Measures of intensity discrimination

D. Wesley Grantham, William Yost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several different measures have been employed in the literature to describe performance by human observers in intensity discrimination tasks. These measures include the difference limen (DL) or “â†/in dB,” the Weber fraction (â†I/I), and signal-to-masker ratio. This article describes the mathematical relationship among these measures for conditions in which masker and signal are (1) sinusoids of the same frequency; (2) sinusoids of different frequencies; and (3) noise waveforms. We provide a table which contains values of each of these measures, describing equivalent performance over the typical range obtained in most intensity discrimination experiments. We express some cautions that should be observed in choosing and reporting particular measures of intensity discrimination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)406-410
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume72
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

discrimination
sine waves
limen
waveforms
Discrimination
Observer
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Measures of intensity discrimination. / Wesley Grantham, D.; Yost, William.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 72, No. 2, 01.01.1982, p. 406-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wesley Grantham, D. ; Yost, William. / Measures of intensity discrimination. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1982 ; Vol. 72, No. 2. pp. 406-410.
@article{670d83e2db5e4443bae4b62ce5c1c442,
title = "Measures of intensity discrimination",
abstract = "Several different measures have been employed in the literature to describe performance by human observers in intensity discrimination tasks. These measures include the difference limen (DL) or “{\^a}†/in dB,” the Weber fraction ({\^a}†I/I), and signal-to-masker ratio. This article describes the mathematical relationship among these measures for conditions in which masker and signal are (1) sinusoids of the same frequency; (2) sinusoids of different frequencies; and (3) noise waveforms. We provide a table which contains values of each of these measures, describing equivalent performance over the typical range obtained in most intensity discrimination experiments. We express some cautions that should be observed in choosing and reporting particular measures of intensity discrimination.",
author = "{Wesley Grantham}, D. and William Yost",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.388092",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "406--410",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measures of intensity discrimination

AU - Wesley Grantham, D.

AU - Yost, William

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

N2 - Several different measures have been employed in the literature to describe performance by human observers in intensity discrimination tasks. These measures include the difference limen (DL) or “â†/in dB,” the Weber fraction (â†I/I), and signal-to-masker ratio. This article describes the mathematical relationship among these measures for conditions in which masker and signal are (1) sinusoids of the same frequency; (2) sinusoids of different frequencies; and (3) noise waveforms. We provide a table which contains values of each of these measures, describing equivalent performance over the typical range obtained in most intensity discrimination experiments. We express some cautions that should be observed in choosing and reporting particular measures of intensity discrimination.

AB - Several different measures have been employed in the literature to describe performance by human observers in intensity discrimination tasks. These measures include the difference limen (DL) or “â†/in dB,” the Weber fraction (â†I/I), and signal-to-masker ratio. This article describes the mathematical relationship among these measures for conditions in which masker and signal are (1) sinusoids of the same frequency; (2) sinusoids of different frequencies; and (3) noise waveforms. We provide a table which contains values of each of these measures, describing equivalent performance over the typical range obtained in most intensity discrimination experiments. We express some cautions that should be observed in choosing and reporting particular measures of intensity discrimination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020167592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020167592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.388092

DO - 10.1121/1.388092

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 406

EP - 410

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 2

ER -