Methods for Identifying Translational Researchers

Mary Feeney, Timothy Johnson, Eric Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is currently no generally accepted method for identifying the community of translational researchers when evaluating Clinical and Translational Science Centers. We use data from the multiyear evaluation of the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) to investigate the complexities of reliably identifying translational researchers. We use three methods to identify translational researchers: (1) participating in CCTS services and programs; (2) self-identifying as a translational researcher; and (3) engaging in activities that are characteristic of translational science. We find little overlap of these differently defined research groups. We conclude with a discussion of how the findings suggest challenges for evaluating translational science programs and the need for better definition, communication, and demonstration of translational science for scientists and evaluators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-18
Number of pages16
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Research

Keywords

  • CTSA
  • evaluation
  • NIH
  • surveys
  • translational

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Methods for Identifying Translational Researchers. / Feeney, Mary; Johnson, Timothy; Welch, Eric.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2014, p. 3-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4df2e07e313640c49db933a5435af94d,
title = "Methods for Identifying Translational Researchers",
abstract = "There is currently no generally accepted method for identifying the community of translational researchers when evaluating Clinical and Translational Science Centers. We use data from the multiyear evaluation of the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) to investigate the complexities of reliably identifying translational researchers. We use three methods to identify translational researchers: (1) participating in CCTS services and programs; (2) self-identifying as a translational researcher; and (3) engaging in activities that are characteristic of translational science. We find little overlap of these differently defined research groups. We conclude with a discussion of how the findings suggest challenges for evaluating translational science programs and the need for better definition, communication, and demonstration of translational science for scientists and evaluators.",
keywords = "CTSA, evaluation, NIH, surveys, translational",
author = "Mary Feeney and Timothy Johnson and Eric Welch",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0163278713504583",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "3--18",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods for Identifying Translational Researchers

AU - Feeney, Mary

AU - Johnson, Timothy

AU - Welch, Eric

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - There is currently no generally accepted method for identifying the community of translational researchers when evaluating Clinical and Translational Science Centers. We use data from the multiyear evaluation of the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) to investigate the complexities of reliably identifying translational researchers. We use three methods to identify translational researchers: (1) participating in CCTS services and programs; (2) self-identifying as a translational researcher; and (3) engaging in activities that are characteristic of translational science. We find little overlap of these differently defined research groups. We conclude with a discussion of how the findings suggest challenges for evaluating translational science programs and the need for better definition, communication, and demonstration of translational science for scientists and evaluators.

AB - There is currently no generally accepted method for identifying the community of translational researchers when evaluating Clinical and Translational Science Centers. We use data from the multiyear evaluation of the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) to investigate the complexities of reliably identifying translational researchers. We use three methods to identify translational researchers: (1) participating in CCTS services and programs; (2) self-identifying as a translational researcher; and (3) engaging in activities that are characteristic of translational science. We find little overlap of these differently defined research groups. We conclude with a discussion of how the findings suggest challenges for evaluating translational science programs and the need for better definition, communication, and demonstration of translational science for scientists and evaluators.

KW - CTSA

KW - evaluation

KW - NIH

KW - surveys

KW - translational

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893592653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893592653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0163278713504583

DO - 10.1177/0163278713504583

M3 - Article

C2 - 24064431

AN - SCOPUS:84893592653

VL - 37

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 1

ER -