findings have broader implications, particularly given the growing racial and ethnic diversity and the ongoing politics of democratic inclusion in America.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347931984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347931984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0007123403000371
DO - 10.1017/S0007123403000371
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0347931984
VL - 34
SP - 109
EP - 121
JO - British Journal of Political Science
JF - British Journal of Political Science
SN - 0007-1234
IS - 1
ER -