TY - JOUR
T1 - Metrics for measuring broadening participation in NSF programs
AU - Fortenberry, Norman L.
AU - Cady, Elizabeth T.
AU - Bramwell, Fitzgerald
AU - Clewell, Beatriz Chu
AU - Flaris, Vicki
AU - Jolly, Eric
AU - Martin, Dianne
AU - MacDonald, Heather
AU - Poston, Muriel
AU - Rodriguez, Armando
AU - Spalter-Roth, Roberta
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The National Science Foundation (NSF) has long encouraged its grantees to consider individual and institutional diversity in their activities, specifically through the Broader Impacts merit review criterion. A group representative of the NSF grantee community participated in a workshop to develop metrics by which grantee institutions and individual principal investigators could document their efforts to broaden participation in science and engineering by persons drawn from populations underrepresented in these fields, as well as from institutions that underparticipate in NSF grantee programs. The group proposed that the NSF require its grantee institutions to submit annually and for public display (1) their most recent affirmative action plans, including equal employment opportunity information and utilization reports; and (2) indication of specific collaborations with nonresearch institutions in NSF programs. Deliberations and recommendations of the working group are presented in this article.
AB - The National Science Foundation (NSF) has long encouraged its grantees to consider individual and institutional diversity in their activities, specifically through the Broader Impacts merit review criterion. A group representative of the NSF grantee community participated in a workshop to develop metrics by which grantee institutions and individual principal investigators could document their efforts to broaden participation in science and engineering by persons drawn from populations underrepresented in these fields, as well as from institutions that underparticipate in NSF grantee programs. The group proposed that the NSF require its grantee institutions to submit annually and for public display (1) their most recent affirmative action plans, including equal employment opportunity information and utilization reports; and (2) indication of specific collaborations with nonresearch institutions in NSF programs. Deliberations and recommendations of the working group are presented in this article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70649100494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70649100494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i3.40
DO - 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i3.40
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70649100494
SN - 1072-8325
VL - 15
SP - 245
EP - 261
JO - Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
JF - Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
IS - 3
ER -