Measurement of the interference structure function [Formula Presented] for the [Formula Presented] reaction in the quasielastic region

M. Holtrop; D. Jordan; T. McIlvain; Ricardo Alarcon; R. Beck; W. Bertozzi; V. Bhushan; W. Boeglin; J. P. Chen; D. Dale; G. Dodson; S. Dolfini; K. Dow; J. Dzengeleski; M. B. Epstein; M. Farkhondeh; S. Gilad; J. Görgen; K. Joo; J. Kelsey; W. Kim; R. Laszewski; R. Lourie; J. Mandeville; D. J. Margaziotis; D. Martinez; R. Miskimen; C. Papanicolas; S. Penn; W. Sapp; A. J. Sarty; D. Tieger; C. Tschalaer; W. Turchinetz; G. Warren; L. Weinstein; S. Williamson

doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205

Measurement of the interference structure function [Formula Presented] for the [Formula Presented] reaction in the quasielastic region

M. Holtrop, D. Jordan, T. McIlvain, Ricardo Alarcon, R. Beck, W. Bertozzi, V. Bhushan, W. Boeglin, J. P. Chen, D. Dale, G. Dodson, S. Dolfini, K. Dow, J. Dzengeleski, M. B. Epstein, M. Farkhondeh, S. Gilad, J. Görgen, K. Joo, J. KelseyW. Kim, R. Laszewski, R. Lourie, J. Mandeville, D. J. Margaziotis, D. Martinez, R. Miskimen, C. Papanicolas, S. Penn, W. Sapp, A. J. Sarty, D. Tieger, C. Tschalaer, W. Turchinetz, G. Warren, L. Weinstein, S. Williamson

Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The coincidence cross section and the interference structure function, [Formula Presented] were measured for the [Formula Presented] reaction at quasielastic kinematics and central momentum transfer of [Formula Presented] The measurement was at an opening angle of [Formula Presented] covering a range in missing energy of [Formula Presented] to 65 MeV. The [Formula Presented] structure function is found to be consistent with zero for [Formula Presented] confirming an earlier study which indicated that [Formula Presented] vanishes in this region. The integrated strengths of the [Formula Presented]- and [Formula Presented]-shell are compared with a distorted wave impulse approximation (DWIA) calculation. The [Formula Presented]-shell strength and shape are also compared with a Hartree Fock–random phase approximation (HF-RPA) calculation. The DWIA calculation does not succeed in giving a consistent description of both the cross section data and the extracted [Formula Presented] response for either shell. The HF-RPA calculation describes the data more consistently, which may be due to the inclusion of 2-body currents in this calculation.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	3205-3211
Number of pages	7
Journal	Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics
Volume	58
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205
State	Published - 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205

Cite this

Holtrop, M., Jordan, D., McIlvain, T., Alarcon, R., Beck, R., Bertozzi, W., Bhushan, V., Boeglin, W., Chen, J. P., Dale, D., Dodson, G., Dolfini, S., Dow, K., Dzengeleski, J., Epstein, M. B., Farkhondeh, M., Gilad, S., Görgen, J., Joo, K., ... Williamson, S. (1998). Measurement of the interference structure function [Formula Presented] for the [Formula Presented] reaction in the quasielastic region. Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 58(6), 3205-3211. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205

Holtrop, M, Jordan, D, McIlvain, T, Alarcon, R, Beck, R, Bertozzi, W, Bhushan, V, Boeglin, W, Chen, JP, Dale, D, Dodson, G, Dolfini, S, Dow, K, Dzengeleski, J, Epstein, MB, Farkhondeh, M, Gilad, S, Görgen, J, Joo, K, Kelsey, J, Kim, W, Laszewski, R, Lourie, R, Mandeville, J, Margaziotis, DJ, Martinez, D, Miskimen, R, Papanicolas, C, Penn, S, Sapp, W, Sarty, AJ, Tieger, D, Tschalaer, C, Turchinetz, W, Warren, G, Weinstein, L & Williamson, S 1998, 'Measurement of the interference structure function [Formula Presented] for the [Formula Presented] reaction in the quasielastic region', Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 3205-3211. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205

@article{ac89274539fb438785cb6d07004a8e9f,

title = "Measurement of the interference structure function [Formula Presented] for the [Formula Presented] reaction in the quasielastic region",

abstract = "The coincidence cross section and the interference structure function, [Formula Presented] were measured for the [Formula Presented] reaction at quasielastic kinematics and central momentum transfer of [Formula Presented] The measurement was at an opening angle of [Formula Presented] covering a range in missing energy of [Formula Presented] to 65 MeV. The [Formula Presented] structure function is found to be consistent with zero for [Formula Presented] confirming an earlier study which indicated that [Formula Presented] vanishes in this region. The integrated strengths of the [Formula Presented]- and [Formula Presented]-shell are compared with a distorted wave impulse approximation (DWIA) calculation. The [Formula Presented]-shell strength and shape are also compared with a Hartree Fock–random phase approximation (HF-RPA) calculation. The DWIA calculation does not succeed in giving a consistent description of both the cross section data and the extracted [Formula Presented] response for either shell. The HF-RPA calculation describes the data more consistently, which may be due to the inclusion of 2-body currents in this calculation.",

author = "M. Holtrop and D. Jordan and T. McIlvain and Ricardo Alarcon and R. Beck and W. Bertozzi and V. Bhushan and W. Boeglin and Chen, {J. P.} and D. Dale and G. Dodson and S. Dolfini and K. Dow and J. Dzengeleski and Epstein, {M. B.} and M. Farkhondeh and S. Gilad and J. G{\"o}rgen and K. Joo and J. Kelsey and W. Kim and R. Laszewski and R. Lourie and J. Mandeville and Margaziotis, {D. J.} and D. Martinez and R. Miskimen and C. Papanicolas and S. Penn and W. Sapp and Sarty, {A. J.} and D. Tieger and C. Tschalaer and W. Turchinetz and G. Warren and L. Weinstein and S. Williamson",

year = "1998",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "58",

pages = "3205--3211",

journal = "Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics",

issn = "0556-2813",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of the interference structure function [Formula Presented] for the [Formula Presented] reaction in the quasielastic region

AU - Holtrop, M.

AU - Jordan, D.

AU - McIlvain, T.

AU - Alarcon, Ricardo

AU - Beck, R.

AU - Bertozzi, W.

AU - Bhushan, V.

AU - Boeglin, W.

AU - Chen, J. P.

AU - Dale, D.

AU - Dodson, G.

AU - Dolfini, S.

AU - Dow, K.

AU - Dzengeleski, J.

AU - Epstein, M. B.

AU - Farkhondeh, M.

AU - Gilad, S.

AU - Görgen, J.

AU - Joo, K.

AU - Kelsey, J.

AU - Kim, W.

AU - Laszewski, R.

AU - Lourie, R.

AU - Mandeville, J.

AU - Margaziotis, D. J.

AU - Martinez, D.

AU - Miskimen, R.

AU - Papanicolas, C.

AU - Penn, S.

AU - Sapp, W.

AU - Sarty, A. J.

AU - Tieger, D.

AU - Tschalaer, C.

AU - Turchinetz, W.

AU - Warren, G.

AU - Weinstein, L.

AU - Williamson, S.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The coincidence cross section and the interference structure function, [Formula Presented] were measured for the [Formula Presented] reaction at quasielastic kinematics and central momentum transfer of [Formula Presented] The measurement was at an opening angle of [Formula Presented] covering a range in missing energy of [Formula Presented] to 65 MeV. The [Formula Presented] structure function is found to be consistent with zero for [Formula Presented] confirming an earlier study which indicated that [Formula Presented] vanishes in this region. The integrated strengths of the [Formula Presented]- and [Formula Presented]-shell are compared with a distorted wave impulse approximation (DWIA) calculation. The [Formula Presented]-shell strength and shape are also compared with a Hartree Fock–random phase approximation (HF-RPA) calculation. The DWIA calculation does not succeed in giving a consistent description of both the cross section data and the extracted [Formula Presented] response for either shell. The HF-RPA calculation describes the data more consistently, which may be due to the inclusion of 2-body currents in this calculation.

AB - The coincidence cross section and the interference structure function, [Formula Presented] were measured for the [Formula Presented] reaction at quasielastic kinematics and central momentum transfer of [Formula Presented] The measurement was at an opening angle of [Formula Presented] covering a range in missing energy of [Formula Presented] to 65 MeV. The [Formula Presented] structure function is found to be consistent with zero for [Formula Presented] confirming an earlier study which indicated that [Formula Presented] vanishes in this region. The integrated strengths of the [Formula Presented]- and [Formula Presented]-shell are compared with a distorted wave impulse approximation (DWIA) calculation. The [Formula Presented]-shell strength and shape are also compared with a Hartree Fock–random phase approximation (HF-RPA) calculation. The DWIA calculation does not succeed in giving a consistent description of both the cross section data and the extracted [Formula Presented] response for either shell. The HF-RPA calculation describes the data more consistently, which may be due to the inclusion of 2-body currents in this calculation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032266999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032266999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3205

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032266999

SN - 0556-2813

VL - 58

SP - 3205

EP - 3211

JO - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

JF - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

IS - 6

ER -

Measurement of the interference structure function [Formula Presented] for the [Formula Presented] reaction in the quasielastic region

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this