Minding the gap: Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology

Clive D.I. Wynne; Johan J. Bolhuis

doi:10.1017/S0140525X08003786

Minding the gap: Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology

Clive D.I. Wynne, Johan J. Bolhuis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The prevailing view that there is significant cognitive continuity between humans and other animals is a result of misinterpretations of the role of evolution, combined with anthropomorphism. This combination has often resulted in an over-interpretation of data from animal experiments. Comparative psychology should do what the name indicates: study the cognitive capacities of different species empirically, without naive evolutionary presuppositions.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	152-153
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	31
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08003786
State	Published - Apr 1 2008
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X08003786

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Minding the gap: Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Wynne, C. D. I., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2008). Minding the gap: Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(2), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08003786

@article{499d173e62d24f4180dd8eb827400135,

title = "Minding the gap: Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology",

abstract = "The prevailing view that there is significant cognitive continuity between humans and other animals is a result of misinterpretations of the role of evolution, combined with anthropomorphism. This combination has often resulted in an over-interpretation of data from animal experiments. Comparative psychology should do what the name indicates: study the cognitive capacities of different species empirically, without naive evolutionary presuppositions.",

author = "Wynne, {Clive D.I.} and Bolhuis, {Johan J.}",

year = "2008",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X08003786",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "31",

pages = "152--153",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minding the gap

T2 - Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology

AU - Wynne, Clive D.I.

AU - Bolhuis, Johan J.

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - The prevailing view that there is significant cognitive continuity between humans and other animals is a result of misinterpretations of the role of evolution, combined with anthropomorphism. This combination has often resulted in an over-interpretation of data from animal experiments. Comparative psychology should do what the name indicates: study the cognitive capacities of different species empirically, without naive evolutionary presuppositions.

AB - The prevailing view that there is significant cognitive continuity between humans and other animals is a result of misinterpretations of the role of evolution, combined with anthropomorphism. This combination has often resulted in an over-interpretation of data from animal experiments. Comparative psychology should do what the name indicates: study the cognitive capacities of different species empirically, without naive evolutionary presuppositions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43749098077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43749098077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X08003786

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X08003786

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:43749098077

VL - 31

SP - 152

EP - 153

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 2

ER -