Menstrual Knowledge and Understandings of Normal and Extreme Bleeding: College Students’ Overestimation of the Typical Amount of Menstrual Blood

Breanne Fahs, Eric Swank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Accurate biological information about menstruation is crucial for menstrual health literacy. A diverse group of students (N = 125) at a large southwestern US university estimated—by pouring liquid into containers—the amount of menstrual blood produced during an average menstrual period. Only 14% could give a relatively accurate estimate, whereas 55% overestimated by at least 65 ml. Further, 7% gave extreme overestimations of one liter or more. Gender and race did not impact accurate knowledge, but queer/pansexual participants and women’s and gender studies or social justice majors were significantly more accurate. Implications for health education and recognizing heavy bleeding are explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-136
Number of pages22
JournalWomen's Reproductive Health
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Menstrual health
  • health literacy
  • menstrual knowledge: menstrual education
  • menstruation
  • women’s bodies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternity and Midwifery
  • Reproductive Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Menstrual Knowledge and Understandings of Normal and Extreme Bleeding: College Students’ Overestimation of the Typical Amount of Menstrual Blood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this