Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry

Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future

Suniya Luthar, Pamela J. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study of resilience has two core characteristics: it is fundamentally applied in nature, seeking to use scientific knowledge to maximize well-being among those at risk, and it draws on expertise from diverse scientific disciplines. Recent advances in biological processes have confirmed the profound deleterious effects of harsh caregiving environments, thereby underscoring the importance of early interventions. What remains to be established at this time is the degree to which insights on particular biological processes (e.g., involving specific brain regions, genes, or hormones) will be applied in the near future to achieve substantial reductions in mental health disparities. Aside from biology, resilience developmental researchers would do well to draw upon relevant evidence from other behavioral sciences as well, notably anthropology as well as family, counseling, and social psychology. Scientists working with adults and with children must remain vigilant to the advances and missteps in each others' work, always ensuring caution in conveying messages about the "innateness" of resilience or its prevalence across different subgroups. Our future research agenda must prioritize reducing abuse and neglect in close relationships; deriving the "critical ingredients" in effective interventions and going to scale with these; working collaboratively to refine theory on the construct; and responsibly, proactively disseminating what we have learned about the nature, limits, and antecedents of resilient adaptation across diverse at-risk groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)931-955
Number of pages25
JournalDevelopment and Psychopathology
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biological Phenomena
Behavioral Sciences
Developmental Biology
Social Psychology
Anthropology
Counseling
Mental Health
Research Personnel
Hormones
Brain
Genes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry : Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future. / Luthar, Suniya; Brown, Pamela J.

In: Development and Psychopathology, Vol. 19, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 931-955.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{16cb81200de14755ad94a42ee78961d3,
title = "Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future",
abstract = "The study of resilience has two core characteristics: it is fundamentally applied in nature, seeking to use scientific knowledge to maximize well-being among those at risk, and it draws on expertise from diverse scientific disciplines. Recent advances in biological processes have confirmed the profound deleterious effects of harsh caregiving environments, thereby underscoring the importance of early interventions. What remains to be established at this time is the degree to which insights on particular biological processes (e.g., involving specific brain regions, genes, or hormones) will be applied in the near future to achieve substantial reductions in mental health disparities. Aside from biology, resilience developmental researchers would do well to draw upon relevant evidence from other behavioral sciences as well, notably anthropology as well as family, counseling, and social psychology. Scientists working with adults and with children must remain vigilant to the advances and missteps in each others' work, always ensuring caution in conveying messages about the {"}innateness{"} of resilience or its prevalence across different subgroups. Our future research agenda must prioritize reducing abuse and neglect in close relationships; deriving the {"}critical ingredients{"} in effective interventions and going to scale with these; working collaboratively to refine theory on the construct; and responsibly, proactively disseminating what we have learned about the nature, limits, and antecedents of resilient adaptation across diverse at-risk groups.",
author = "Suniya Luthar and Brown, {Pamela J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S0954579407000454",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "931--955",
journal = "Development and Psychopathology",
issn = "0954-5794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry

T2 - Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future

AU - Luthar, Suniya

AU - Brown, Pamela J.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - The study of resilience has two core characteristics: it is fundamentally applied in nature, seeking to use scientific knowledge to maximize well-being among those at risk, and it draws on expertise from diverse scientific disciplines. Recent advances in biological processes have confirmed the profound deleterious effects of harsh caregiving environments, thereby underscoring the importance of early interventions. What remains to be established at this time is the degree to which insights on particular biological processes (e.g., involving specific brain regions, genes, or hormones) will be applied in the near future to achieve substantial reductions in mental health disparities. Aside from biology, resilience developmental researchers would do well to draw upon relevant evidence from other behavioral sciences as well, notably anthropology as well as family, counseling, and social psychology. Scientists working with adults and with children must remain vigilant to the advances and missteps in each others' work, always ensuring caution in conveying messages about the "innateness" of resilience or its prevalence across different subgroups. Our future research agenda must prioritize reducing abuse and neglect in close relationships; deriving the "critical ingredients" in effective interventions and going to scale with these; working collaboratively to refine theory on the construct; and responsibly, proactively disseminating what we have learned about the nature, limits, and antecedents of resilient adaptation across diverse at-risk groups.

AB - The study of resilience has two core characteristics: it is fundamentally applied in nature, seeking to use scientific knowledge to maximize well-being among those at risk, and it draws on expertise from diverse scientific disciplines. Recent advances in biological processes have confirmed the profound deleterious effects of harsh caregiving environments, thereby underscoring the importance of early interventions. What remains to be established at this time is the degree to which insights on particular biological processes (e.g., involving specific brain regions, genes, or hormones) will be applied in the near future to achieve substantial reductions in mental health disparities. Aside from biology, resilience developmental researchers would do well to draw upon relevant evidence from other behavioral sciences as well, notably anthropology as well as family, counseling, and social psychology. Scientists working with adults and with children must remain vigilant to the advances and missteps in each others' work, always ensuring caution in conveying messages about the "innateness" of resilience or its prevalence across different subgroups. Our future research agenda must prioritize reducing abuse and neglect in close relationships; deriving the "critical ingredients" in effective interventions and going to scale with these; working collaboratively to refine theory on the construct; and responsibly, proactively disseminating what we have learned about the nature, limits, and antecedents of resilient adaptation across diverse at-risk groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548261712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548261712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0954579407000454

DO - 10.1017/S0954579407000454

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 931

EP - 955

JO - Development and Psychopathology

JF - Development and Psychopathology

SN - 0954-5794

IS - 3

ER -