Measuring Automatic Cognition: Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology

Andrew Miles, Raphael Charron-Chenier, Cyrus Schleifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Dual-process models are increasingly popular in sociology as a framework for theorizing the role of automatic cognition in shaping social behavior. However, empirical studies using dual-process models often rely on ad hoc measures such as forced-choice surveys, observation, and interviews whose relationships to underlying cognitive processes are not fully established. In this article, we advance dual-process research in sociology by (1) proposing criteria for measuring automatic cognition, and (2) assessing the empirical performance of two popular measures of automatic cognition developed by psychologists. We compare the ability of the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT), the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), and traditional forced-choice measures to predict process-pure estimates of automatic influences on individuals’ behavior during a survey task. Results from three studies focusing on politics, morality, and racial attitudes suggest the AMP provides the most valid and consistent measure of automatic cognitive processes. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for sociological practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)308-333
Number of pages26
JournalAmerican Sociological Review
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

research process
cognition
sociology
social behavior
psychologist
morality
politics
ability
interview
performance

Keywords

  • automatic cognition
  • dual-process models
  • measurement
  • practical consciousness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Measuring Automatic Cognition : Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology. / Miles, Andrew; Charron-Chenier, Raphael; Schleifer, Cyrus.

In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 308-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5f741be67764450be6831f2fc07d93a,
title = "Measuring Automatic Cognition: Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology",
abstract = "Dual-process models are increasingly popular in sociology as a framework for theorizing the role of automatic cognition in shaping social behavior. However, empirical studies using dual-process models often rely on ad hoc measures such as forced-choice surveys, observation, and interviews whose relationships to underlying cognitive processes are not fully established. In this article, we advance dual-process research in sociology by (1) proposing criteria for measuring automatic cognition, and (2) assessing the empirical performance of two popular measures of automatic cognition developed by psychologists. We compare the ability of the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT), the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), and traditional forced-choice measures to predict process-pure estimates of automatic influences on individuals’ behavior during a survey task. Results from three studies focusing on politics, morality, and racial attitudes suggest the AMP provides the most valid and consistent measure of automatic cognitive processes. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for sociological practice.",
keywords = "automatic cognition, dual-process models, measurement, practical consciousness",
author = "Andrew Miles and Raphael Charron-Chenier and Cyrus Schleifer",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0003122419832497",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "308--333",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Automatic Cognition

T2 - Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology

AU - Miles, Andrew

AU - Charron-Chenier, Raphael

AU - Schleifer, Cyrus

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Dual-process models are increasingly popular in sociology as a framework for theorizing the role of automatic cognition in shaping social behavior. However, empirical studies using dual-process models often rely on ad hoc measures such as forced-choice surveys, observation, and interviews whose relationships to underlying cognitive processes are not fully established. In this article, we advance dual-process research in sociology by (1) proposing criteria for measuring automatic cognition, and (2) assessing the empirical performance of two popular measures of automatic cognition developed by psychologists. We compare the ability of the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT), the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), and traditional forced-choice measures to predict process-pure estimates of automatic influences on individuals’ behavior during a survey task. Results from three studies focusing on politics, morality, and racial attitudes suggest the AMP provides the most valid and consistent measure of automatic cognitive processes. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for sociological practice.

AB - Dual-process models are increasingly popular in sociology as a framework for theorizing the role of automatic cognition in shaping social behavior. However, empirical studies using dual-process models often rely on ad hoc measures such as forced-choice surveys, observation, and interviews whose relationships to underlying cognitive processes are not fully established. In this article, we advance dual-process research in sociology by (1) proposing criteria for measuring automatic cognition, and (2) assessing the empirical performance of two popular measures of automatic cognition developed by psychologists. We compare the ability of the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT), the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), and traditional forced-choice measures to predict process-pure estimates of automatic influences on individuals’ behavior during a survey task. Results from three studies focusing on politics, morality, and racial attitudes suggest the AMP provides the most valid and consistent measure of automatic cognitive processes. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for sociological practice.

KW - automatic cognition

KW - dual-process models

KW - measurement

KW - practical consciousness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063014989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063014989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003122419832497

DO - 10.1177/0003122419832497

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063014989

VL - 84

SP - 308

EP - 333

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 2

ER -