In this paper, I criticize David McNaughton and Piers Rawling’s formalization of the agent-relative/agent-neutral distinction. I argue that their formalization is unable to accommodate an important ethical distinction between two types of conditional obligations. I then suggest a way of revising their formalization so as to fix the problem.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||7|
|State||Published - Nov 2001|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science