Measuring team knowledge

Nancy Cooke, Eduardo Salas, Janis A. Cannon-Bowers, Renée J. Stout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

310 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multioperator tasks often require complex cognitive processing at the team level. Many team cognitive processes, such as situation assessment and coordination, are thought to rely on team knowledge. Team knowledge is multifaceted and comprises relatively generic knowledge in the form of team mental models and more specific team situation models. In this methodological review paper, we review recent efforts to measure team knowledge in the context of mapping specific methods onto features of targeted team knowledge. Team knowledge features include type, homogeneity versus heterogeneity, and rate of knowledge change. Measurement features include knowledge elicitation method, team metric, and aggregation method. When available, we highlight analytical conclusions or empirical data that support a connection between team knowledge and measurement method. In addition, we present empirical results concerning the relation between team knowledge and performance for each measurement method and identify research and methodological needs. Addressing issues surrounding the measurement of team knowledge is a prerequisite to understanding team cognition and its relation to team performance and to designing training programs or devices to facilitate team cognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-173
Number of pages23
JournalHuman Factors
Volume42
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cognition
Knowledge acquisition
Agglomeration
measurement method
Education
Processing
Equipment and Supplies
cognition
Research
aggregation
performance
training program
knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Cooke, N., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Stout, R. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151-173.

Measuring team knowledge. / Cooke, Nancy; Salas, Eduardo; Cannon-Bowers, Janis A.; Stout, Renée J.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 42, No. 1, 03.2000, p. 151-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cooke, N, Salas, E, Cannon-Bowers, JA & Stout, RJ 2000, 'Measuring team knowledge', Human Factors, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 151-173.
Cooke N, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA, Stout RJ. Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors. 2000 Mar;42(1):151-173.
Cooke, Nancy ; Salas, Eduardo ; Cannon-Bowers, Janis A. ; Stout, Renée J. / Measuring team knowledge. In: Human Factors. 2000 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 151-173.
@article{1806e4495bfa4366b3d09ccad858f336,
title = "Measuring team knowledge",
abstract = "Multioperator tasks often require complex cognitive processing at the team level. Many team cognitive processes, such as situation assessment and coordination, are thought to rely on team knowledge. Team knowledge is multifaceted and comprises relatively generic knowledge in the form of team mental models and more specific team situation models. In this methodological review paper, we review recent efforts to measure team knowledge in the context of mapping specific methods onto features of targeted team knowledge. Team knowledge features include type, homogeneity versus heterogeneity, and rate of knowledge change. Measurement features include knowledge elicitation method, team metric, and aggregation method. When available, we highlight analytical conclusions or empirical data that support a connection between team knowledge and measurement method. In addition, we present empirical results concerning the relation between team knowledge and performance for each measurement method and identify research and methodological needs. Addressing issues surrounding the measurement of team knowledge is a prerequisite to understanding team cognition and its relation to team performance and to designing training programs or devices to facilitate team cognition.",
author = "Nancy Cooke and Eduardo Salas and Cannon-Bowers, {Janis A.} and Stout, {Ren{\'e}e J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "151--173",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring team knowledge

AU - Cooke, Nancy

AU - Salas, Eduardo

AU - Cannon-Bowers, Janis A.

AU - Stout, Renée J.

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Multioperator tasks often require complex cognitive processing at the team level. Many team cognitive processes, such as situation assessment and coordination, are thought to rely on team knowledge. Team knowledge is multifaceted and comprises relatively generic knowledge in the form of team mental models and more specific team situation models. In this methodological review paper, we review recent efforts to measure team knowledge in the context of mapping specific methods onto features of targeted team knowledge. Team knowledge features include type, homogeneity versus heterogeneity, and rate of knowledge change. Measurement features include knowledge elicitation method, team metric, and aggregation method. When available, we highlight analytical conclusions or empirical data that support a connection between team knowledge and measurement method. In addition, we present empirical results concerning the relation between team knowledge and performance for each measurement method and identify research and methodological needs. Addressing issues surrounding the measurement of team knowledge is a prerequisite to understanding team cognition and its relation to team performance and to designing training programs or devices to facilitate team cognition.

AB - Multioperator tasks often require complex cognitive processing at the team level. Many team cognitive processes, such as situation assessment and coordination, are thought to rely on team knowledge. Team knowledge is multifaceted and comprises relatively generic knowledge in the form of team mental models and more specific team situation models. In this methodological review paper, we review recent efforts to measure team knowledge in the context of mapping specific methods onto features of targeted team knowledge. Team knowledge features include type, homogeneity versus heterogeneity, and rate of knowledge change. Measurement features include knowledge elicitation method, team metric, and aggregation method. When available, we highlight analytical conclusions or empirical data that support a connection between team knowledge and measurement method. In addition, we present empirical results concerning the relation between team knowledge and performance for each measurement method and identify research and methodological needs. Addressing issues surrounding the measurement of team knowledge is a prerequisite to understanding team cognition and its relation to team performance and to designing training programs or devices to facilitate team cognition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033921084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033921084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10917151

AN - SCOPUS:0033921084

VL - 42

SP - 151

EP - 173

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 1

ER -