Measuring agricultural knowledge and adoption

Florence Kondylis, Valerie Mueller, S. Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the tradeoffs in improving the precision of agricultural measures through survey design is crucial. Yet, standard indicators used to determine program effectiveness may be flawed, and at a differential rate for men and women. We use a household survey from Mozambique to estimate the measurement error from male and female self-reports of their adoption and knowledge of three practices: intercropping, mulching, and strip tillage. Despite clear differences in human and physical capital, there are no obvious differences in the knowledge, adoption, and error in self-reporting between men and women. Having received training unanimously lowers knowledge misreports and increases adoption misreports. Other determinants of reporting error differ by gender. Misreporting is positively associated with a greater number of plots for men. Recall decay on measures of knowledge appears prominent among men but not women. Findings from regression and cost-effectiveness analyses always favor the collection of objective measures of knowledge. Given the lowest rate of accuracy for adoption was around 80%, costlier objective adoption measures are recommended for a subsample in regions with heterogeneous farm sizes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-462
Number of pages14
JournalAgricultural Economics (United Kingdom)
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

strip tillage
household surveys
Mozambique
farm size
mulching
cost effectiveness
intercropping
deterioration
gender
Physical capital
Survey design
Self-report
Cost-effectiveness
Farm size
Trade-offs
Household survey
Self-reporting
Human capital
Intercropping
Misreporting

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Gender
  • Measurement error
  • Objective adoption
  • Objective knowledge
  • Self-reported adoption
  • Self-reported knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Measuring agricultural knowledge and adoption. / Kondylis, Florence; Mueller, Valerie; Zhu, S.

In: Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), Vol. 46, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 449-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kondylis, Florence ; Mueller, Valerie ; Zhu, S. / Measuring agricultural knowledge and adoption. In: Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom). 2015 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 449-462.
@article{7800c9e93a6f438ba16d0b464976d66c,
title = "Measuring agricultural knowledge and adoption",
abstract = "Understanding the tradeoffs in improving the precision of agricultural measures through survey design is crucial. Yet, standard indicators used to determine program effectiveness may be flawed, and at a differential rate for men and women. We use a household survey from Mozambique to estimate the measurement error from male and female self-reports of their adoption and knowledge of three practices: intercropping, mulching, and strip tillage. Despite clear differences in human and physical capital, there are no obvious differences in the knowledge, adoption, and error in self-reporting between men and women. Having received training unanimously lowers knowledge misreports and increases adoption misreports. Other determinants of reporting error differ by gender. Misreporting is positively associated with a greater number of plots for men. Recall decay on measures of knowledge appears prominent among men but not women. Findings from regression and cost-effectiveness analyses always favor the collection of objective measures of knowledge. Given the lowest rate of accuracy for adoption was around 80{\%}, costlier objective adoption measures are recommended for a subsample in regions with heterogeneous farm sizes.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Gender, Measurement error, Objective adoption, Objective knowledge, Self-reported adoption, Self-reported knowledge",
author = "Florence Kondylis and Valerie Mueller and S. Zhu",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/agec.12173",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "449--462",
journal = "Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)",
issn = "0169-5150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring agricultural knowledge and adoption

AU - Kondylis, Florence

AU - Mueller, Valerie

AU - Zhu, S.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Understanding the tradeoffs in improving the precision of agricultural measures through survey design is crucial. Yet, standard indicators used to determine program effectiveness may be flawed, and at a differential rate for men and women. We use a household survey from Mozambique to estimate the measurement error from male and female self-reports of their adoption and knowledge of three practices: intercropping, mulching, and strip tillage. Despite clear differences in human and physical capital, there are no obvious differences in the knowledge, adoption, and error in self-reporting between men and women. Having received training unanimously lowers knowledge misreports and increases adoption misreports. Other determinants of reporting error differ by gender. Misreporting is positively associated with a greater number of plots for men. Recall decay on measures of knowledge appears prominent among men but not women. Findings from regression and cost-effectiveness analyses always favor the collection of objective measures of knowledge. Given the lowest rate of accuracy for adoption was around 80%, costlier objective adoption measures are recommended for a subsample in regions with heterogeneous farm sizes.

AB - Understanding the tradeoffs in improving the precision of agricultural measures through survey design is crucial. Yet, standard indicators used to determine program effectiveness may be flawed, and at a differential rate for men and women. We use a household survey from Mozambique to estimate the measurement error from male and female self-reports of their adoption and knowledge of three practices: intercropping, mulching, and strip tillage. Despite clear differences in human and physical capital, there are no obvious differences in the knowledge, adoption, and error in self-reporting between men and women. Having received training unanimously lowers knowledge misreports and increases adoption misreports. Other determinants of reporting error differ by gender. Misreporting is positively associated with a greater number of plots for men. Recall decay on measures of knowledge appears prominent among men but not women. Findings from regression and cost-effectiveness analyses always favor the collection of objective measures of knowledge. Given the lowest rate of accuracy for adoption was around 80%, costlier objective adoption measures are recommended for a subsample in regions with heterogeneous farm sizes.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Gender

KW - Measurement error

KW - Objective adoption

KW - Objective knowledge

KW - Self-reported adoption

KW - Self-reported knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928199101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928199101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/agec.12173

DO - 10.1111/agec.12173

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928199101

VL - 46

SP - 449

EP - 462

JO - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

JF - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

SN - 0169-5150

IS - 3

ER -