Meta-analysis of 301 slope failure calculations. I: database description

Quentin B. Travis, Mark Schmeeckle, David M. Sebert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the early part of the twentieth century, two-dimensional limit equilibrium (2DLE) analysis has been the scientific community's primary means of slope stability calculation. However, it is well established that the input parameters to 2DLE, namely, soil strength and anisotropy, slope geometry, pore water pressures, failure surface geometry, applicable correction factors, and loading conditions are all inherently uncertain. Effective modeling must account for these uncertainties statistically. Unfortunately, most of the key statistical parameters, such as the safety factor statistical distribution and standard deviation (sd), are unknown and must be estimated by the analyst. In response to this growing need for statistical information, a database was established from the literature of 157 different failed slopes and the corresponding published 301 safety factor (SF) calculations. The database, which covered more than five decades of slope stability research, also included a number of the slope stability factors, including analytical method used, stress approach (effective versus total), assumed slip surface geometry, slope type, applied correction factors, and soil Atterberg limits. A temporal analysis found no evidence that SF prediction or deviation had significantly changed. A log (base 10) normal distribution was found to adequately describe the SF data, with a (nontransformed) mean of 1.03 and a (transformed) sd of 0.087, but the pronounced curvature of the residuals indicated significant, unresolved slope factors, further investigated in the companion paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)453-470
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume137
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 10 2011

Fingerprint

Safety factor
meta-analysis
slope failure
Slope stability
slope stability
safety
geometry
Geometry
Atterberg limit
Soils
temporal analysis
statistical distribution
soil strength
Normal distribution
twentieth century
curvature
analytical method
porewater
Anisotropy
anisotropy

Keywords

  • Dam failures
  • Data analysis
  • Data collection
  • Embankment stability
  • Landslides
  • Limit equilibrium
  • Risk management
  • Slope stability
  • Slopes
  • Stability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Meta-analysis of 301 slope failure calculations. I : database description. / Travis, Quentin B.; Schmeeckle, Mark; Sebert, David M.

In: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 5, 10.05.2011, p. 453-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f20a25845084ce3a89359f8a60e75ff,
title = "Meta-analysis of 301 slope failure calculations. I: database description",
abstract = "Since the early part of the twentieth century, two-dimensional limit equilibrium (2DLE) analysis has been the scientific community's primary means of slope stability calculation. However, it is well established that the input parameters to 2DLE, namely, soil strength and anisotropy, slope geometry, pore water pressures, failure surface geometry, applicable correction factors, and loading conditions are all inherently uncertain. Effective modeling must account for these uncertainties statistically. Unfortunately, most of the key statistical parameters, such as the safety factor statistical distribution and standard deviation (sd), are unknown and must be estimated by the analyst. In response to this growing need for statistical information, a database was established from the literature of 157 different failed slopes and the corresponding published 301 safety factor (SF) calculations. The database, which covered more than five decades of slope stability research, also included a number of the slope stability factors, including analytical method used, stress approach (effective versus total), assumed slip surface geometry, slope type, applied correction factors, and soil Atterberg limits. A temporal analysis found no evidence that SF prediction or deviation had significantly changed. A log (base 10) normal distribution was found to adequately describe the SF data, with a (nontransformed) mean of 1.03 and a (transformed) sd of 0.087, but the pronounced curvature of the residuals indicated significant, unresolved slope factors, further investigated in the companion paper.",
keywords = "Dam failures, Data analysis, Data collection, Embankment stability, Landslides, Limit equilibrium, Risk management, Slope stability, Slopes, Stability",
author = "Travis, {Quentin B.} and Mark Schmeeckle and Sebert, {David M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000461",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "453--470",
journal = "Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "1090-0241",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis of 301 slope failure calculations. I

T2 - database description

AU - Travis, Quentin B.

AU - Schmeeckle, Mark

AU - Sebert, David M.

PY - 2011/5/10

Y1 - 2011/5/10

N2 - Since the early part of the twentieth century, two-dimensional limit equilibrium (2DLE) analysis has been the scientific community's primary means of slope stability calculation. However, it is well established that the input parameters to 2DLE, namely, soil strength and anisotropy, slope geometry, pore water pressures, failure surface geometry, applicable correction factors, and loading conditions are all inherently uncertain. Effective modeling must account for these uncertainties statistically. Unfortunately, most of the key statistical parameters, such as the safety factor statistical distribution and standard deviation (sd), are unknown and must be estimated by the analyst. In response to this growing need for statistical information, a database was established from the literature of 157 different failed slopes and the corresponding published 301 safety factor (SF) calculations. The database, which covered more than five decades of slope stability research, also included a number of the slope stability factors, including analytical method used, stress approach (effective versus total), assumed slip surface geometry, slope type, applied correction factors, and soil Atterberg limits. A temporal analysis found no evidence that SF prediction or deviation had significantly changed. A log (base 10) normal distribution was found to adequately describe the SF data, with a (nontransformed) mean of 1.03 and a (transformed) sd of 0.087, but the pronounced curvature of the residuals indicated significant, unresolved slope factors, further investigated in the companion paper.

AB - Since the early part of the twentieth century, two-dimensional limit equilibrium (2DLE) analysis has been the scientific community's primary means of slope stability calculation. However, it is well established that the input parameters to 2DLE, namely, soil strength and anisotropy, slope geometry, pore water pressures, failure surface geometry, applicable correction factors, and loading conditions are all inherently uncertain. Effective modeling must account for these uncertainties statistically. Unfortunately, most of the key statistical parameters, such as the safety factor statistical distribution and standard deviation (sd), are unknown and must be estimated by the analyst. In response to this growing need for statistical information, a database was established from the literature of 157 different failed slopes and the corresponding published 301 safety factor (SF) calculations. The database, which covered more than five decades of slope stability research, also included a number of the slope stability factors, including analytical method used, stress approach (effective versus total), assumed slip surface geometry, slope type, applied correction factors, and soil Atterberg limits. A temporal analysis found no evidence that SF prediction or deviation had significantly changed. A log (base 10) normal distribution was found to adequately describe the SF data, with a (nontransformed) mean of 1.03 and a (transformed) sd of 0.087, but the pronounced curvature of the residuals indicated significant, unresolved slope factors, further investigated in the companion paper.

KW - Dam failures

KW - Data analysis

KW - Data collection

KW - Embankment stability

KW - Landslides

KW - Limit equilibrium

KW - Risk management

KW - Slope stability

KW - Slopes

KW - Stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955786970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955786970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000461

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000461

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955786970

VL - 137

SP - 453

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

SN - 1090-0241

IS - 5

ER -