Measuring Judicial Activism

Stefanie Lindquist, Frank B. Cross

Research output: Book/ReportBook

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This book explores the theoretical and empirical dimensions to this controversial subject. The main aim of the book is to shift the focus of the academic and political debate over judicial activism to a more objective, empirically-based approach to analyzing activism in appellate courts. Focusing on the justices' voting behavior on the United States Supreme Court from 1954 to 2004, the book first identifies theoretical dimensions to judicial activism based on scholars' attention to the Court's potential for countermajoritarian action. In particular, the book considers the propensity of the justices to (1) strike down legislation enacted by state and federal elected officials, (2) invalidate executive branch actions in connection with judicial review of administrative agencies, (3) expand the power of the federal judiciary through increasing access to the courts, and (4) alter prevailing legal rules by overturning precedent. All of these dimensions are also evaluated in terms of the justices' propensities to vote in these areas in accordance with their own personal policy preferences. The final chapter creates a "judicial activism scale" for the justices serving on the Court during the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages192
ISBN (Electronic)9780199870790
ISBN (Print)9780195370850
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Activism
Justice
Propensity
Final Chapter
Voting Behavior
Legislation
Appellate Court
Judiciary
Political Debate
Supreme Court
Judicial Review
William Rehnquist

Keywords

  • Countermajoritarianism
  • Judicial activism
  • Judicial decision making
  • Judicial restraint
  • Supreme court

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Measuring Judicial Activism. / Lindquist, Stefanie; Cross, Frank B.

Oxford University Press, 2009. 192 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Lindquist, Stefanie ; Cross, Frank B. / Measuring Judicial Activism. Oxford University Press, 2009. 192 p.
@book{ffa0fcf0bf6a47bca646bfb0c6e0982e,
title = "Measuring Judicial Activism",
abstract = "This book explores the theoretical and empirical dimensions to this controversial subject. The main aim of the book is to shift the focus of the academic and political debate over judicial activism to a more objective, empirically-based approach to analyzing activism in appellate courts. Focusing on the justices' voting behavior on the United States Supreme Court from 1954 to 2004, the book first identifies theoretical dimensions to judicial activism based on scholars' attention to the Court's potential for countermajoritarian action. In particular, the book considers the propensity of the justices to (1) strike down legislation enacted by state and federal elected officials, (2) invalidate executive branch actions in connection with judicial review of administrative agencies, (3) expand the power of the federal judiciary through increasing access to the courts, and (4) alter prevailing legal rules by overturning precedent. All of these dimensions are also evaluated in terms of the justices' propensities to vote in these areas in accordance with their own personal policy preferences. The final chapter creates a {"}judicial activism scale{"} for the justices serving on the Court during the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts.",
keywords = "Countermajoritarianism, Judicial activism, Judicial decision making, Judicial restraint, Supreme court",
author = "Stefanie Lindquist and Cross, {Frank B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195370850.001.0001",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780195370850",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Measuring Judicial Activism

AU - Lindquist, Stefanie

AU - Cross, Frank B.

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - This book explores the theoretical and empirical dimensions to this controversial subject. The main aim of the book is to shift the focus of the academic and political debate over judicial activism to a more objective, empirically-based approach to analyzing activism in appellate courts. Focusing on the justices' voting behavior on the United States Supreme Court from 1954 to 2004, the book first identifies theoretical dimensions to judicial activism based on scholars' attention to the Court's potential for countermajoritarian action. In particular, the book considers the propensity of the justices to (1) strike down legislation enacted by state and federal elected officials, (2) invalidate executive branch actions in connection with judicial review of administrative agencies, (3) expand the power of the federal judiciary through increasing access to the courts, and (4) alter prevailing legal rules by overturning precedent. All of these dimensions are also evaluated in terms of the justices' propensities to vote in these areas in accordance with their own personal policy preferences. The final chapter creates a "judicial activism scale" for the justices serving on the Court during the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts.

AB - This book explores the theoretical and empirical dimensions to this controversial subject. The main aim of the book is to shift the focus of the academic and political debate over judicial activism to a more objective, empirically-based approach to analyzing activism in appellate courts. Focusing on the justices' voting behavior on the United States Supreme Court from 1954 to 2004, the book first identifies theoretical dimensions to judicial activism based on scholars' attention to the Court's potential for countermajoritarian action. In particular, the book considers the propensity of the justices to (1) strike down legislation enacted by state and federal elected officials, (2) invalidate executive branch actions in connection with judicial review of administrative agencies, (3) expand the power of the federal judiciary through increasing access to the courts, and (4) alter prevailing legal rules by overturning precedent. All of these dimensions are also evaluated in terms of the justices' propensities to vote in these areas in accordance with their own personal policy preferences. The final chapter creates a "judicial activism scale" for the justices serving on the Court during the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts.

KW - Countermajoritarianism

KW - Judicial activism

KW - Judicial decision making

KW - Judicial restraint

KW - Supreme court

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949107991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69949107991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195370850.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195370850.001.0001

M3 - Book

SN - 9780195370850

BT - Measuring Judicial Activism

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -