Memory Deficits and Memory Surfeits. Differential Cognitive Consequences of Tokenism for Tokens and Observers

Charles G. Lord, Delia Saenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historically, women and minority group members have been underrepresented in the professions and in better paying, high-status jobs. Even when they have been admitted to such positions, these underrepresented persons often have been the only member of their social category: a token. Previous field and laboratory research has shown that "tokens" attract disproportionate attention and are either evaluated unfairly or evaluated on the basis of their normal reactions to differential treatment by majority group members. We tested the possibilities of whether tokens might suffer more cognitive deficits than would nontokens, and whether they do so even when they are treated no differently. College students were led to believe that they were sharing their views on everday topics with three other students (actually videotaped confederates), who were either all of the student's own sex or all of the opposite sex. In a later memory test, token participants remembered fewer of the opinions that they and the three other students had expressed than did nontokens. Observers, in contrast, remembered more of what token subjects said than what the three other students said. Theoretical and public policy implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)918-926
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Memory Disorders
deficit
Students
group membership
student
Minority Groups
Public Policy
public policy
profession
minority
human being
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Memory Deficits and Memory Surfeits. Differential Cognitive Consequences of Tokenism for Tokens and Observers. / Lord, Charles G.; Saenz, Delia.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 4, 10.1985, p. 918-926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c28ee5b11f44828bf194a41bf4bea46,
title = "Memory Deficits and Memory Surfeits. Differential Cognitive Consequences of Tokenism for Tokens and Observers",
abstract = "Historically, women and minority group members have been underrepresented in the professions and in better paying, high-status jobs. Even when they have been admitted to such positions, these underrepresented persons often have been the only member of their social category: a token. Previous field and laboratory research has shown that {"}tokens{"} attract disproportionate attention and are either evaluated unfairly or evaluated on the basis of their normal reactions to differential treatment by majority group members. We tested the possibilities of whether tokens might suffer more cognitive deficits than would nontokens, and whether they do so even when they are treated no differently. College students were led to believe that they were sharing their views on everday topics with three other students (actually videotaped confederates), who were either all of the student's own sex or all of the opposite sex. In a later memory test, token participants remembered fewer of the opinions that they and the three other students had expressed than did nontokens. Observers, in contrast, remembered more of what token subjects said than what the three other students said. Theoretical and public policy implications are discussed.",
author = "Lord, {Charles G.} and Delia Saenz",
year = "1985",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.918",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "918--926",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory Deficits and Memory Surfeits. Differential Cognitive Consequences of Tokenism for Tokens and Observers

AU - Lord, Charles G.

AU - Saenz, Delia

PY - 1985/10

Y1 - 1985/10

N2 - Historically, women and minority group members have been underrepresented in the professions and in better paying, high-status jobs. Even when they have been admitted to such positions, these underrepresented persons often have been the only member of their social category: a token. Previous field and laboratory research has shown that "tokens" attract disproportionate attention and are either evaluated unfairly or evaluated on the basis of their normal reactions to differential treatment by majority group members. We tested the possibilities of whether tokens might suffer more cognitive deficits than would nontokens, and whether they do so even when they are treated no differently. College students were led to believe that they were sharing their views on everday topics with three other students (actually videotaped confederates), who were either all of the student's own sex or all of the opposite sex. In a later memory test, token participants remembered fewer of the opinions that they and the three other students had expressed than did nontokens. Observers, in contrast, remembered more of what token subjects said than what the three other students said. Theoretical and public policy implications are discussed.

AB - Historically, women and minority group members have been underrepresented in the professions and in better paying, high-status jobs. Even when they have been admitted to such positions, these underrepresented persons often have been the only member of their social category: a token. Previous field and laboratory research has shown that "tokens" attract disproportionate attention and are either evaluated unfairly or evaluated on the basis of their normal reactions to differential treatment by majority group members. We tested the possibilities of whether tokens might suffer more cognitive deficits than would nontokens, and whether they do so even when they are treated no differently. College students were led to believe that they were sharing their views on everday topics with three other students (actually videotaped confederates), who were either all of the student's own sex or all of the opposite sex. In a later memory test, token participants remembered fewer of the opinions that they and the three other students had expressed than did nontokens. Observers, in contrast, remembered more of what token subjects said than what the three other students said. Theoretical and public policy implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022137709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022137709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.918

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.918

M3 - Article

C2 - 4057050

AN - SCOPUS:0022137709

VL - 49

SP - 918

EP - 926

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 4

ER -