Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services

Daniel J. Mullin, Lee Hargreaves, Andrea Auxier, Stephanie A. Brennhofer, Juvena R. Hitt, Rodger Kessler, Benjamin Littenberg, Charles Macchi, Matthew Martin, Gail Rose, Felicia Trembath, Constance van Eeghen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To perform a factor analysis of the Practice Integration Profile (PIP), a 30-item practice-level measure of primary care and behavioral health integration derived from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Lexicon for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration. Data Sources: The PIP was completed by 735 individuals, representing 357 practices across the United States. Study Design: The study design was a cross-sectional survey. An exploratory factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency reliability via Cronbach's alpha were performed. Data Collection Methods: Participant responses were collected using REDCap, a secure, web-based data capture tool. Principal Findings: Five of the PIP's six domains had factor loadings for most items related to each factor representing the PIP of 0.50 or greater. However, one factor had items from two PIP domains that had loadings >0.50. A five-factor model with redistributed items resulted in improved factor loadings for all domains along with greater internal consistency reliability (>0.80). Conclusions: Five of the PIP's six domains demonstrated excellent internal consistency for measures of health care resources. Although minor improvements to strengthen the PIP are possible, it is a valid and reliable measure of the integration of primary care and behavioral health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Services Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Health Services
Primary Health Care
Statistical Factor Analysis
Health Resources
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health Services Research
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • collaborative care
  • integrated behavioral health
  • integrated primary care
  • primary care behavioral health
  • psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Mullin, D. J., Hargreaves, L., Auxier, A., Brennhofer, S. A., Hitt, J. R., Kessler, R., ... van Eeghen, C. (2019). Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13117

Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services. / Mullin, Daniel J.; Hargreaves, Lee; Auxier, Andrea; Brennhofer, Stephanie A.; Hitt, Juvena R.; Kessler, Rodger; Littenberg, Benjamin; Macchi, Charles; Martin, Matthew; Rose, Gail; Trembath, Felicia; van Eeghen, Constance.

In: Health Services Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mullin, DJ, Hargreaves, L, Auxier, A, Brennhofer, SA, Hitt, JR, Kessler, R, Littenberg, B, Macchi, C, Martin, M, Rose, G, Trembath, F & van Eeghen, C 2019, 'Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services', Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13117
Mullin, Daniel J. ; Hargreaves, Lee ; Auxier, Andrea ; Brennhofer, Stephanie A. ; Hitt, Juvena R. ; Kessler, Rodger ; Littenberg, Benjamin ; Macchi, Charles ; Martin, Matthew ; Rose, Gail ; Trembath, Felicia ; van Eeghen, Constance. / Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services. In: Health Services Research. 2019.
@article{6b4af2cb6d654850826a3dd24f3fb1a2,
title = "Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services",
abstract = "Objective: To perform a factor analysis of the Practice Integration Profile (PIP), a 30-item practice-level measure of primary care and behavioral health integration derived from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Lexicon for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration. Data Sources: The PIP was completed by 735 individuals, representing 357 practices across the United States. Study Design: The study design was a cross-sectional survey. An exploratory factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency reliability via Cronbach's alpha were performed. Data Collection Methods: Participant responses were collected using REDCap, a secure, web-based data capture tool. Principal Findings: Five of the PIP's six domains had factor loadings for most items related to each factor representing the PIP of 0.50 or greater. However, one factor had items from two PIP domains that had loadings >0.50. A five-factor model with redistributed items resulted in improved factor loadings for all domains along with greater internal consistency reliability (>0.80). Conclusions: Five of the PIP's six domains demonstrated excellent internal consistency for measures of health care resources. Although minor improvements to strengthen the PIP are possible, it is a valid and reliable measure of the integration of primary care and behavioral health.",
keywords = "collaborative care, integrated behavioral health, integrated primary care, primary care behavioral health, psychometrics",
author = "Mullin, {Daniel J.} and Lee Hargreaves and Andrea Auxier and Brennhofer, {Stephanie A.} and Hitt, {Juvena R.} and Rodger Kessler and Benjamin Littenberg and Charles Macchi and Matthew Martin and Gail Rose and Felicia Trembath and {van Eeghen}, Constance",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.13117",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services

AU - Mullin, Daniel J.

AU - Hargreaves, Lee

AU - Auxier, Andrea

AU - Brennhofer, Stephanie A.

AU - Hitt, Juvena R.

AU - Kessler, Rodger

AU - Littenberg, Benjamin

AU - Macchi, Charles

AU - Martin, Matthew

AU - Rose, Gail

AU - Trembath, Felicia

AU - van Eeghen, Constance

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To perform a factor analysis of the Practice Integration Profile (PIP), a 30-item practice-level measure of primary care and behavioral health integration derived from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Lexicon for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration. Data Sources: The PIP was completed by 735 individuals, representing 357 practices across the United States. Study Design: The study design was a cross-sectional survey. An exploratory factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency reliability via Cronbach's alpha were performed. Data Collection Methods: Participant responses were collected using REDCap, a secure, web-based data capture tool. Principal Findings: Five of the PIP's six domains had factor loadings for most items related to each factor representing the PIP of 0.50 or greater. However, one factor had items from two PIP domains that had loadings >0.50. A five-factor model with redistributed items resulted in improved factor loadings for all domains along with greater internal consistency reliability (>0.80). Conclusions: Five of the PIP's six domains demonstrated excellent internal consistency for measures of health care resources. Although minor improvements to strengthen the PIP are possible, it is a valid and reliable measure of the integration of primary care and behavioral health.

AB - Objective: To perform a factor analysis of the Practice Integration Profile (PIP), a 30-item practice-level measure of primary care and behavioral health integration derived from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Lexicon for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration. Data Sources: The PIP was completed by 735 individuals, representing 357 practices across the United States. Study Design: The study design was a cross-sectional survey. An exploratory factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency reliability via Cronbach's alpha were performed. Data Collection Methods: Participant responses were collected using REDCap, a secure, web-based data capture tool. Principal Findings: Five of the PIP's six domains had factor loadings for most items related to each factor representing the PIP of 0.50 or greater. However, one factor had items from two PIP domains that had loadings >0.50. A five-factor model with redistributed items resulted in improved factor loadings for all domains along with greater internal consistency reliability (>0.80). Conclusions: Five of the PIP's six domains demonstrated excellent internal consistency for measures of health care resources. Although minor improvements to strengthen the PIP are possible, it is a valid and reliable measure of the integration of primary care and behavioral health.

KW - collaborative care

KW - integrated behavioral health

KW - integrated primary care

KW - primary care behavioral health

KW - psychometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061184723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061184723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.13117

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.13117

M3 - Article

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

ER -