Memes: Universal acid or a better mousetrap?

Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that memeticists have been far too fascinated with one of Darwin's conceptual advances: the identification of natural selection as the mechanism for cumulative adaptation. It also argues that population thinking is the key to conceptualizing culture in terms of material causes, and can play an important, constructive role in the human sciences. It is thought that Darwinian models of culture are useful for two reasons. First, they serve to connect the rich models of behavior based on individual action developed in economics, psychology, and evolutionary biology with the data and insights of the cultural sciences, anthropology, archaeology, and sociology. Second, population thinking is useful because it offers a way to build a mathematical theory of human behavior that captures the important role of culture in human affairs. The problem of human cooperation should be considered in order to know how useful populationbased models can be. It is stated that memes are not a universal acid, but population thinking is a better mousetrap.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDarwinizing Culture
Subtitle of host publicationThe Status of Memetics as a Science
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191670473
ISBN (Print)9780192632449
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 22 2012
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Darwinian models
  • Memes
  • Mousetrap
  • Population thinking
  • Universal acid

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2012). Memes: Universal acid or a better mousetrap? In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192632449.003.0007