Mediators' facilitative versus controlling argument strategies and tactics

A qualitative analysis using the conversational argument coding system

Alison Trego, Daniel J. Canary, Janet Alberts, Charee Mooney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined how utilization of the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme (CACS) demonstrates mediators' use of argument behavior to facilitate or control the manner in which mediation parties argued their positions. Data were collected from a community mediation program located in the southwestern United States. Forty mediation sessions, each having a single mediator, were videotaped and transcribed. Results revealed eight mediator argument tactics that reflect a facilitative strategy and three argument tactics that represent a controlling strategy. Discussion focuses on how the CACS can demonstrate ways in which mediators promote disputants' idea development or, in some cases, impede participants' use of argument to make known their ideas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-167
Number of pages21
JournalCommunication Methods and Measures
Volume4
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

tactics
mediation
coding
utilization
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Mediators' facilitative versus controlling argument strategies and tactics : A qualitative analysis using the conversational argument coding system. / Trego, Alison; Canary, Daniel J.; Alberts, Janet; Mooney, Charee.

In: Communication Methods and Measures, Vol. 4, No. 1-2, 2010, p. 147-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0dbaeb2dd2f54ec6aef5fca6ca551737,
title = "Mediators' facilitative versus controlling argument strategies and tactics: A qualitative analysis using the conversational argument coding system",
abstract = "This study examined how utilization of the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme (CACS) demonstrates mediators' use of argument behavior to facilitate or control the manner in which mediation parties argued their positions. Data were collected from a community mediation program located in the southwestern United States. Forty mediation sessions, each having a single mediator, were videotaped and transcribed. Results revealed eight mediator argument tactics that reflect a facilitative strategy and three argument tactics that represent a controlling strategy. Discussion focuses on how the CACS can demonstrate ways in which mediators promote disputants' idea development or, in some cases, impede participants' use of argument to make known their ideas.",
author = "Alison Trego and Canary, {Daniel J.} and Janet Alberts and Charee Mooney",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/19312451003680707",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "147--167",
journal = "Communication Methods and Measures",
issn = "1931-2458",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mediators' facilitative versus controlling argument strategies and tactics

T2 - A qualitative analysis using the conversational argument coding system

AU - Trego, Alison

AU - Canary, Daniel J.

AU - Alberts, Janet

AU - Mooney, Charee

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This study examined how utilization of the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme (CACS) demonstrates mediators' use of argument behavior to facilitate or control the manner in which mediation parties argued their positions. Data were collected from a community mediation program located in the southwestern United States. Forty mediation sessions, each having a single mediator, were videotaped and transcribed. Results revealed eight mediator argument tactics that reflect a facilitative strategy and three argument tactics that represent a controlling strategy. Discussion focuses on how the CACS can demonstrate ways in which mediators promote disputants' idea development or, in some cases, impede participants' use of argument to make known their ideas.

AB - This study examined how utilization of the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme (CACS) demonstrates mediators' use of argument behavior to facilitate or control the manner in which mediation parties argued their positions. Data were collected from a community mediation program located in the southwestern United States. Forty mediation sessions, each having a single mediator, were videotaped and transcribed. Results revealed eight mediator argument tactics that reflect a facilitative strategy and three argument tactics that represent a controlling strategy. Discussion focuses on how the CACS can demonstrate ways in which mediators promote disputants' idea development or, in some cases, impede participants' use of argument to make known their ideas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960969127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960969127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19312451003680707

DO - 10.1080/19312451003680707

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 147

EP - 167

JO - Communication Methods and Measures

JF - Communication Methods and Measures

SN - 1931-2458

IS - 1-2

ER -