Methodology brut: Philosophy, Ecstatic Thinking, and Some Other (Unfinished) Things

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A reminder: This text has been created as a series of brut and raw responses representing a collective of “impossible” imaginings. Our collective writing is not about the vision or about insights into the future of qualitative inquiry per se, but it is about ways in which some qualitative researchers wish to stay methodologically and theoretically in flux and motion. We desire to face this uncertainty, rawness, and creative chaos by engaging in collective thinking without constant and continuous purification and “cleaning” efforts. The future of qualitative inquiry is not one but multiple; thus, there cannot be one “vision” but all visions; visions on top of other visions, visions continuing other visions, visions contradicting others, visions lacking and desiring something that cannot be described, understood, or had.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)612-619
Number of pages8
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

methodology
chaos
uncertainty
philosophy

Keywords

  • brut
  • collective writing
  • experimentation
  • methodology
  • multiplicities
  • qualitative inquiry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Methodology brut : Philosophy, Ecstatic Thinking, and Some Other (Unfinished) Things. / Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Carlson, David; Tesar, Marek; Anderson, Katherine.

In: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 21, No. 7, 01.10.2015, p. 612-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff3563cbe6b643e380ff2e78c9891f21,
title = "Methodology brut: Philosophy, Ecstatic Thinking, and Some Other (Unfinished) Things",
abstract = "A reminder: This text has been created as a series of brut and raw responses representing a collective of “impossible” imaginings. Our collective writing is not about the vision or about insights into the future of qualitative inquiry per se, but it is about ways in which some qualitative researchers wish to stay methodologically and theoretically in flux and motion. We desire to face this uncertainty, rawness, and creative chaos by engaging in collective thinking without constant and continuous purification and “cleaning” efforts. The future of qualitative inquiry is not one but multiple; thus, there cannot be one “vision” but all visions; visions on top of other visions, visions continuing other visions, visions contradicting others, visions lacking and desiring something that cannot be described, understood, or had.",
keywords = "brut, collective writing, experimentation, methodology, multiplicities, qualitative inquiry",
author = "Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and David Carlson and Marek Tesar and Katherine Anderson",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077800414555070",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "612--619",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodology brut

T2 - Philosophy, Ecstatic Thinking, and Some Other (Unfinished) Things

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Carlson, David

AU - Tesar, Marek

AU - Anderson, Katherine

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - A reminder: This text has been created as a series of brut and raw responses representing a collective of “impossible” imaginings. Our collective writing is not about the vision or about insights into the future of qualitative inquiry per se, but it is about ways in which some qualitative researchers wish to stay methodologically and theoretically in flux and motion. We desire to face this uncertainty, rawness, and creative chaos by engaging in collective thinking without constant and continuous purification and “cleaning” efforts. The future of qualitative inquiry is not one but multiple; thus, there cannot be one “vision” but all visions; visions on top of other visions, visions continuing other visions, visions contradicting others, visions lacking and desiring something that cannot be described, understood, or had.

AB - A reminder: This text has been created as a series of brut and raw responses representing a collective of “impossible” imaginings. Our collective writing is not about the vision or about insights into the future of qualitative inquiry per se, but it is about ways in which some qualitative researchers wish to stay methodologically and theoretically in flux and motion. We desire to face this uncertainty, rawness, and creative chaos by engaging in collective thinking without constant and continuous purification and “cleaning” efforts. The future of qualitative inquiry is not one but multiple; thus, there cannot be one “vision” but all visions; visions on top of other visions, visions continuing other visions, visions contradicting others, visions lacking and desiring something that cannot be described, understood, or had.

KW - brut

KW - collective writing

KW - experimentation

KW - methodology

KW - multiplicities

KW - qualitative inquiry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938320861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938320861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077800414555070

DO - 10.1177/1077800414555070

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 612

EP - 619

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

IS - 7

ER -