Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements

Kathleen Talbot, Matt R. Nobles, Bonnie S. Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stalking is defined in a variety of ways within state statutes and social science and, therefore, researchers have not standardized how to define or operationalize this phenomenon. These disparate definitions and approaches to measurement have important implications for the validity, reliability, and generalizability of knowledge about stalking victimization and perpetration across different contexts. The purpose of this article is to identify patterns in defining and measuring stalking and to advance the field by offering recommendations for measuring stalking more consistently in the future. Methodological procedures of 56 peer-reviewed published stalking studies are examined and implications for future stalking measurement are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-84
Number of pages11
JournalAggression and Violent Behavior
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stalking
Crime Victims
Social Sciences
Reproducibility of Results
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Behaviorally specific
  • Measurement
  • Methodology
  • Perpetration
  • Stalking
  • Victimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Method behind the madness : An examination of stalking measurements. / Talbot, Kathleen; Nobles, Matt R.; Fisher, Bonnie S.

In: Aggression and Violent Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 74-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Talbot, Kathleen ; Nobles, Matt R. ; Fisher, Bonnie S. / Method behind the madness : An examination of stalking measurements. In: Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2011 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 74-84.
@article{5dcb3cf3a2cc4d5f840c01689129c15f,
title = "Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements",
abstract = "Stalking is defined in a variety of ways within state statutes and social science and, therefore, researchers have not standardized how to define or operationalize this phenomenon. These disparate definitions and approaches to measurement have important implications for the validity, reliability, and generalizability of knowledge about stalking victimization and perpetration across different contexts. The purpose of this article is to identify patterns in defining and measuring stalking and to advance the field by offering recommendations for measuring stalking more consistently in the future. Methodological procedures of 56 peer-reviewed published stalking studies are examined and implications for future stalking measurement are discussed.",
keywords = "Behaviorally specific, Measurement, Methodology, Perpetration, Stalking, Victimization",
author = "Kathleen Talbot and Nobles, {Matt R.} and Fisher, {Bonnie S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "74--84",
journal = "Aggression and Violent Behavior",
issn = "1359-1789",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Method behind the madness

T2 - An examination of stalking measurements

AU - Talbot, Kathleen

AU - Nobles, Matt R.

AU - Fisher, Bonnie S.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Stalking is defined in a variety of ways within state statutes and social science and, therefore, researchers have not standardized how to define or operationalize this phenomenon. These disparate definitions and approaches to measurement have important implications for the validity, reliability, and generalizability of knowledge about stalking victimization and perpetration across different contexts. The purpose of this article is to identify patterns in defining and measuring stalking and to advance the field by offering recommendations for measuring stalking more consistently in the future. Methodological procedures of 56 peer-reviewed published stalking studies are examined and implications for future stalking measurement are discussed.

AB - Stalking is defined in a variety of ways within state statutes and social science and, therefore, researchers have not standardized how to define or operationalize this phenomenon. These disparate definitions and approaches to measurement have important implications for the validity, reliability, and generalizability of knowledge about stalking victimization and perpetration across different contexts. The purpose of this article is to identify patterns in defining and measuring stalking and to advance the field by offering recommendations for measuring stalking more consistently in the future. Methodological procedures of 56 peer-reviewed published stalking studies are examined and implications for future stalking measurement are discussed.

KW - Behaviorally specific

KW - Measurement

KW - Methodology

KW - Perpetration

KW - Stalking

KW - Victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951681716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951681716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79951681716

VL - 16

SP - 74

EP - 84

JO - Aggression and Violent Behavior

JF - Aggression and Violent Behavior

SN - 1359-1789

IS - 1

ER -