Abstract

This study was based around the creation of a tool to measure students computing self-efficacy. The tool was an eight-question survey that was validated using content and criterion-related validity. Content validity was conducted to make sure that the questions related to each other and related to the subject of computing self-efficacy. Criterion-related validity allowed us to validate that our tool could test people with different levels of computing skills based on previous experience. The study allowed us to further validate our tool as well as analyze the computing self-efficacy of 270 students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
StatePublished - 2013
Event120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - Atlanta, GA, United States
Duration: Jun 23 2013Jun 26 2013

Other

Other120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta, GA
Period6/23/136/26/13

Fingerprint

Students
STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Kolar, H., Carberry, A., & Amresh, A. (2013). Measuring computing self-efficacy. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Measuring computing self-efficacy. / Kolar, Hannah; Carberry, Adam; Amresh, Ashish.

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 2013.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Kolar, H, Carberry, A & Amresh, A 2013, Measuring computing self-efficacy. in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, United States, 6/23/13.
Kolar H, Carberry A, Amresh A. Measuring computing self-efficacy. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 2013
Kolar, Hannah ; Carberry, Adam ; Amresh, Ashish. / Measuring computing self-efficacy. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 2013.
@inproceedings{9e5750e70c3d455db2c6aa6aa0692093,
title = "Measuring computing self-efficacy",
abstract = "This study was based around the creation of a tool to measure students computing self-efficacy. The tool was an eight-question survey that was validated using content and criterion-related validity. Content validity was conducted to make sure that the questions related to each other and related to the subject of computing self-efficacy. Criterion-related validity allowed us to validate that our tool could test people with different levels of computing skills based on previous experience. The study allowed us to further validate our tool as well as analyze the computing self-efficacy of 270 students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors.",
author = "Hannah Kolar and Adam Carberry and Ashish Amresh",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Measuring computing self-efficacy

AU - Kolar, Hannah

AU - Carberry, Adam

AU - Amresh, Ashish

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This study was based around the creation of a tool to measure students computing self-efficacy. The tool was an eight-question survey that was validated using content and criterion-related validity. Content validity was conducted to make sure that the questions related to each other and related to the subject of computing self-efficacy. Criterion-related validity allowed us to validate that our tool could test people with different levels of computing skills based on previous experience. The study allowed us to further validate our tool as well as analyze the computing self-efficacy of 270 students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors.

AB - This study was based around the creation of a tool to measure students computing self-efficacy. The tool was an eight-question survey that was validated using content and criterion-related validity. Content validity was conducted to make sure that the questions related to each other and related to the subject of computing self-efficacy. Criterion-related validity allowed us to validate that our tool could test people with different levels of computing skills based on previous experience. The study allowed us to further validate our tool as well as analyze the computing self-efficacy of 270 students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884310354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884310354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84884310354

BT - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

ER -