TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanisms of lava flow emplacement during an effusive eruption of Sinabung Volcano (Sumatra, Indonesia)
AU - Carr, Brett B.
AU - Clarke, Amanda
AU - Vanderkluysen, Loÿc
AU - Arrowsmith, Ramon
N1 - Funding Information:
BC was supported in part by summer Ph.D. student research fellowships awarded by the School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) and funded by a Graduate College University Block Grant at Arizona State University . Additional financial support came from the Bakrie Initiative for Geologic Hazards at Arizona State University . The Sinabung Volcano Observatory generously shared data and resources. The Badan Informasi Geospasial and the Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Management (CVGHM) in Indonesia provided the base DEM we used in this study. This work was enhanced by a memorandum of understanding between SESE and the Department of Geologic Engineering at the Universitas Gadjah Mada, and specifically the assistance of Dr. Agung Harijoko and Bima Eko Dhanu. We also thank SESE undergraduate student Cassandra Collins for assistance with MODIS image acquisition. Jonathan Fink, Setsuya Nakada, and Wendy McCausland provided insightful reviews that helped to improve the manuscript.
Funding Information:
BC was supported in part by summer Ph.D. student research fellowships awarded by the School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) and funded by a Graduate College University Block Grant at Arizona State University. Additional financial support came from the Bakrie Initiative for Geologic Hazards at Arizona State University. The Sinabung Volcano Observatory generously shared data and resources. The Badan Informasi Geospasial and the Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Management (CVGHM) in Indonesia provided the base DEM we used in this study. This work was enhanced by a memorandum of understanding between SESE and the Department of Geologic Engineering at the Universitas Gadjah Mada, and specifically the assistance of Dr. Agung Harijoko and Bima Eko Dhanu. We also thank SESE undergraduate student Cassandra Collins for assistance with MODIS image acquisition. Jonathan Fink, Setsuya Nakada, and Wendy McCausland provided insightful reviews that helped to improve the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors
PY - 2019/9/15
Y1 - 2019/9/15
N2 - The ongoing effusive phase of the eruption of Sinabung Volcano (Sumatra, Indonesia) began in late December 2013, and has produced a 2.9 km long andesitic lava flow with two active secondary summit lobes, frequent pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) (with ≤5 km runout distance), and associated plumes up to 5 km in height. Large intermediate to silicic composition lava flows of the type documented here are common at volcanoes around the world, but they are infrequently observed while active. This eruption provides a special opportunity to observe and study the mechanisms of emplacement and growth of an active andesitic lava flow. We use visible and thermal satellite images to document the flow and describe the dominant processes driving emplacement of the lava over the course of the eruption. Effusion and flow advance rates were at their highest in January–March 2014. A decrease in flow advance rate in late March 2014 from 20 to 70 m d−1 to <5 m d−1 was the result of a decrease in effusion rate from ~9 m3 s−1 to ~3 m3 s−1. Initial flow emplacement was most likely controlled by the yield strength of the flow crust, which we estimate to have increased in thickness from 1 to 4 m during January–June 2014, calculated from average flow surface temperatures that decreased from ~60 °C to <30 °C during this period. Further decrease in flow advance rate in June 2014 to ~1 m d−1 suggests that the flow's interior had cooled, and that propagation was limited by the yield strength of the flow's interior (core). Inflation of the flow during this period of core-controlled slow advance eventually caused lava to overtop ridges bounding the flow near the summit, and created significant gravitational instabilities. These instabilities led to collapse of the upper portions of the lava flow and generated PDCs, followed by breakout of new flow lobes from the collapse scars in October 2014 and June 2015. Effusion continues as of June 2017 and presents a significant hazard for collapse and generation of PDCs. This ongoing activity appears to represent a typical eruption of Sinabung, with flow length and area similar to numerous older flows observed around the volcano.
AB - The ongoing effusive phase of the eruption of Sinabung Volcano (Sumatra, Indonesia) began in late December 2013, and has produced a 2.9 km long andesitic lava flow with two active secondary summit lobes, frequent pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) (with ≤5 km runout distance), and associated plumes up to 5 km in height. Large intermediate to silicic composition lava flows of the type documented here are common at volcanoes around the world, but they are infrequently observed while active. This eruption provides a special opportunity to observe and study the mechanisms of emplacement and growth of an active andesitic lava flow. We use visible and thermal satellite images to document the flow and describe the dominant processes driving emplacement of the lava over the course of the eruption. Effusion and flow advance rates were at their highest in January–March 2014. A decrease in flow advance rate in late March 2014 from 20 to 70 m d−1 to <5 m d−1 was the result of a decrease in effusion rate from ~9 m3 s−1 to ~3 m3 s−1. Initial flow emplacement was most likely controlled by the yield strength of the flow crust, which we estimate to have increased in thickness from 1 to 4 m during January–June 2014, calculated from average flow surface temperatures that decreased from ~60 °C to <30 °C during this period. Further decrease in flow advance rate in June 2014 to ~1 m d−1 suggests that the flow's interior had cooled, and that propagation was limited by the yield strength of the flow's interior (core). Inflation of the flow during this period of core-controlled slow advance eventually caused lava to overtop ridges bounding the flow near the summit, and created significant gravitational instabilities. These instabilities led to collapse of the upper portions of the lava flow and generated PDCs, followed by breakout of new flow lobes from the collapse scars in October 2014 and June 2015. Effusion continues as of June 2017 and presents a significant hazard for collapse and generation of PDCs. This ongoing activity appears to represent a typical eruption of Sinabung, with flow length and area similar to numerous older flows observed around the volcano.
KW - Effusion rate
KW - Effusive eruption
KW - Lava flow emplacement
KW - Satellite remote sensing
KW - Silicic lava flow
KW - Sinabung
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044102085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044102085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044102085
SN - 0377-0273
VL - 382
SP - 137
EP - 148
JO - Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
JF - Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
ER -