Minding the Time

A Critical Look at Longitudinal Design and Data Analysis in Quantitative Public Management Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public management scholars are looking to longitudinal research designs and data to help overcome the many limitations associated with cross-sectional research. However, far less attention has been given to time itself as a research lens for scholars to consider. This article seeks to integrate time as a construct of theoretical importance into a discussion of longitudinal design, data, and public management research. First, I discuss the relative advantages of longitudinal design and data, but also the challenges, limitations, and issues researchers need to consider. Second, I consider the importance of time as a theoretical construct of interest in the pursuit of longitudinal public management research. Third, I offer a brief look at the use of longitudinal design and panel data analyses in the current public management literature. The overview demonstrates a notable absence of public management research considering the attitudes, motives, perceptions, and experiences of individual public employees and managers. Finally, I consider why there are so few longitudinal studies of public employees and point out the issues public management researchers interested in individual employee-level phenomena need to consider when advancing their own longitudinal research designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-244
Number of pages26
JournalReview of Public Personnel Administration
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

public management
data analysis
employee
research planning
time
Public management
Management research
longitudinal study
manager
experience

Keywords

  • cross-sectional data
  • longitudinal data
  • public management theory
  • survey research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{2d1bd6f00db34c48a2ba691fd3d9fd31,
title = "Minding the Time: A Critical Look at Longitudinal Design and Data Analysis in Quantitative Public Management Research",
abstract = "Public management scholars are looking to longitudinal research designs and data to help overcome the many limitations associated with cross-sectional research. However, far less attention has been given to time itself as a research lens for scholars to consider. This article seeks to integrate time as a construct of theoretical importance into a discussion of longitudinal design, data, and public management research. First, I discuss the relative advantages of longitudinal design and data, but also the challenges, limitations, and issues researchers need to consider. Second, I consider the importance of time as a theoretical construct of interest in the pursuit of longitudinal public management research. Third, I offer a brief look at the use of longitudinal design and panel data analyses in the current public management literature. The overview demonstrates a notable absence of public management research considering the attitudes, motives, perceptions, and experiences of individual public employees and managers. Finally, I consider why there are so few longitudinal studies of public employees and point out the issues public management researchers interested in individual employee-level phenomena need to consider when advancing their own longitudinal research designs.",
keywords = "cross-sectional data, longitudinal data, public management theory, survey research",
author = "Justin Stritch",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0734371X17697117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "219--244",
journal = "Review of Public Personnel Administration",
issn = "0734-371X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minding the Time

T2 - A Critical Look at Longitudinal Design and Data Analysis in Quantitative Public Management Research

AU - Stritch, Justin

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Public management scholars are looking to longitudinal research designs and data to help overcome the many limitations associated with cross-sectional research. However, far less attention has been given to time itself as a research lens for scholars to consider. This article seeks to integrate time as a construct of theoretical importance into a discussion of longitudinal design, data, and public management research. First, I discuss the relative advantages of longitudinal design and data, but also the challenges, limitations, and issues researchers need to consider. Second, I consider the importance of time as a theoretical construct of interest in the pursuit of longitudinal public management research. Third, I offer a brief look at the use of longitudinal design and panel data analyses in the current public management literature. The overview demonstrates a notable absence of public management research considering the attitudes, motives, perceptions, and experiences of individual public employees and managers. Finally, I consider why there are so few longitudinal studies of public employees and point out the issues public management researchers interested in individual employee-level phenomena need to consider when advancing their own longitudinal research designs.

AB - Public management scholars are looking to longitudinal research designs and data to help overcome the many limitations associated with cross-sectional research. However, far less attention has been given to time itself as a research lens for scholars to consider. This article seeks to integrate time as a construct of theoretical importance into a discussion of longitudinal design, data, and public management research. First, I discuss the relative advantages of longitudinal design and data, but also the challenges, limitations, and issues researchers need to consider. Second, I consider the importance of time as a theoretical construct of interest in the pursuit of longitudinal public management research. Third, I offer a brief look at the use of longitudinal design and panel data analyses in the current public management literature. The overview demonstrates a notable absence of public management research considering the attitudes, motives, perceptions, and experiences of individual public employees and managers. Finally, I consider why there are so few longitudinal studies of public employees and point out the issues public management researchers interested in individual employee-level phenomena need to consider when advancing their own longitudinal research designs.

KW - cross-sectional data

KW - longitudinal data

KW - public management theory

KW - survey research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019376583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019376583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0734371X17697117

DO - 10.1177/0734371X17697117

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 219

EP - 244

JO - Review of Public Personnel Administration

JF - Review of Public Personnel Administration

SN - 0734-371X

IS - 2

ER -