Matters of fact and politics

Generating expectations of cancer screening

Kiran Pienaar, Alan Petersen, Diana Bowman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States have established national screening programs in the effort to advance the early diagnosis of cancers. Australia has population screening programs for breast, bowel and cervical cancers, and this article focuses on breast and cervical cancer screening as the two longest running programs in Australia. While these screening programs are well-established and report relatively high participation rates, the effectiveness of population screening is a contested issue, subject to significant, ongoing debate about its purported benefits (Armstrong, 2019). In this article, we draw on ideas from sociology of science on the construction of scientific facts to analyse how evidentiary claims are presented in policy documents for Australia's breast and cervical cancer screening programs, and the implications for those who are the targets of screening. We explore how screening-related information assumes the status of scientific ‘facts’, and argue that presenting information as neutral and objective obscures the political choices involved in its generation. Importantly, some of the claims presented in the policy documents have a tendency to emphasise the benefits, and minimise the risks and harms of population-based screening. In doing so, we suggest that the current national policies may be contributing to sustaining expectations of screening that are higher than warranted. Higher expectations may bring with them unintended societal and economic costs to the public. We conclude by noting how deeply ingrained socio-cultural meanings of cancer shape public expectations of the protective value of screening, which allows current screening approaches to become further entrenched and resistant to challenge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)408-416
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume232
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Politics
Early Detection of Cancer
cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
politics
Breast Neoplasms
Insurance Claim Review
Population Control
Sociology
sociology of science
early diagnosis
Population
Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Screening
Cancer
participation
Neoplasms
costs
economics

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Cancer screening
  • Construction of scientific facts
  • Policy analysis
  • Public expectations
  • Sociology of science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Matters of fact and politics : Generating expectations of cancer screening. / Pienaar, Kiran; Petersen, Alan; Bowman, Diana.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 232, 01.07.2019, p. 408-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7f50e9109184de481055ed88f180c2c,
title = "Matters of fact and politics: Generating expectations of cancer screening",
abstract = "Many countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States have established national screening programs in the effort to advance the early diagnosis of cancers. Australia has population screening programs for breast, bowel and cervical cancers, and this article focuses on breast and cervical cancer screening as the two longest running programs in Australia. While these screening programs are well-established and report relatively high participation rates, the effectiveness of population screening is a contested issue, subject to significant, ongoing debate about its purported benefits (Armstrong, 2019). In this article, we draw on ideas from sociology of science on the construction of scientific facts to analyse how evidentiary claims are presented in policy documents for Australia's breast and cervical cancer screening programs, and the implications for those who are the targets of screening. We explore how screening-related information assumes the status of scientific ‘facts’, and argue that presenting information as neutral and objective obscures the political choices involved in its generation. Importantly, some of the claims presented in the policy documents have a tendency to emphasise the benefits, and minimise the risks and harms of population-based screening. In doing so, we suggest that the current national policies may be contributing to sustaining expectations of screening that are higher than warranted. Higher expectations may bring with them unintended societal and economic costs to the public. We conclude by noting how deeply ingrained socio-cultural meanings of cancer shape public expectations of the protective value of screening, which allows current screening approaches to become further entrenched and resistant to challenge.",
keywords = "Australia, Cancer screening, Construction of scientific facts, Policy analysis, Public expectations, Sociology of science",
author = "Kiran Pienaar and Alan Petersen and Diana Bowman",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "232",
pages = "408--416",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Matters of fact and politics

T2 - Generating expectations of cancer screening

AU - Pienaar, Kiran

AU - Petersen, Alan

AU - Bowman, Diana

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Many countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States have established national screening programs in the effort to advance the early diagnosis of cancers. Australia has population screening programs for breast, bowel and cervical cancers, and this article focuses on breast and cervical cancer screening as the two longest running programs in Australia. While these screening programs are well-established and report relatively high participation rates, the effectiveness of population screening is a contested issue, subject to significant, ongoing debate about its purported benefits (Armstrong, 2019). In this article, we draw on ideas from sociology of science on the construction of scientific facts to analyse how evidentiary claims are presented in policy documents for Australia's breast and cervical cancer screening programs, and the implications for those who are the targets of screening. We explore how screening-related information assumes the status of scientific ‘facts’, and argue that presenting information as neutral and objective obscures the political choices involved in its generation. Importantly, some of the claims presented in the policy documents have a tendency to emphasise the benefits, and minimise the risks and harms of population-based screening. In doing so, we suggest that the current national policies may be contributing to sustaining expectations of screening that are higher than warranted. Higher expectations may bring with them unintended societal and economic costs to the public. We conclude by noting how deeply ingrained socio-cultural meanings of cancer shape public expectations of the protective value of screening, which allows current screening approaches to become further entrenched and resistant to challenge.

AB - Many countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States have established national screening programs in the effort to advance the early diagnosis of cancers. Australia has population screening programs for breast, bowel and cervical cancers, and this article focuses on breast and cervical cancer screening as the two longest running programs in Australia. While these screening programs are well-established and report relatively high participation rates, the effectiveness of population screening is a contested issue, subject to significant, ongoing debate about its purported benefits (Armstrong, 2019). In this article, we draw on ideas from sociology of science on the construction of scientific facts to analyse how evidentiary claims are presented in policy documents for Australia's breast and cervical cancer screening programs, and the implications for those who are the targets of screening. We explore how screening-related information assumes the status of scientific ‘facts’, and argue that presenting information as neutral and objective obscures the political choices involved in its generation. Importantly, some of the claims presented in the policy documents have a tendency to emphasise the benefits, and minimise the risks and harms of population-based screening. In doing so, we suggest that the current national policies may be contributing to sustaining expectations of screening that are higher than warranted. Higher expectations may bring with them unintended societal and economic costs to the public. We conclude by noting how deeply ingrained socio-cultural meanings of cancer shape public expectations of the protective value of screening, which allows current screening approaches to become further entrenched and resistant to challenge.

KW - Australia

KW - Cancer screening

KW - Construction of scientific facts

KW - Policy analysis

KW - Public expectations

KW - Sociology of science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066260474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066260474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.020

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.020

M3 - Article

VL - 232

SP - 408

EP - 416

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -