Measuring Youths’ Perceptions of Police: Evidence From the Crossroads Study

Adam D. Fine, Jordan Beardslee, Ryan Mays, Paul J. Frick, Laurence Steinberg, Elizabeth Cauffman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The literature on perceptions of police is growing, yet the enthusiasm is outpacing methodological rigor. This study (a) examined the factor structure of items assessing procedural justice and legitimacy, (b) tested whether the factors were uniquely associated with youth self-reported offending (SRO), and (c) identified whether effects on subsequent SRO operated through legitimacy. Using data derived from the 1,216 youth in the Crossroads Study, as well as supplemental models with Pathways to Desistance data, factor analyses established a factor structure, negative binomial regressions examined associations with SRO, and indirect effects analysis within a structural equation model framework identified whether associations on SRO operated through legitimacy. A five-factor solution emerged: Voice, Neutrality/ Impartiality, Distributive Justice/Bias, Respect, and Legitimacy. In the adjusted model, only Distributive Justice/Bias and Legitimacy were directly associated with concurrent SRO. However, all procedural justice scales had indirect effects on subsequent offending through legitimacy. Implications for methodology and procedural justice theory are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)92-107
    Number of pages16
    JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 14 2021

    Keywords

    • Juvenile justice
    • Legal socialization
    • Legitimacy
    • Policing
    • Procedural justice

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Youths’ Perceptions of Police: Evidence From the Crossroads Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this