Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies

Challenges and successes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a heightened understanding that metacognition and strategy use are crucial to deep, long-lasting comprehension and learning, but their assessment is challenging. First, students' judgments of what their abilities and habits and measurements of their performance often do not match. Second, students tend to learn and comprehend differently depending on the subject matter, contexts, goals, and tasks. As a consequence, a student may appear to use deep, reflective strategies in one situation, and fail to do so in other circumstances. Third, it is generally assumed that strategy use (metacognition, metacomprehension) are separable constructs from the underlying skills germane to the target task. The studies described in this issue draw attention to the potential challenges to developing a pure (separable) measure of strategy use that is also reliable, valid, and contextualized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-203
Number of pages9
JournalMetacognition and Learning
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

learning success
learning strategy
comprehension
student
habits
ability
learning
performance

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Learning
  • Metacognition
  • Metacomprehension
  • Strategy use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies : Challenges and successes. / McNamara, Danielle.

In: Metacognition and Learning, Vol. 6, No. 2, 08.2011, p. 195-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c42f6c8322994023b8f4a69014e21a2b,
title = "Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: Challenges and successes",
abstract = "There is a heightened understanding that metacognition and strategy use are crucial to deep, long-lasting comprehension and learning, but their assessment is challenging. First, students' judgments of what their abilities and habits and measurements of their performance often do not match. Second, students tend to learn and comprehend differently depending on the subject matter, contexts, goals, and tasks. As a consequence, a student may appear to use deep, reflective strategies in one situation, and fail to do so in other circumstances. Third, it is generally assumed that strategy use (metacognition, metacomprehension) are separable constructs from the underlying skills germane to the target task. The studies described in this issue draw attention to the potential challenges to developing a pure (separable) measure of strategy use that is also reliable, valid, and contextualized.",
keywords = "Assessment, Learning, Metacognition, Metacomprehension, Strategy use",
author = "Danielle McNamara",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s11409-011-9082-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "195--203",
journal = "Metacognition and Learning",
issn = "1556-1623",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies

T2 - Challenges and successes

AU - McNamara, Danielle

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - There is a heightened understanding that metacognition and strategy use are crucial to deep, long-lasting comprehension and learning, but their assessment is challenging. First, students' judgments of what their abilities and habits and measurements of their performance often do not match. Second, students tend to learn and comprehend differently depending on the subject matter, contexts, goals, and tasks. As a consequence, a student may appear to use deep, reflective strategies in one situation, and fail to do so in other circumstances. Third, it is generally assumed that strategy use (metacognition, metacomprehension) are separable constructs from the underlying skills germane to the target task. The studies described in this issue draw attention to the potential challenges to developing a pure (separable) measure of strategy use that is also reliable, valid, and contextualized.

AB - There is a heightened understanding that metacognition and strategy use are crucial to deep, long-lasting comprehension and learning, but their assessment is challenging. First, students' judgments of what their abilities and habits and measurements of their performance often do not match. Second, students tend to learn and comprehend differently depending on the subject matter, contexts, goals, and tasks. As a consequence, a student may appear to use deep, reflective strategies in one situation, and fail to do so in other circumstances. Third, it is generally assumed that strategy use (metacognition, metacomprehension) are separable constructs from the underlying skills germane to the target task. The studies described in this issue draw attention to the potential challenges to developing a pure (separable) measure of strategy use that is also reliable, valid, and contextualized.

KW - Assessment

KW - Learning

KW - Metacognition

KW - Metacomprehension

KW - Strategy use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960728668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960728668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11409-011-9082-8

DO - 10.1007/s11409-011-9082-8

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 195

EP - 203

JO - Metacognition and Learning

JF - Metacognition and Learning

SN - 1556-1623

IS - 2

ER -