Meeting the need or falling in line? The effect of laissez-faire formal leaders on informal leadership

Edward Wellman, Daniel W. Newton, Danni Wang, Wu Wei, David Waldman, Jeffery LePine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We consider the utility of two contrasting theoretical perspectives in explaining how laissez-faire formal leaders and team member motivation to lead (MTL) influences informal leadership and team task performance. The first perspective, functional leadership theory, is the dominant lens used currently to understand informal leadership. However, we suggest that social learning theory offers a compelling alternative account. In a multiwave survey study of 344 members of 72 work teams, we find support for the social learning theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are perceived by team members to engage in less modeling of effective leadership and as a result are negatively associated with informal leadership and team task performance. We do not find support for the functional leadership theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are positively associated with team members’ informal leadership and team task performance, which would be due to an increased perceived need for leadership. The social learning effects are stronger for teams that are lower in member MTL and weaker for teams that are higher in member MTL. These results suggest social learning theory may be preferable to functional leadership theory for understanding informal leadership in teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPersonnel Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Task Performance and Analysis
Motivation
Laissez-faire
Lenses
Social learning
Social Learning
Learning theory
Leadership theory
Task performance
Social Theory
Prediction

Keywords

  • leadership
  • motivation/self-regulation
  • teams/group processes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Meeting the need or falling in line? The effect of laissez-faire formal leaders on informal leadership. / Wellman, Edward; Newton, Daniel W.; Wang, Danni; Wei, Wu; Waldman, David; LePine, Jeffery.

In: Personnel Psychology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5e21572b8ab4e1fa48a37f03fa1a291,
title = "Meeting the need or falling in line? The effect of laissez-faire formal leaders on informal leadership",
abstract = "We consider the utility of two contrasting theoretical perspectives in explaining how laissez-faire formal leaders and team member motivation to lead (MTL) influences informal leadership and team task performance. The first perspective, functional leadership theory, is the dominant lens used currently to understand informal leadership. However, we suggest that social learning theory offers a compelling alternative account. In a multiwave survey study of 344 members of 72 work teams, we find support for the social learning theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are perceived by team members to engage in less modeling of effective leadership and as a result are negatively associated with informal leadership and team task performance. We do not find support for the functional leadership theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are positively associated with team members’ informal leadership and team task performance, which would be due to an increased perceived need for leadership. The social learning effects are stronger for teams that are lower in member MTL and weaker for teams that are higher in member MTL. These results suggest social learning theory may be preferable to functional leadership theory for understanding informal leadership in teams.",
keywords = "leadership, motivation/self-regulation, teams/group processes",
author = "Edward Wellman and Newton, {Daniel W.} and Danni Wang and Wu Wei and David Waldman and Jeffery LePine",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/peps.12308",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Personnel Psychology",
issn = "0031-5826",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meeting the need or falling in line? The effect of laissez-faire formal leaders on informal leadership

AU - Wellman, Edward

AU - Newton, Daniel W.

AU - Wang, Danni

AU - Wei, Wu

AU - Waldman, David

AU - LePine, Jeffery

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - We consider the utility of two contrasting theoretical perspectives in explaining how laissez-faire formal leaders and team member motivation to lead (MTL) influences informal leadership and team task performance. The first perspective, functional leadership theory, is the dominant lens used currently to understand informal leadership. However, we suggest that social learning theory offers a compelling alternative account. In a multiwave survey study of 344 members of 72 work teams, we find support for the social learning theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are perceived by team members to engage in less modeling of effective leadership and as a result are negatively associated with informal leadership and team task performance. We do not find support for the functional leadership theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are positively associated with team members’ informal leadership and team task performance, which would be due to an increased perceived need for leadership. The social learning effects are stronger for teams that are lower in member MTL and weaker for teams that are higher in member MTL. These results suggest social learning theory may be preferable to functional leadership theory for understanding informal leadership in teams.

AB - We consider the utility of two contrasting theoretical perspectives in explaining how laissez-faire formal leaders and team member motivation to lead (MTL) influences informal leadership and team task performance. The first perspective, functional leadership theory, is the dominant lens used currently to understand informal leadership. However, we suggest that social learning theory offers a compelling alternative account. In a multiwave survey study of 344 members of 72 work teams, we find support for the social learning theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are perceived by team members to engage in less modeling of effective leadership and as a result are negatively associated with informal leadership and team task performance. We do not find support for the functional leadership theory predictions that laissez-faire formal leaders are positively associated with team members’ informal leadership and team task performance, which would be due to an increased perceived need for leadership. The social learning effects are stronger for teams that are lower in member MTL and weaker for teams that are higher in member MTL. These results suggest social learning theory may be preferable to functional leadership theory for understanding informal leadership in teams.

KW - leadership

KW - motivation/self-regulation

KW - teams/group processes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057964200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057964200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/peps.12308

DO - 10.1111/peps.12308

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057964200

JO - Personnel Psychology

JF - Personnel Psychology

SN - 0031-5826

ER -