Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry

Nancy Grimm, Sarah E. Gergel, William H. McDowell, Elizabeth W. Boyer, C. Lisa Dent, Peter Groffman, Stephen C. Hart, Judson Harvey, Carol Johnston, Emilio Mayorga, Michael E. McClain, Gilles Pinay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although biogeochemistry is an integrative discipline, terrestrial and aquatic subdisciplines have developed somewhat independently of each other. Physical and biological differences between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems explain this history. In both aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry, key questions and concepts arise from a focus on nutrient limitation, ecosystem nutrient retention, and controls of nutrient transformations. Current understanding is captured in conceptual models for different ecosystem types, which share some features and diverge in other ways. Distinctiveness of subdisciplines has been appropriate in some respects and has fostered important advances in theory. On the other hand, lack of integration between aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry limits our ability to deal with biogeochemical phenomena across large landscapes in which connections between terrestrial and aquatic elements are important. Separation of the two approaches also has not served attempts to scale up or to estimate fluxes from large areas based on plot measurements. Understanding connectivity between the two system types and scaling up biogeochemical information will rely on coupled hydrologic and ecological models, and may be critical for addressing environmental problems associated with locally, regionally, and globally altered biogeochemical cycles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)485-501
Number of pages17
JournalOecologia
Volume137
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

biogeochemistry
nutrient
nutrients
nutrient retention
ecosystems
nutrient limitation
biogeochemical cycle
terrestrial ecosystem
aquatic ecosystem
biogeochemical cycles
connectivity
history
ecosystem

Keywords

  • Ecosystem comparison
  • Linkages
  • Nutrient cycling
  • Nutrient limitation
  • Nutrient retention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Grimm, N., Gergel, S. E., McDowell, W. H., Boyer, E. W., Dent, C. L., Groffman, P., ... Pinay, G. (2003). Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry. Oecologia, 137(4), 485-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1382-5

Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry. / Grimm, Nancy; Gergel, Sarah E.; McDowell, William H.; Boyer, Elizabeth W.; Dent, C. Lisa; Groffman, Peter; Hart, Stephen C.; Harvey, Judson; Johnston, Carol; Mayorga, Emilio; McClain, Michael E.; Pinay, Gilles.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 137, No. 4, 12.2003, p. 485-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grimm, N, Gergel, SE, McDowell, WH, Boyer, EW, Dent, CL, Groffman, P, Hart, SC, Harvey, J, Johnston, C, Mayorga, E, McClain, ME & Pinay, G 2003, 'Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry', Oecologia, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 485-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1382-5
Grimm N, Gergel SE, McDowell WH, Boyer EW, Dent CL, Groffman P et al. Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry. Oecologia. 2003 Dec;137(4):485-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1382-5
Grimm, Nancy ; Gergel, Sarah E. ; McDowell, William H. ; Boyer, Elizabeth W. ; Dent, C. Lisa ; Groffman, Peter ; Hart, Stephen C. ; Harvey, Judson ; Johnston, Carol ; Mayorga, Emilio ; McClain, Michael E. ; Pinay, Gilles. / Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry. In: Oecologia. 2003 ; Vol. 137, No. 4. pp. 485-501.
@article{a8c471ff7d74420e85e8ead422d73e30,
title = "Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry",
abstract = "Although biogeochemistry is an integrative discipline, terrestrial and aquatic subdisciplines have developed somewhat independently of each other. Physical and biological differences between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems explain this history. In both aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry, key questions and concepts arise from a focus on nutrient limitation, ecosystem nutrient retention, and controls of nutrient transformations. Current understanding is captured in conceptual models for different ecosystem types, which share some features and diverge in other ways. Distinctiveness of subdisciplines has been appropriate in some respects and has fostered important advances in theory. On the other hand, lack of integration between aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry limits our ability to deal with biogeochemical phenomena across large landscapes in which connections between terrestrial and aquatic elements are important. Separation of the two approaches also has not served attempts to scale up or to estimate fluxes from large areas based on plot measurements. Understanding connectivity between the two system types and scaling up biogeochemical information will rely on coupled hydrologic and ecological models, and may be critical for addressing environmental problems associated with locally, regionally, and globally altered biogeochemical cycles.",
keywords = "Ecosystem comparison, Linkages, Nutrient cycling, Nutrient limitation, Nutrient retention",
author = "Nancy Grimm and Gergel, {Sarah E.} and McDowell, {William H.} and Boyer, {Elizabeth W.} and Dent, {C. Lisa} and Peter Groffman and Hart, {Stephen C.} and Judson Harvey and Carol Johnston and Emilio Mayorga and McClain, {Michael E.} and Gilles Pinay",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00442-003-1382-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "485--501",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8519",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry

AU - Grimm, Nancy

AU - Gergel, Sarah E.

AU - McDowell, William H.

AU - Boyer, Elizabeth W.

AU - Dent, C. Lisa

AU - Groffman, Peter

AU - Hart, Stephen C.

AU - Harvey, Judson

AU - Johnston, Carol

AU - Mayorga, Emilio

AU - McClain, Michael E.

AU - Pinay, Gilles

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Although biogeochemistry is an integrative discipline, terrestrial and aquatic subdisciplines have developed somewhat independently of each other. Physical and biological differences between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems explain this history. In both aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry, key questions and concepts arise from a focus on nutrient limitation, ecosystem nutrient retention, and controls of nutrient transformations. Current understanding is captured in conceptual models for different ecosystem types, which share some features and diverge in other ways. Distinctiveness of subdisciplines has been appropriate in some respects and has fostered important advances in theory. On the other hand, lack of integration between aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry limits our ability to deal with biogeochemical phenomena across large landscapes in which connections between terrestrial and aquatic elements are important. Separation of the two approaches also has not served attempts to scale up or to estimate fluxes from large areas based on plot measurements. Understanding connectivity between the two system types and scaling up biogeochemical information will rely on coupled hydrologic and ecological models, and may be critical for addressing environmental problems associated with locally, regionally, and globally altered biogeochemical cycles.

AB - Although biogeochemistry is an integrative discipline, terrestrial and aquatic subdisciplines have developed somewhat independently of each other. Physical and biological differences between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems explain this history. In both aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry, key questions and concepts arise from a focus on nutrient limitation, ecosystem nutrient retention, and controls of nutrient transformations. Current understanding is captured in conceptual models for different ecosystem types, which share some features and diverge in other ways. Distinctiveness of subdisciplines has been appropriate in some respects and has fostered important advances in theory. On the other hand, lack of integration between aquatic and terrestrial biogeochemistry limits our ability to deal with biogeochemical phenomena across large landscapes in which connections between terrestrial and aquatic elements are important. Separation of the two approaches also has not served attempts to scale up or to estimate fluxes from large areas based on plot measurements. Understanding connectivity between the two system types and scaling up biogeochemical information will rely on coupled hydrologic and ecological models, and may be critical for addressing environmental problems associated with locally, regionally, and globally altered biogeochemical cycles.

KW - Ecosystem comparison

KW - Linkages

KW - Nutrient cycling

KW - Nutrient limitation

KW - Nutrient retention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10744230700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10744230700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00442-003-1382-5

DO - 10.1007/s00442-003-1382-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 14505024

AN - SCOPUS:10744230700

VL - 137

SP - 485

EP - 501

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8519

IS - 4

ER -