Abstract
Accurate biological information about menstruation is crucial for menstrual health literacy. A diverse group of students (N = 125) at a large southwestern US university estimated—by pouring liquid into containers—the amount of menstrual blood produced during an average menstrual period. Only 14% could give a relatively accurate estimate, whereas 55% overestimated by at least 65 ml. Further, 7% gave extreme overestimations of one liter or more. Gender and race did not impact accurate knowledge, but queer/pansexual participants and women’s and gender studies or social justice majors were significantly more accurate. Implications for health education and recognizing heavy bleeding are explored.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 115-136 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Women's Reproductive Health |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- Menstrual health
- health literacy
- menstrual knowledge: menstrual education
- menstruation
- women’s bodies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternity and Midwifery
- Reproductive Medicine