Mechanical engineering technology

ASME vision 2030's call for the future

Scott Danielson, Allan Kirkpatrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, various professional societies or individuals such as the American Society of Civil Engineers (2008) or James Duderstadt (2008) have put forth statements outlining how engineering and engineering education should adapt to better meet the needs of society several decades in the future. Often, these studies do not specifically address engineering technology's role as a part of the educational and professional spectrum. Building on these previous works, this paper presents suggestions for changes to improve mechanical engineering technology education for the future. However, while focused on mechanical engineering technology, many of the points in the paper apply to all types of engineering technology education. The strengths of engineering technology graduates as engineering practitioners and as implementers of technology, job-ready, and focused on applied engineering are answers to what industry has told academia about the current needs of industry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-48
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Engineering Technology
Volume29
Issue number2
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Engineering technology
Mechanical engineering
Education
Engineering education
Industry
Engineers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Mechanical engineering technology : ASME vision 2030's call for the future. / Danielson, Scott; Kirkpatrick, Allan.

In: Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.09.2012, p. 42-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{496fa563035d437cb7005128139ab996,
title = "Mechanical engineering technology: ASME vision 2030's call for the future",
abstract = "In recent years, various professional societies or individuals such as the American Society of Civil Engineers (2008) or James Duderstadt (2008) have put forth statements outlining how engineering and engineering education should adapt to better meet the needs of society several decades in the future. Often, these studies do not specifically address engineering technology's role as a part of the educational and professional spectrum. Building on these previous works, this paper presents suggestions for changes to improve mechanical engineering technology education for the future. However, while focused on mechanical engineering technology, many of the points in the paper apply to all types of engineering technology education. The strengths of engineering technology graduates as engineering practitioners and as implementers of technology, job-ready, and focused on applied engineering are answers to what industry has told academia about the current needs of industry.",
author = "Scott Danielson and Allan Kirkpatrick",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "42--48",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Technology",
issn = "0747-9664",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical engineering technology

T2 - ASME vision 2030's call for the future

AU - Danielson, Scott

AU - Kirkpatrick, Allan

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - In recent years, various professional societies or individuals such as the American Society of Civil Engineers (2008) or James Duderstadt (2008) have put forth statements outlining how engineering and engineering education should adapt to better meet the needs of society several decades in the future. Often, these studies do not specifically address engineering technology's role as a part of the educational and professional spectrum. Building on these previous works, this paper presents suggestions for changes to improve mechanical engineering technology education for the future. However, while focused on mechanical engineering technology, many of the points in the paper apply to all types of engineering technology education. The strengths of engineering technology graduates as engineering practitioners and as implementers of technology, job-ready, and focused on applied engineering are answers to what industry has told academia about the current needs of industry.

AB - In recent years, various professional societies or individuals such as the American Society of Civil Engineers (2008) or James Duderstadt (2008) have put forth statements outlining how engineering and engineering education should adapt to better meet the needs of society several decades in the future. Often, these studies do not specifically address engineering technology's role as a part of the educational and professional spectrum. Building on these previous works, this paper presents suggestions for changes to improve mechanical engineering technology education for the future. However, while focused on mechanical engineering technology, many of the points in the paper apply to all types of engineering technology education. The strengths of engineering technology graduates as engineering practitioners and as implementers of technology, job-ready, and focused on applied engineering are answers to what industry has told academia about the current needs of industry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884320349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884320349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 42

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Engineering Technology

JF - Journal of Engineering Technology

SN - 0747-9664

IS - 2

ER -