Mentoring and network ties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using questionnaire data obtained from a sample of state government managers, our study examines social capital foci (network ties) of mentoring relations. Others have shown that network ties are relevant to career development and advance. We begin with the assumption that enhanced network ties are generally beneficial. We investigate variation in mentorships, which enhance network ties within the focal organization and within organizations external to the focal organization. We examine a number of factors hypothesized as shaping the relationship between mentoring and the development of network ties, including attributes of the protégé and of the mentoring relationship. Our results show that the sex of the protégé and of the mentor does not affect the quantity of network ties conveyed. However, relationships in which protégé and mentor sex is matched provide more network ties. Counter to our expectations, there is no significant difference in the amount and focus of network ties accruing from formal, organizationally sanctioned mentoring and informal mentoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1651-1676
Number of pages26
JournalHuman Relations
Volume61
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

mentoring
Managers
organization
Mentoring
social capital
career
manager
questionnaire

Keywords

  • Careers
  • Formal mentor
  • Informal mentor
  • Mentoring
  • Personnel selection
  • Public management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Mentoring and network ties. / Feeney, Mary; Bozeman, Barry.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 61, No. 12, 12.2008, p. 1651-1676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feeney, Mary ; Bozeman, Barry. / Mentoring and network ties. In: Human Relations. 2008 ; Vol. 61, No. 12. pp. 1651-1676.
@article{123cccf1e253479d90762bd1e14ee125,
title = "Mentoring and network ties",
abstract = "Using questionnaire data obtained from a sample of state government managers, our study examines social capital foci (network ties) of mentoring relations. Others have shown that network ties are relevant to career development and advance. We begin with the assumption that enhanced network ties are generally beneficial. We investigate variation in mentorships, which enhance network ties within the focal organization and within organizations external to the focal organization. We examine a number of factors hypothesized as shaping the relationship between mentoring and the development of network ties, including attributes of the prot{\'e}g{\'e} and of the mentoring relationship. Our results show that the sex of the prot{\'e}g{\'e} and of the mentor does not affect the quantity of network ties conveyed. However, relationships in which prot{\'e}g{\'e} and mentor sex is matched provide more network ties. Counter to our expectations, there is no significant difference in the amount and focus of network ties accruing from formal, organizationally sanctioned mentoring and informal mentoring.",
keywords = "Careers, Formal mentor, Informal mentor, Mentoring, Personnel selection, Public management",
author = "Mary Feeney and Barry Bozeman",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0018726708098081",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1651--1676",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentoring and network ties

AU - Feeney, Mary

AU - Bozeman, Barry

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Using questionnaire data obtained from a sample of state government managers, our study examines social capital foci (network ties) of mentoring relations. Others have shown that network ties are relevant to career development and advance. We begin with the assumption that enhanced network ties are generally beneficial. We investigate variation in mentorships, which enhance network ties within the focal organization and within organizations external to the focal organization. We examine a number of factors hypothesized as shaping the relationship between mentoring and the development of network ties, including attributes of the protégé and of the mentoring relationship. Our results show that the sex of the protégé and of the mentor does not affect the quantity of network ties conveyed. However, relationships in which protégé and mentor sex is matched provide more network ties. Counter to our expectations, there is no significant difference in the amount and focus of network ties accruing from formal, organizationally sanctioned mentoring and informal mentoring.

AB - Using questionnaire data obtained from a sample of state government managers, our study examines social capital foci (network ties) of mentoring relations. Others have shown that network ties are relevant to career development and advance. We begin with the assumption that enhanced network ties are generally beneficial. We investigate variation in mentorships, which enhance network ties within the focal organization and within organizations external to the focal organization. We examine a number of factors hypothesized as shaping the relationship between mentoring and the development of network ties, including attributes of the protégé and of the mentoring relationship. Our results show that the sex of the protégé and of the mentor does not affect the quantity of network ties conveyed. However, relationships in which protégé and mentor sex is matched provide more network ties. Counter to our expectations, there is no significant difference in the amount and focus of network ties accruing from formal, organizationally sanctioned mentoring and informal mentoring.

KW - Careers

KW - Formal mentor

KW - Informal mentor

KW - Mentoring

KW - Personnel selection

KW - Public management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57849116586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57849116586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018726708098081

DO - 10.1177/0018726708098081

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57849116586

VL - 61

SP - 1651

EP - 1676

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 12

ER -