Markets versus monopolies in education

The historical evidence

Andrew Coulson, Sherman Dorn, David O'Keefe, William J. Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A common point of contention among educators and economists is the likely effect a free market would have on modern education. Most supporters of public schooling maintain that the field would either be adversely affected by competition and choice, or that the effects would be insubstantial. Conversely, a significant number of critics argue that education, like all other human exchanges, would respond to market incentives with improved performance, increased attention to the needs of families, and greater innovation. Historical evidence is presented indicating that teachers and schools are indeed affected by the financial incentives of the systems in which they operate. In particular, the data show that economic pressures have forced schools in competitive markets to meet the needs of families, through methodological advancements and diversity in curriculum, while centralized bureaucratic systems have generally been coercive and pedagogically stagnant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-41
Number of pages41
JournalEducation Policy Analysis Archives
Volume4
StatePublished - Jun 12 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

monopoly
market
incentive
evidence
education
school
economist
critic
educator
innovation
curriculum
teacher
performance
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Markets versus monopolies in education : The historical evidence. / Coulson, Andrew; Dorn, Sherman; O'Keefe, David; Hunter, William J.

In: Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 4, 12.06.1996, p. 1-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coulson, Andrew ; Dorn, Sherman ; O'Keefe, David ; Hunter, William J. / Markets versus monopolies in education : The historical evidence. In: Education Policy Analysis Archives. 1996 ; Vol. 4. pp. 1-41.
@article{ec6c10cbb07541ffa59e3824b02c85e5,
title = "Markets versus monopolies in education: The historical evidence",
abstract = "A common point of contention among educators and economists is the likely effect a free market would have on modern education. Most supporters of public schooling maintain that the field would either be adversely affected by competition and choice, or that the effects would be insubstantial. Conversely, a significant number of critics argue that education, like all other human exchanges, would respond to market incentives with improved performance, increased attention to the needs of families, and greater innovation. Historical evidence is presented indicating that teachers and schools are indeed affected by the financial incentives of the systems in which they operate. In particular, the data show that economic pressures have forced schools in competitive markets to meet the needs of families, through methodological advancements and diversity in curriculum, while centralized bureaucratic systems have generally been coercive and pedagogically stagnant.",
author = "Andrew Coulson and Sherman Dorn and David O'Keefe and Hunter, {William J.}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
day = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--41",
journal = "Education Policy Analysis Archives",
issn = "1068-2341",
publisher = "Arizona State University",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Markets versus monopolies in education

T2 - The historical evidence

AU - Coulson, Andrew

AU - Dorn, Sherman

AU - O'Keefe, David

AU - Hunter, William J.

PY - 1996/6/12

Y1 - 1996/6/12

N2 - A common point of contention among educators and economists is the likely effect a free market would have on modern education. Most supporters of public schooling maintain that the field would either be adversely affected by competition and choice, or that the effects would be insubstantial. Conversely, a significant number of critics argue that education, like all other human exchanges, would respond to market incentives with improved performance, increased attention to the needs of families, and greater innovation. Historical evidence is presented indicating that teachers and schools are indeed affected by the financial incentives of the systems in which they operate. In particular, the data show that economic pressures have forced schools in competitive markets to meet the needs of families, through methodological advancements and diversity in curriculum, while centralized bureaucratic systems have generally been coercive and pedagogically stagnant.

AB - A common point of contention among educators and economists is the likely effect a free market would have on modern education. Most supporters of public schooling maintain that the field would either be adversely affected by competition and choice, or that the effects would be insubstantial. Conversely, a significant number of critics argue that education, like all other human exchanges, would respond to market incentives with improved performance, increased attention to the needs of families, and greater innovation. Historical evidence is presented indicating that teachers and schools are indeed affected by the financial incentives of the systems in which they operate. In particular, the data show that economic pressures have forced schools in competitive markets to meet the needs of families, through methodological advancements and diversity in curriculum, while centralized bureaucratic systems have generally been coercive and pedagogically stagnant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242589296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242589296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 41

JO - Education Policy Analysis Archives

JF - Education Policy Analysis Archives

SN - 1068-2341

ER -