MARS: Metaframework for Assessing Ratings of Sustainability for Buildings and Infrastructure

Dean Papajohn, Chris Brinker, Mounir El Asmar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many sustainability rating systems have been developed to assess the sustainable development of the built environment. Most rating systems rely on indicators to measure specific project features. However, there is no widely accepted framework to help evaluate sustainability rating systems. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a metaframework for assessing ratings of sustainability (MARS). Instead of assessing specific projects, MARS provides a high-level view by analyzing the sustainability rating systems themselves. A literature review highlights relevant theories, concepts, and processes used in frameworks of sustainable rating systems. A content analysis of 95 peer-reviewed publications from multiple disciplines identified 19 key criteria. These 19 criteria were organized into a metaframework that can be used to assess, improve, and compare existing rating systems, and may also serve as a basis to create new rating systems in the future. A MARS scorecard is presented and its application explained and pilot tested with a standard infrastructure rating system called Envision. Future research will use MARS to more fully evaluate existing rating systems such as Envision, Civil Engineering Environmental Quality Assessment and Award Scheme (CEEQUAL), Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Scheme, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04016026
JournalJournal of Management in Engineering
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Rating system
Rating
Sustainability
Civil engineering

Keywords

  • Assessment frameworks
  • Indicators
  • Infrastructure
  • Performance measurement
  • Rating systems
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Engineering(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

MARS : Metaframework for Assessing Ratings of Sustainability for Buildings and Infrastructure. / Papajohn, Dean; Brinker, Chris; El Asmar, Mounir.

In: Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 1, 04016026, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3ac92318270241579267f1e97a3eace8,
title = "MARS: Metaframework for Assessing Ratings of Sustainability for Buildings and Infrastructure",
abstract = "Many sustainability rating systems have been developed to assess the sustainable development of the built environment. Most rating systems rely on indicators to measure specific project features. However, there is no widely accepted framework to help evaluate sustainability rating systems. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a metaframework for assessing ratings of sustainability (MARS). Instead of assessing specific projects, MARS provides a high-level view by analyzing the sustainability rating systems themselves. A literature review highlights relevant theories, concepts, and processes used in frameworks of sustainable rating systems. A content analysis of 95 peer-reviewed publications from multiple disciplines identified 19 key criteria. These 19 criteria were organized into a metaframework that can be used to assess, improve, and compare existing rating systems, and may also serve as a basis to create new rating systems in the future. A MARS scorecard is presented and its application explained and pilot tested with a standard infrastructure rating system called Envision. Future research will use MARS to more fully evaluate existing rating systems such as Envision, Civil Engineering Environmental Quality Assessment and Award Scheme (CEEQUAL), Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Scheme, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).",
keywords = "Assessment frameworks, Indicators, Infrastructure, Performance measurement, Rating systems, Sustainability, Sustainable development",
author = "Dean Papajohn and Chris Brinker and {El Asmar}, Mounir",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000478",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
journal = "Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0742-597X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MARS

T2 - Metaframework for Assessing Ratings of Sustainability for Buildings and Infrastructure

AU - Papajohn, Dean

AU - Brinker, Chris

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Many sustainability rating systems have been developed to assess the sustainable development of the built environment. Most rating systems rely on indicators to measure specific project features. However, there is no widely accepted framework to help evaluate sustainability rating systems. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a metaframework for assessing ratings of sustainability (MARS). Instead of assessing specific projects, MARS provides a high-level view by analyzing the sustainability rating systems themselves. A literature review highlights relevant theories, concepts, and processes used in frameworks of sustainable rating systems. A content analysis of 95 peer-reviewed publications from multiple disciplines identified 19 key criteria. These 19 criteria were organized into a metaframework that can be used to assess, improve, and compare existing rating systems, and may also serve as a basis to create new rating systems in the future. A MARS scorecard is presented and its application explained and pilot tested with a standard infrastructure rating system called Envision. Future research will use MARS to more fully evaluate existing rating systems such as Envision, Civil Engineering Environmental Quality Assessment and Award Scheme (CEEQUAL), Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Scheme, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).

AB - Many sustainability rating systems have been developed to assess the sustainable development of the built environment. Most rating systems rely on indicators to measure specific project features. However, there is no widely accepted framework to help evaluate sustainability rating systems. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a metaframework for assessing ratings of sustainability (MARS). Instead of assessing specific projects, MARS provides a high-level view by analyzing the sustainability rating systems themselves. A literature review highlights relevant theories, concepts, and processes used in frameworks of sustainable rating systems. A content analysis of 95 peer-reviewed publications from multiple disciplines identified 19 key criteria. These 19 criteria were organized into a metaframework that can be used to assess, improve, and compare existing rating systems, and may also serve as a basis to create new rating systems in the future. A MARS scorecard is presented and its application explained and pilot tested with a standard infrastructure rating system called Envision. Future research will use MARS to more fully evaluate existing rating systems such as Envision, Civil Engineering Environmental Quality Assessment and Award Scheme (CEEQUAL), Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Scheme, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).

KW - Assessment frameworks

KW - Indicators

KW - Infrastructure

KW - Performance measurement

KW - Rating systems

KW - Sustainability

KW - Sustainable development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009135114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009135114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000478

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000478

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85009135114

VL - 33

JO - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0742-597X

IS - 1

M1 - 04016026

ER -